Monday, March 3, 2014

CANADA MILITARY NEWS: March 3 2014- FASCISM WINS UKRAINE UNELECTED LEADERS- China innocents butchered by heretic Muslims/Canada .. we need 2 take care of our women and children and clean up universities spewing hate and rape against girls and women- our troops died 2 free Afghan women4God's sake- LET UKRAINE CLEAN IT'S OWN MESS AND RUN CRIMEA ..RUN







Women at War- Canada



Canada History





O CANADA- CELINE DION





We Are Canadian Soldiers


40,000 Canadian walked passed Canada allowing draft dodgers and stepped up 4 their brothers and sisters in Vietnam.... many did NOT come home... many were IDLE NO MORE - AMERICAS FIRST PEOPLES 




Justice 4 our women and our children- NO MORE VICTIMS IN OUR CANADA.... NO MORE
MARCH 8- INTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S DAY.... One Billion Rising





BLOGGED EARLIER:

CANADA AND RUSSIA HAVE PRICKLY STRONG RELATIONSHIP OF RESPECT- Did ya know Canada declared war on Russia -January 11, 1914, Vilhjalmur Stefansson?/IDLE NO MORE CANADA/ Terry Fox AND OUR SOCHI WINTER PARALYMPICS 2014 IN MOTHER RUSSIA WILL GO AHEAD- we all need dreams/Canada's Wars/ARCTIC/NORAD/EU is no better than Russia - let Ukraine decide and Crimea leave if they want- Canada needs 2 protect women and children we are afraid in our nation- get back 2 basics/2wolves hate and love..who will u feed

http://nova0000scotia.blogspot.ca/2014/03/canada-and-russia-have-prickly-strong.html

-----------------

WW2 Tweets from 1942 ‏@RealTimeWWII  10m
German troops have occupied the Kerch peninsula, wiping out all Russian armies in the Crimea- only Sevastapol remains pic.twitter.com/eOSSuo760X

Embedded image permalink
-----------------

CANADA- could smell this sheeeet a mile away..... EU = FASCISM  OF THE WORST KIND- OVER $$$ 2  TRILLION DOLLARS DAMAGES HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY EUROPEAN UNION'S ABSOLUTELY  FASCISTS
let Ukraine and Crimea look after themselves.... STOP TAKING OUR GLOBAL $$$$TAXPAYER MONEY 4 THIS SHEEEEET...... SYRIA??? RUCRAZY UNITED NATIONS- U HAVE WASTED $$TRILLIONS ON MUSLIM HATING MUSLIM WARS .... WHEN POVERTY IS RAMPANT.... ON OUR PLANET...

pardon the screaming... but this is ...just ridiculous  ..omg.. and now our China... beautiful China - the heartbreak of the innocents in China...

nazi-flags_1387345i

AND ..HERE WE GO IN UKRAINE... THE FASCISTS HAVE WON.... RUN CRIMEA ...RUN 2 RUSSIA OR GOD HELP U EACH AND ALL.... LOOK AT WHAT FASCISM HAS DONE AND CAUSED INEUROPE   $$$$ TRILLIONS IN STREET AND DAMAGES... 

Alarming trend in Ukraine: Historic monuments toppled, Nazi symbols spread Looming Dangers of Neo-Fascism 


AND.. UNITED NATIONS WILL DO NADA... NADA... NADA...

  1. Duma: Western-Backed Fascism, Terrorism In Power In Ukraine ...

    rickrozoff.wordpress.com/.../duma-western-backed-fascism-terrorism-in-...
    2 days ago - But it is fascism and terrorism that have proclaimed their power in ... by the Federation Council today is fully in line with the Constitution and ...

------------------

  1. blogdog: Alarming trend in Ukraine: Historic monuments toppled ...

    blogdogcicle.blogspot.com/2014/.../alarming-trend-in-ukraine-historic.ht...
    6 days ago - ... toppled, Nazi symbols spread Looming Dangers of Neo-Fascism ... This shift towards fascist forces is not limited to Ukraine. ... Obama, McCain, and Kerry; support terrorists, are guilty of treason, and must be removed from office. ... 2012 Part1 - In 2012 the New World Order will suffer major defeats to their ...
--------------------

TAYLOR: Ukraine stance is evidence of Baird’s unfortunate consistency


In 1991, as Ukraine sought independence from the crumbling Soviet Union, the naval dockyard in Sevastopol was a major stumbling block. The compromise solution was for Russia to sign a long-term lease, similar to Britain’s former arrangement in Hong Kong.
Thus it seems even more ludicrous that Baird would fly 8,000 kilometres to announce his support for the anti-Yanukovych faction, while warning his Kremlin counterparts not to intervene on territory upon which they legitimately have military resources. The other major issue, which gets glossed over in all the media’s anti-Russian rhetoric, is the fact that the majority of the public discontent stems from Ukraine’s collapsed economy.
Unemployment and underemployment — especially among the youth — is rampant. Were it not for the black market, most Ukrainians could not subsist.
Some analysts have estimated that it will require an infusion of at least $35 billion over the next two years just to stabilize the Ukrainian economy. That is not something that will be easily overcome by whatever form of government emerges following the current crisis.
Also glazed over in the rush to demonize the Yanukovych-Russia team is the fact there has been little mentioned about who constitutes the new authority. The factions, which Baird was so eager to embrace, are described by those in the western Ukraine enclaves as the “fascists.”
This of course is a simplistic categorization of their political enemies, which has its roots in the Second Word War. When Hitler’s troops invaded the Soviet Union, Ukraine produced a large volume of willing volunteers, many driven by their anti-Semitic beliefs.
The 14th Waffen Grenadier Division of the SS, consisting of Ukrainian recruits, was considered one of the most ruthless perpetrators of persecution against Jews on the Eastern front. While it would be a leap of logic to compare the anti-Yanukovych faction to the Nazis, there are in their ranks, strident anti-Semites.
-------------

We weep 4 beautiful China.... and the innocents who suffer by the evil heretic Muslims who are destroying the beautiful Faith of Islam all around the world.... as 7 billion people tired and 2 the breaking point on MUSLIM ON MUSLIM HATRED... that is spilling over 2 millions and millions and millions of global innocents....

Look at the ruination of Heritage Islam Culture that has been destroyed by these Heretic Muslims.... why is this being tolerated.... exterminate them..... NOW!

Enough...look at the faces of the innocent Chinese on this day.... it's just heartbreaking...



... and


 look how Canada dissidents are picking it up... a lunatic just murdered 2 innocent Canadians and injured
ca.news.yahoo.com/police-still-figuring-motive-fatal-edmo...‎
Yahoo! News
Read 'Murder charges laid against suspect in Edmonton stabbing rampage' on Yahoo News Canada. EDMONTON - Police in ... By The Canadian Press | The Canadian Press – 2 hours 25 minutes ago. Email 0 ... Cost of violent crimes topped $12 billion in one year: Justice Canada study ... Four others were injured.
and..

globalnews.ca/.../breaking-loretta-saunders-disappearance-now-murder-i...‎
5 days ago - HALIFAX – The remains of a missing and pregnant Saint Mary's University student have been found. ... Her car was found in Ontario last week and her two roommates, ... was doing her thesis on missing and murdered aboriginal women. ... Maloney, president of the Nova Scotia Native Women's Association

-----------

COMMENT: See what the Islam are turning the world into
COMMENT:  Tomorrow, when the Chinese government begins a crackdown on these terrorists, the West will warn of "dire consequences". Now, everyone is keeping silent.

China captures train station attack suspects
March 3, 2014 by aljazeera 2 Comments

Chinese police have captured three suspects for a knife-wielding railway station attack that killed 29 people and wounded 143, authorities told state media.
“Three suspects involved in the terrorist attack in the southwestern city of Kunming had been captured,” the official news agency Xinhua said on Monday, citing the ministry of public security.
Altogether eight members of a “terrorist gang” carried out the stabbing spree late on Saturday, Xinhua said.
Four more of the group were shot dead by police and a wounded woman was captured at the scene, it continued, naming their leader as Abdurehim Kurban.
China has blamed separatists from its restive far-western region of Xinjiang, home to the mainly Muslim Uighur minority, for what it describes as an “act of terror”, with state media dubbing the incident “China’s 9/11″.
The incident that happened at around 9pm local time (1pm GMT) late Saturday night at Kunming Railway Station in Yunnan province ”was an organised, premeditated violent terrorist attack”, Xinhua earlier reported, citing authorities.
Defiant Kunming residents queued to donate blood on Monday while others vented their anger.
Many Chinese Internet users accused the United States of double standards on social media, after Washington condemned the bloody rampage by attackers but refrained from calling it a terrorist incident.
-----------------


Violent terrorist attack at Chinese train station, 27 dead, 109 injured


comment;
Muslims spreading the love yet again. Can you feel it.

AND..these poor Muslims of China must now pay the price 4 Heretic Muslim monsters... NOT FAIR... ANYMORE... NOT FAIR...



After 35 die, China Uighur downplays Xinjiang attack

--------------

33 killed in knife attack at China train station

More than 10 assailants slashed scores of people with knives at a train station in southern China, drawing police fire, in what authorities called a terrorist assault by ethnic separatists based in the far west, state media said on Sunday. Thirty-three people were killed and 130 wounded.
Police fatally shot four of the assailants, arrested one and were searching for the others following the attack late Saturday at the Kunming train station in Yunnan province, Xinhua said.
The attackers, most of them dressed in black, stormed the train station and started attacking people on Saturday evening, according to witnesses.
Student Qiao Yunao was waiting to catch a train at the station when people starting crying and running, and then saw a man slash another man’s neck, drawing blood.
“I was freaking out, and ran to a fast food store, and many people were running in there to take refuge,” she told The Associated Press via Sina Weibo, the Chinese equivalent of Twitter. “I saw two attackers, both men, one with a watermelon knife and the other with a fruit knife. They were running and chopping whoever they could.”
Another witness, Yang Haifei, said he saw a person “come straight at me with a long knife and I ran away with everyone.” People who were slow to escape ended up severely injured, he told Xinhua.
One suspect was arrested, Xinhua said. Evidence found at the scene of the attack showed that it was “a terrorist attack carried out by Xinjiang separatist forces,” the agency quoted the municipal government as saying. Authorities considered it to be “an organised, premeditated violent terrorist attack.”
Politburo member Meng Jianzhu, arrived in Kunming on Sunday morning and went straight to the hospital to visit the wounded and their families, Xinhua reported.
President Xi Jinping called for “all-out efforts” to bring the culprits to justice. In a statement, the Security Management Bureau under the Ministry of Public Security said that police will “crack down the crimes in accordance with the law without any tolerance.”
5 suspects shot dead
Authorities said five suspects were shot dead but that their identities had not yet been confirmed, and police were hunting for the remaining attackers, Xinhua reported. The news agency said 29 people described as civilians were confirmed dead and 130 injured.

------------------


Why China compares Kunming station terror attack to 9/11
Beijing has blamed Saturday's deadly attack at a train station on Uighur separatists from Xinjiang province. Foreign experts point to local grievances, but a strike-hard policy is popular.
By Peter Ford, Staff writer / March 3, 2014


Apples, burning incense and candles in glass holders are seen on the floor as people pay tribute to the victims of a knife attack at Kunming railway station in Kunming, Yunnan province, China March 3, 2014.
Wong Campion/REUTERS
Within hours of Saturday's terrorist attack on Kunming railway station that left 33 people dead, the Chinese authorities had identified the alleged perpetrators: extremist Muslim separatists, ethnic Uighurs from the western province of Xinjiang.
Now they will crack down hard, as they have done before. Police have already begun rounding up Uighurs in Kunming for questioning. Four of the knife-wielding assailants were shot dead by police, another is in custody, and police say they have arrested three suspects, though others are still on the run, according to official media.

The prospects for ordinary Uighurs in Xinjiang are grim. Already they chafe under strict controls on religious expression, education and other cultural aspects of daily life, and under the close eye of the police.
For years, Western governments have privately advised Chinese officials to ease popular resentment by relaxing those controls. But Beijing is in no mood to win hearts and minds in the aftermath of a terror attack that a state newspaper dubbed China's 9/11. And, judging by the anger and shock expressed on Chinese social media, a steely approach to terrorism resonates with the public.
“Local issues and social conflicts in Xinjiang have nothing to do with terror activities,” says Li Wei, a government adviser and head of the Anti-Terrorism Research Center at the China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations, a Beijing think tank close to the security forces. “Social conflicts are irrelevant to terrorism.”
Behind Saturday’s attack and others blamed on Uighur militants “is an extremist Islamic mindset,” says Yang Shu, a Central Asia specialist at Lanzhou University in western China. “The government has to remove that mentality from peoples’ minds,” he adds.
That, Prof. Yang acknowledges, is a “very difficult task,” that will not be accomplished overnight. In the meantime, he says, quoting a Chinese saying, “cut the poisonous weeds and pull up the roots. The government’s most urgent task is to cut the weeds and stop the attacks.” Dealing with the root causes of the violence will have to wait, he says.
So far, the authorities have offered no evidence to back up the assertion that Uighurs carried out the Kunming attack. But if they are right, it bodes ill for moderates seeking to ameliorate Uighurs’ lives within the Chinese system. “This attack distracts attention from widespread (Uighur) discontent,” says Gardner Bovingdon, a Xinjiang expert at Indiana University in Bloomington. “It plays into the hands of Beijing’s argument that the problem is one of a small group of Islamic terrorists.”
A Western diplomat here said that China's tactics in confronting spreading Uighur extremism have largely been counterproductive. “The only way they can think of removing radical Islam from peoples’ minds is to beat it out of them and that will not work,” he says.

Heightened surveillance
Uighurs point out that they have been subject to police sweeps and heightened surveillance both in and outside Xinjiang since last October. That month a Uighur family plowed their car through a crowd outside the Forbidden City in central Beijing and then blew themselves up, killing two bystanders too.
The increased security has not stopped attacks by Uighurs; indeed the rhythm of such incidents appears to have stepped up, according to official reports.
In the past, the government has blamed the East Turkestan Islamic Movement for attacks on both civilians and policemen. It has not yet blamed the Kunming assault on any group; local and foreign experts doubt that any one organization is behind the spate of attacks.
“I think it more likely that the criminals in Kunming were members of a gang,” says Yang. “That’s normally what we find in Xinjiang, not evidence of a larger organization with a leadership and a structure.”
Such “sporadic, disorganized events…are difficult for the government to control,” points out Dru Gladney, who follows Uighur affairs as a professor of anthropology at Pomona College in Claremont, Ca.
Prof. Li, the government advisor, agreed that it was hard for China to prevent future attacks, since "terrorists will take advantage of the weakest region to attack.” Even if police manage to subdue Xinjiang, other cities in China should brace for violence, he adds.
Kunming, a provincial capital in southwest China, is over 900 miles from Xinjiang and lies closer to Thailand and Vietnam than to China's western frontiers. Saturday's attack would be the deadliest Uighur-related violence since riots erupted in Xinjiang's capital, Urumqi in 2009. Nearly 200 people died in sectarian clashes between Uighurs and Han Chinese.
“Unfortunately,” predicts Prof. Gladney, “unless there are real and dramatic changes in policy” towards the Uighur minority, “one can only expect that there will be more of these attacks.”


-----------------


Final three suspects caught in China stabbing rampage
5:45 AM Tuesday Mar 4, 2014
Police have captured the three remaining suspects in a slashing rampage at a train station in southwestern China that killed 29 people, state media said.
Authorities say the attack in Kunming city that also wounded 143 was carried out by separatists from the far-western region of Xinjiang.
Clashes in Xinjiang between authorities and ethnic Uighurs over the past year have left scores dead, but the assault Saturday evening occurred more than 1,500 kilometres to the southeast in Yunnan province, which has not had a history of such unrest.
Citing a statement from the Ministry of Public Security, the official Xinhua News Agency said that a "terrorist gang" of six men and two women led by a person identified as Abdurehim Kurban was responsible for the attack.
Xinhua said police shot and killed four of the attackers, who used knives to slash at crowds of people, and captured an injured female suspect at the scene.
The brief Xinhua report did not identify the ethnicity of the eight or say how the final three suspects were identified and captured.
Xinjiang is home to a simmering rebellion against Chinese rule by some members of the Muslim Uighur population, and the government has responded there with heavy-handed security.
Another unprecedented attack attributed by authorities to Uighurs occurred last October in Beijing. Three assailants and two tourists were killed in the attack at Tiananmen Gate.

----------------







BLOGGED:



CANADA MILITARY NEWS: This Muslim on Muslim hate wars destroying our planet/Arabs and Persians and their hate factions are killing millions of innocent Muslims- and the world is tired of this shit -NO MORE $$$$$- Muslims murdering over 2 million innocent Muslims and don’t care!





Al-Qaeda, NATO’s Timeless Tool
The discovery of links connecting Prime Minister Recep Tayyip ErdoÄŸan and Al- Qaeda is upsetting Turkish politics. Ankara not only actively supported terrorism in Syria, but did so as part of a NATO strategy. The case also shows the artificiality of armed groups fighting against the government and the Syrian people.
So far, the authorities of the Member States of NATO affirm that the international jihadist movement, whose training they supported during the Afghan war against the Soviets (1979), would have turned against them upon the liberation of Kuwait (1991). They accuse Al-Qaeda of having attacked embassies in Kenya and Tanzania (1998) and of plotting the attacks of September 11, 2001 but admitted that, after the official death of Osama Bin Laden (2011), some jihadist elements again collaborated with them in Libya and Syria. However, Washington would have ended this tactical rapprochement in December 2012.
Now, this version is contradicted by the facts : Al-Qaeda has always fought the same enemies as the Atlantic Alliance, as reveals once again the scandal currently shaking Turkey.
We are learning that the Al-Qaeda banker, Yasin al-Qadi, who was designated as such and pursued by the United States since the attacks against embassies in Kenya and Tanzania (1998), was a personal friend of both former U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney and current Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip ErdoÄŸan. We discover that this ” terrorist” led a lavish lifestyle, traveling by private plane and mocking UN sanctions against him. Thus, at least four times, he visited ErdoÄŸan in 2012, arriving by the second Istanbul airport where, after disconnecting the cameras, he was welcomed by the head of the Prime Minister’s guard without going through customs.
According to the Turkish police and judges who revealed this information and incarcerated the children of several ministers involved in the case, December 17, 2013 – before being divested of the investigation (relieved of their duties) by the Prime Minister -, Yasin al-Qadi and Recep Tayyip ErdoÄŸan had developed an extensive system of diversion of funds to finance al-Qaeda in Syria.
At the same time that this incredible double play was exposed, the Turkish police stopped a truck carrying weapons for Al-Qaeda near the Syrian border. Of the three people arrested, one said he was conveying the load on behalf of IHH, the ’humanitarian’ Association of the Turkish Muslim Brotherhood, while another claimed to be a Turkish secret agent on a mission. Ultimately, the governor prevented the police and justice from doing their work, confirming that the transport was a covert MIT (Turkish Secret Service) operation, and ordered that the truck and its load continue their journey.
The investigation also shows that the Turkish financing of Al- Qaeda used an Iranian company both to act undercover in Syria and to conduct terrorist operations in Iran. NATO already had accomplices in Tehran during the “Iran-Contra” operation in former President Rafsandaji’s inner circles, such as Sheikh Rohani, who has become the current president.
These facts come into play as the Syrian political opposition in exile launches a new theory on the eve of the Geneva 2 Conference: The al-Nosra Front and the Islamic Emirate in Iraq and the Levant (ÉIIL) would be façades of the Syrian secret services trying to frighten the population to keep it under control. The only armed opposition would be that of the Free Syrian Army (FSA), which recognizes the authority of the Syrian political opposition. There would be no problem of representativeness at the Peace Conference.
We are therefore asked to forget all the good that the same opposition in exile was saying of Al-Qaeda for three years and the silence of NATO members on the spread of terrorism in Syria.
Therefore, if we can allow that most of the leaders of the Atlantic Alliance were unaware of the support of their organization for international terrorism, we must also allow that NATO is mainly responsible for world terrorism.
Translation
Roger Lagassé


-------------
nova0000scotia.wordpress.com/.../canada-military-news-this-muslim-on-...‎
Jan 6, 2014 - Our Global Youth are competing at Sochi Winter ... the world's best at catching the coward Heretic Muslim Monsters- – The ..... But each time this happens, we destroy another foundational brick propping up our global system.
-----------------------



REMEMBER THE HERETIC MUSLIM  TALIBAN BOASTS FROM 2007 ABOUT TAKING ON PAKISTAN, INDIA, CHINA AND RUSSIA.... NO FEAR??  ... WELL HERE WE ARE...

North Atlantic Treaty Orga...
The NATO-Russia Council meets regularly - most recently in June 2007 in St. .... be faced with a resurgent Taliban threatening Russia's soft Central Asian underbelly. ... It is senseless for NATO members, Russia and China to continue to play a ...
---------------------------------
FROM THE SUMMER OF 2007-  and 4 those of u who didn't realize how savvy us everyday folks in the millions surrounding and protecting the backs of our sons and daughters wearing our flags were at finding real news and sharing through every means possible- guess what.....even  the global $$$roadkill murdering media 4 love of causing mayhem and destruction learnt 2 back off..... and 2 respect us ..... we can find and dig and find the real deal news....and ensure our troops are safe... and we know who the real monsters are- they wear the faces of way 2 many United Nations and Politicians globally..... enough...

... from 2007....


NATO and Russia: Sobering thoughts and practical suggestions
../graphics/contents/a1b.jpg
Ionian Sea, 15 February 2006: The British destroyer HMS Nottingham and the Russian cruiser Moskva during training activities conducted to help prepare Russian Navy crews for participation in Operation Active Endeavour (© NATO )
Dmitri Trenin takes a hard look at the NATO-Russia relationship on the fifth anniversary of the NATO-Russia Council and the tenth of the Paris Founding Act on Mutual Relations.
For nearly a decade after the emergence of the Russian Federation, NATO-related issues were a key focus of Moscow's foreign policy. The Alliance was both a symbol of the Cold War and the premier Western club. Russia vacillated between half-hearted attempts to join the Alliance on special terms, and futile efforts to prevent the country's neighbours from seeking membership as a security guarantee against Russia itself.

Three main developments shaped the relationship during the 1990s:
·         Bosnia and Herzegovina, where the NATO/US use of force in 1995 led to the signing of the Dayton Peace Agreement, and the subsequent peacekeeping operations, in which Russian troops took part under NATO command;
·         NATO's enlargement invitation in 1997 to the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland, and their accession in 1999, a bitter pill barely sweetened for Moscow by the creation of the Permanent Joint Council (PJC), a consultative mechanism between Russia and the Alliance; and
·         the 1999 Kosovo crisis, which culminated in NATO's 78-day air campaign against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, despite Russia's most vehement protests.
Despite these serious issues, Russia continued to participate in Stabilisation Force (SFOR) operations in Bosnia and Herzegovina and indeed requested to join the Kosovo Force (KFOR) in June 1999, again under NATO command. Nevertheless, by the end of President Yeltsin's time at the Kremlin, Russia-NATO relations were in a deep freeze.
A New Start?
At the beginning of President Vladimir Putin's first term, there was hope for a new start. Some believed that, if Russia were to accede to NATO, this would serve as a silver bullet, doing away forever with past enmity and ushering in genuine friendship. But it was not to be. Relations were restored and membership was probed anew, but again without success.

There were, however, unexpected bonuses. A few weeks after 9/11, a US-led military campaign removed the most serious post-Cold War external threat to Russia's security, the Taliban regime in Afghanistan. Soon thereafter, NATO forces took on the mission of helping to stabilise Afghanistan - the Alliance's first major out-of-area military campaign. From Moscow's perspective, an alliance, which for decades had been facing the Soviet Union in Central Europe, had turned into a coalition that was helping to secure the approaches to Central Asia, Russia's most vulnerable flank.

After a bumpy ride through the 1990s, solid improvements in the first few years of this decade, followed by the recent souring of relations, it is clear that for the relationship to improve, both sides must make significant efforts In 2002, the Alliance's relations with Russia were reconfigured and the new NATO-Russia Council (NRC) was established. In contrast to the Permanent Joint Council which was essentially a bilateral structure, the new NRC meets at 27, so that each nation participates in its national capacity, and on an equal footing with the others. Thus the Russia-NATO relationship has been able to survive and develop, even though Moscow's foreign policy from 2003 onward became more independent and assertive, and Russian relations with NATO began to sour.

The NATO-Russia Council meets regularly - most recently in June 2007 in St. Petersburg and Moscow to commemorate its fifth anniversary. Russia has a mission at NATO Headquarters and a military office at the Allied Command Operations (SHAPE), while NATO keeps a military liaison as well as an information office in Moscow. There is a range of common interests, from fighting terrorism to ensuring WMD non-proliferation.

Under the auspices of the NRC, 17 subordinate bodies work on key areas of cooperation. Occasionally joint exercises are held in areas such as emergency response. Russian warships have started to participate in NATO's Active Endeavour maritime counter-terrorist operation in the Mediterranean. Moscow signed a Partnership for Peace Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) with NATO, and allows Germany and France to use a corridor across its territory en route to Afghanistan. There has been wide-ranging collaboration in defence reform, military-to-military cooperation (importantly, the NATO-Russia military interoperability programme), maritime search and rescue and a joint pilot project on counter-narcotics training for Central Asian and Afghan personnel.

The Russians certainly understand NATO much better today than they did in the 1990s. All this lends a degree of stability and predictability to the relationship, even though mutual expectations have been revised downward.
Ambivalence
There is fundamental ambivalence in Moscow about the existing situation. Russia treats NATO as a geopolitical "factor", rather than as a partner. The country now has a window on the Alliance - but still has no handle on it. Russia is voicing strong objections to what it views as negative developments:
·         the possibility of the Alliance admitting Georgia and Ukraine as members;
·         the temporary use by the United States, on a rotational basis, of existing military facilities in Bulgaria and Romania; and especially
·         the planned deployments of elements of a US ballistic missile defence system in Poland and the Czech Republic.
Russia has several additional concerns: NATO countries delaying ratification of the Adapted Treaty on Conventional Forces in Europe (CFE) and the Alliance's reluctance to establish formal relations with the Russian-led Collective Security Treaty Organisation (CSTO).

Some of NATO's newer members bring memories of Soviet domination to the table. So Moscow is now emphasising bilateral relations with individual European countries, concentrating on remaining sympathetic ears in Central Europe and hoping for more farther to the west.

It is clear, though, that five years after the Rome Declaration on NATO-Russia Relations and ten years after the Paris Founding Act on Mutual Relations, Cooperation and Security, Russia-NATO relations are not currently headed toward any kind of major convergence. Yet, the relationship continues to be important. What it needs most is careful management to ensure that inherent rivalries are minimised, and that cooperation is maximised wherever possible.
Enlargement
On the issue of NATO enlargement, Moscow would be wise to leave the decisions to the countries in question. Whether candidate countries join the Alliance - and if so, when - should be up to those nations themselves. In view of Moscow's stated goals, Russian intervention can only be counterproductive. The Kremlin's official position of treating Alliance accession as a sovereign right of each individual country, and of focusing on the management of Russia's own security, makes good sense.

It may be that Georgia will get the Membership Action Plan in the spring of 2008, which would put the country on track to join the Alliance a few years later. In Ukraine, however, NATO must admit that the accession issue is likely to remain politically divisive and potentially destabilising. Calm handling of these situations by both sides would help to uphold stability and security in Europe's east.
Missile Defence
While these do not fall under NATO, the issue of the US ballistic missile defence plans represents both a risk and an opportunity for the NATO-Russia relationship. The risk is that, if the United States shuts Russia out, anti-Western trends in Russia's security and defence policy could be exacerbated, which is clearly not Washington's objective.

The opportunity is that, if the issue were to be used to reinvigorate WMD cooperation, mutual confidence would be strengthened. It would lead to closer interaction on the source of the perceived danger; that is, Iran's missile and nuclear programmes. Cooperation on ballistic missile defence will not be easy, but is certainly worth trying. Indeed, a shared system - which would use Russian radar and detection facilities, as well as information-sharing sites - has been recently proposed by President Putin as an alternative to current US plans.

The Russia-NATO relationship has been able to survive and develop, even though Moscow's foreign policy from 2003 onward became more independent and assertive The current NATO and Russian joint efforts in the field of theatre missile defence could be a model for possible US-Russia MD cooperation and could provide a basis for a more integrated and comprehensive approach for a missile defence architecture for Europe.

Similarly, the issue of intermediate-range nuclear forces (INF), prohibited under the 1987 INF treaty and now being raised again by Russian officials, calls for close consultations between Russia and NATO with a view to strengthening mutual confidence and preventing a destabilising arms race.
CFE Treaty
Since it was signed in 1990, the CFE Treaty has been the principal material foundation of the European security order. It must continue to play that role. Moscow's concerns about the Baltic nations' accession to the 1999 Adapted CFE Treaty, and its ratification by the United States and other Western countries, are genuine and should be taken seriously - Russia's withdrawal from the CFE Treaty would be in nobody's interest.

By the same token, NATO members' concerns about Moscow's implementation of its Istanbul commitments concerning its remaining troops in Georgia and Moldova call for joint action - even if, in Russia's view, there is no formal link between these commitments and the ratification of the Adapted Treaty.

President Putin's declaration earlier this year of a "moratorium" on the Treaty was followed by Russia's call for an Extraordinary Conference, which occurred in mid-June. Russia had already begun to delay CFE inspections, but after President Putin's meeting with the NATO Secretary General during the NRC anniversary celebrations, the inspection regime resumed. The President took another positive step in recommending that CFE issues should be discussed in the NRC, and this recommendation was taken up.
Peacekeeping
Moldova's frozen conflict on the Dniester offers a real opportunity to launch the first-ever peacekeeping operation in which Russia and NATO act as equal partners. Arguably, this is the least difficult of the former-Soviet flashpoints to be resolved.

Moldova has reaffirmed its intention to abstain from seeking NATO membership. The operation would involve only a limited military and police force, probably just a few hundred men. Russia is genuinely indispensable to any solution in Moldova, and can be expected to act on an equal footing with NATO.

If successful, such a joint operation could pave the way for Western countries to ratify the Adapted CFE Treaty. It could also serve as a model for other joint peacekeeping missions - most likely in the southern Caucasus - in situations that meet what might be called 'the Moldova criterion', that is, where Russia has an interest in finding a solution, is indispensable to that solution and yet is unable to solve the conflict single-handedly.

With some of NATO's newer members bringing memories of Soviet domination to the table, Moscow is now emphasising bilateral relations with individual European countries For several years, Russia and NATO have been working on increasing interoperability, with a view to engaging in joint peacekeeping operations. Neither the Middle East nor Africa appears to be likely areas for putting that expertise into practice. Certain areas of the former Soviet Union, on the other hand, could - and, in my view, should - represent an ideal area to test interoperability.
Afghanistan
The Russians have no reason to feel any schadenfreude as a result of the difficulties faced by NATO and the United States in Afghanistan. If international efforts fail to stabilise that country, Moscow will be faced with a resurgent Taliban threatening Russia's soft Central Asian underbelly. There is therefore a clear need for closer consultations between Russia and the West on how to turn the tide against Islamist radicals.

Helping the moderates to hold on to Kabul and the Afghan provinces is a far better alternative than having to start reconstituting the Northern Alliance in Taloqan.
NATO-CSTO
That, in turn, raises the issue of NATO-CSTO ties. So far, NATO has been very reluctant to formalise any relationship with the organisation, fearing that such a step would seal Russian dominance of Central Asia.

In reality, there is not much evidence of any such domination. Kazakhstan has been openly pursuing a multi-vector policy, successfully manoeuvring between Moscow, Beijing and Washington. Uzbekistan's fealty to Russia is uncertain and at best temporary, as Tashkent refuses to be Moscow's pawn. Two years after the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation's (SCO) call for a US withdrawal, Kyrgyzstan is still permitting a US base to exist next to a small Russian one. Tajikistan has adopted a tous azimuts foreign policy, its president having symbolically de-Russified his last name.

By engaging with the CSTO, NATO could contribute to that organisation's evolution toward a more modern regional security arrangement. It would also reassure Moscow that the Alliance does not seek to displace Russia as a major player in Central Asia, which would not be in Western interests anyway.

Agreement on a NATO-CSTO link could come as part of a package with the SCO opening up to the United States as an observer. It is senseless for NATO members, Russia and China to continue to play a petty game of regional rivalry at the price of allowing their common adversaries to take them on one by one.

The NATO-Russia partnership may well be at a turning point. After a bumpy ride through the 1990s, solid improvements in the first few years of this decade, followed by the recent souring of relations, it is clear that for the relationship to improve, both sides must make significant efforts.

Russia should let its neighbours to join NATO if they wish. At the same time, NATO should think strategically about which countries it offers membership. Cooperation on missile defence - excluding, for the time-being, the United States' controversial plans for a European ballistic missile shield - is at least being attempted, thus boosting cooperation in the area of WMD non-proliferation and building confidence for consultations on the INF Treaty. Beyond this, both sides need to take steps to ensure ratification of the Adapted CFE Treaty. NATO-Russia interoperability can and should be tested in joint peacekeeping operations in areas of the former Soviet Union such as Moldova. Russia and the international community would also be well-advised to collaborate on stabilising Afghanistan - and in stemming the flow of drugs out of that country. Lastly, NATO should engage with CSTO.

In my view, these actions would almost certainly improve the NATO-Russia partnership.
Dmitri Trenin is a Senior Associate of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and


-----------------------









No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.