-----------------
AIN'T IT THE DAMM TRUTH.... THOSE OF US IN THE 60s WORKING FACTORIES SAME WORK AS MEN... we made $8 an hour... they made $18 for the same work.... oh well... at least it brings discussion.... ONE BILLION RISING...
COMMENT: and whose work undoubtedly moved the feminist cause forward by decades
So no, she's not saying the Rosie wasn't instrumental in helping change gender perceptions. I was also dubious about the headline as I started reading the article, but when I actually read the whole thing there were some valid points made, for example:
His propaganda conveniently ignored the fact that women would have been expected to carry on with the housework once they got in, and then, after a war spent being paid nearly 50% less than their male colleagues, would be sacked. When we dress up as her, we’re dressing up as an airbrushed fib.
Sorry Beyoncé, Rosie the
Riveter is no feminist icon. Here’s why
This
American wartime propaganda image has been appropriated by Beyoncé, but it’s an
airbrushed fib, far from the reality of working women
·
'Rosie the Riveter is still
feminism’s most visible icon of a working woman.' Photograph:
/Instagram
The
image, posted on Instagram, melted the Twittersphere. In it, Queen Bey poses in front of a “We Can Do It!” bubble, with toned
bicep aloft, denim shirt artfully wrinkled and a scarlet scarf holding back
tumbling hair. She’s Rosie the Riveter and she looks awesome.
It may
have been an average day for Beyoncé, but E! Entertainment, breaking its
admirable habit of quiet understatement, quickly dubbed it “the ultimate
feminist photo”, as did thousands of feminists across the internet.
I can
well appreciate how cool a symbol Rosie is to copy. But a feminist icon she is
not.
Rosie
dates back to the second world war, a symbol inspired by the women who took up
the factory and munitions jobs left behind by conscripted men, and whose work
undoubtedly moved the feminist cause forward by decades. But she represents a
cynically whitewashed view of this, and her feminist credentials wear thin when
you look into the history of her creation, and the background of those she was
supposed to portray.
The
bicep-curling version popular today was designed by a man, J Howard Miller, who
took inspiration from tired, oil-covered workers but washed them down and
dolled them up to produce his Rosie. Miller never intended his creation to be a
symbol of female empowerment – she was used to encourage women to take up jobs
in factories as part of their patriotic duty to the war effort.
His
propaganda conveniently ignored the fact that women would have been expected to
carry on with the housework once they got in, and then, after a war spent being
paid nearly 50% less than their male colleagues, would be sacked. When we dress
up as her, we’re dressing up as an airbrushed fib. Of course, some argue that
this re-appropriation is dissent, but even if you believe that there’s still
something problematic with the riveter symbol.
That
problem is her lack of friends. More than 60 years after Miller put his
head-scarved wet dream on to paper, she’s still feminism’s most visible icon of
a working woman. Despite the fact that women make up the majority of the
world’s poverty-stricken people, the poor and working-class still struggle to
be heard amid a glut of middle- and upper-class icons – the Pankhursts,
Germaine Greer, Virginia Woolf, Mary Wollstonecraft. Isn’t it time we found a
new Rosie, a realistic representation of what it’s like to be a woman and work
today?
There are
the Dagenham machinists, whose strike action led to the Equal Pay Act
1970. Or Mrs
Desai, who led a two-year picket in protest at poor working conditions in
the late 70s. It’s less glamorous, but the costume of most of the women workers
in the world was worn out, underpaid and malnourished.
Anyone
for dressing up as a knackered retail worker on minimum wage, or a
rubble-covered sweatshop worker who had to saw her own arm off to escape the
rubble of her workplace?
Perhaps
not. That kind of poor isn’t as cool as Rosie’s, nor would it make as good a
costume. Feminism’s attitude to the poor should be more than working-class
drag.
-----------------
What is female genital mutilation?
Female
genital mutilation causes severe pain and significant long-term
psychological and physical problems. Here are some of the key points you
need to know about the practice and why it needs to end
• Sign the Change.org petition to end female genital mutilation
• Sign the Change.org petition to end female genital mutilation
"Type one FGM would be like removing a male’s testes, type three is equivalent to removing both the testes and the penis. There is no way that would be deemed acceptable," says Taina Bien Aime, director of the Coalition Against Trafficking in Women, who adds that comparisons between male and female circumcision are unhelpful.
FGM can lead to severe bleeding, pain, complete loss of sensitivity, complications during childbirth, infertility, severe pain during sex, recurring infections and urine retention. And in some cases it is lethal. Unlike male circumcision, female genital mutilation also inhibits sexual pleasure.
It is agreed that female gential mutilation has no health benefits and surgery is sometimes required in later life to open-up or seal the vagina again.
Campaign groups and survivors of FGM warn that despite legislation against female genital mutilation in the US, American girls are being taken out of the country to be cut, and may be subjected to mutilation on US soil.
The number of American women and girls affected or at risk is believed to have grown by 35 per cent to at least 228,000 between 1997 and 2000, according to the African women’s health center of Brigham and Women’s hospital in Boston, Massachusetts. Approximately 6000 girls are mutilated around the world every day.
FGM can be performed in different ways, with the main three: clitoridectemy, excision and infibulation.
Type 1: Clitoridectemy
Type 2: Excision
Type 3: Infibulation
Aside from these three main types, a further fourth type encompasses any other non-medical incision, piercing, scraping or pricking of the genitalia. The practice predates all religions and has been seen in the mummified bodies of pharaoh princesses.
A lack of widespread knowledge and information about FGM is putting American girls at risk, says Shelby Quast, policy advisor at the campaign group Equality Now. "We look at the various diaspora communities and as they grow, the number of girls at risk grows as well."
The Guardian along with Congressman Joe Crowley, Ban Ki Moon and over 38,000 people are backing Jaha Dukureh's campaign asking the US government to update statistics on at-risk girls in the US as the first step towards an action plan to end FGM in the US.
Show your support and sign the Change.org petition here.
http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/may/16/what-is-female-genital-mutilation-circumcision-us
--------------------
IRANIAN EYES
Female genital cutting fact sheet
Print this fact sheet
- Female genital cutting fact sheet (full version) (PDF, 454 KB)
- Female genital cutting fact sheet health snapshot (one-page summary) (PDF, 289 KB)
- What is female genital cutting (FGC)?
- What is the difference between FGC, female circumcision, and FGM?
- At what ages do young women undergo FGC?
- Where is FGC practiced?
- Is FGC part of a religion?
- Why is FGC practiced?
- How many women have received FGC?
- What are the health problems caused by FGC?
- Why is FGC a human rights issue?
- What are the laws regarding FGC?
- What is being done about FGC?
- More information on female genital cutting
What is female genital cutting (FGC)?
The terms female genital cutting (FGC), female circumcision, and female genital mutilation (FGM) all describe the cultural practice of partially or totally removing the external female genitalia. The minor form of FGC is when the clitoris is removed. The most severe form of FGC is when all external genitalia are removed and the vaginal opening is stitched nearly closed. Only a small opening is left for urine and menstrual blood.What is the difference between FGC, female circumcision, and FGM?
All three terms describe the procedure that cuts away part or all of the external female genitalia. Deciding what exactly to call it is still being debated. Some people fear that parents may resent the implication that they are "mutilating" their daughters by participating in this largely cultural event, and so reject the term FGM in favor of FGC. Some people point out that the word "cutting" is less judgmental and relates better to terms used in many local languages. However, many women's health and human rights organizations use the word "mutilation" not only to describe the practice, but also to point out the violation of women's human rights.Previously, some referred to the practice as "circumcision" to link FGC to male circumcision. However, this word can hide the serious physical and psychological effects of cutting women's genitals. It also fails to show differences between the different types of cutting. For these reasons, a number of international organizations offer a compromise: "female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C)."
For our purposes in this fact sheet, womenshealth.gov refers to this practice as FGC.
At what ages do young women undergo FGC?
FGC is performed on infants, girls, and women of all ages. The age at which girls are cut can vary widely from country to country, and even within countries. Most often, FGC happens before a girl reaches puberty. Sometimes, however, it is done just before marriage or during a woman’s first pregnancy. In Egypt, about 90 percent of girls are cut between 5 and 14 years old. However, in Yemen, more than 75 percent of girls are cut before they are 2 weeks old. The average age at which a girl undergoes FGC is decreasing in some countries (Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, Egypt, Kenya, and Mali). Researchers think it’s possible that the average age of FGC is getting lower so that it can be more easily hidden from authorities in countries where there may be laws against it. It is also possible that FGC is performed on younger girls because they are less able to resist.Where is FGC practiced?
The practice of FGC is a cultural tradition performed across central Africa, in the southern Sahara, and in parts of the Middle East. Most women who have experienced FGC live in one of the 28 countries in Africa and the Middle East where FGC is practiced. Almost one-half of women who have experienced FGC live in Egypt or Ethiopia. (In Egypt, 2008 Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) information notes that female genital cutting rates are declining.)To a lesser degree, FGC is practiced in Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, and India. Some immigrants practice various forms of FGC in other parts of the world, including Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United States, and in European nations.
Is FGC part of a religion?
Although many people believe that FGC is associated with Islam, it is not. FGC is not supported by any religion and is condemned by many religious leaders. The practice crosses religious barriers. Muslims, Christians, and Jews have been known to support FGC on their girls.No religious text requires or even supports cutting female genitals. In fact, Islamic Shari'a protects children and protects their rights. From a Christian perspective, FGC has no religious grounds either. In fact, research shows that the relationship between religion and FGC is inconsistent at best.
However, even though religious texts don’t support FGC, some people still think the two are linked and claim religious teachings support FGC.
In six of the countries where FGC is practiced — Ethiopia, Cote d'Ivoire, Kenya, Senegal, Benin, and Ghana — Muslim population groups are more likely to practice FGC than Christian groups. In Nigeria, Tanzania, and Niger, though, the prevalence is greater among Christian groups.
Why is FGC practiced?
There are many reasons FGC is practiced, including social, economic, and political reasons. Those who support FGC believe that it will empower their daughters, ensure the girls get married, and protect the family’s good name. In some groups, FGC is performed to show a girl’s growth into womanhood and, as in the Masai community, marks the start of a girl’s sexual debut. It also is performed to keep a woman’s virginity by limiting her sexual behavior. FGC is believed (by those who practice it) to stop a woman’s sexual desire. In some groups, women who are not cut are viewed as dirty and are treated badly. While FGC pre-dates both Christianity and Islam, religion is also used to promote the practice. Some communities believe that in order to be good Muslims, parents must have their daughters cut.There are also many superstitions about FGC, such as:
- The clitoris will continue to grow as a girl gets older and so it must be removed.
- The external genitalia are unclean and can actually cause the death of an infant during delivery.
How many women have received FGC?
It is estimated that between 100 million and 140 million girls and women worldwide have received FGC. There are more than 3 million girls at risk of having FGC each year. It is unknown how many women in the United States have received FGC.What are the health problems caused by FGC?
FGC can cause a range of health problems, both short-term and long-term. The kinds of problems that develop depend upon the degree of the cutting, the cleanliness of the tools used to do the cutting, and the health of the girl or woman receiving the cutting. In most countries, FGC is performed in unclean conditions by mainly traditional practitioners who may use scissors, razor blades, or knives. In Egypt, though, up to 90 percent of FGC is performed by a health care professional. Almost every girl or woman who receives FGC experiences pain or bleeding.Short-term health problems:
- Bleeding or hemorrhaging: If the bleeding is severe, girls can die.
- Infection: The wound can get infected and develop into an abscess (a collection of pus). Girls can get fevers, sepsis (a blood infection), shock, and even die, if the infection is not treated.
- Pain: Girls are routinely cut without first being numbed or having anesthesia. The worst pain tends to occur the day after, when they have to urinate onto the wound.
- Trauma: Girls are held down during the procedure, which can be physically or psychologically traumatic.
- Problems going to the bathroom. In severe cases, women are left with only a small opening for urinating and menstrual bleeding. This can slow or strain the normal flow of urine, which can cause infections.
- Not being able to have sex normally. The most severe form of FGC leaves women with scars that cover most of their vagina. This makes sex very painful. These scars can also develop into bumps (cysts or abscesses) or thickened scars (keloids) that can be uncomfortable.
- Problems with gynecological health. Women who have had FGC sometimes have painful menstruation. They may not be able to pass all of their menstrual blood. They may also have infections over and over again. It can also be hard for a health care professional to examine a woman’s reproductive organs if she has had a more severe form of FGC. Normal tools cannot be used to perform a Pap test or a pelvic exam.
- Increased risk of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV. People who have no medical training, under unclean conditions, perform most forms of FGC. Many times, one tool is used for several procedures without sterilization. There is a growing concern that these conditions greatly increase the chance of spreading life-threatening infections such as hepatitis and HIV. Also, damage to the female sex organs during FGC can make the tissue more likely to tear during sex, which could also increase risk of STIs or HIV.
- Problems getting pregnant, and problems during pregnancy and labor. Infertility rates among women who have had FGC are as high as 25 to 30 percent and are mostly related to problems with being able to achieve sexual intercourse. The scar that covers the vagina makes this very difficult. Once pregnant, a woman can have drawn out labor, tears, heavy bleeding, and infection during delivery — all causing distress to the infant and the mother. Health care professionals who are unfamiliar with the scar will sometimes recommend a cesarean section. This is not necessary as women will be able to deliver vaginally once the scar is cut open. With rising numbers of young women coming to the United States from countries that practice FGC, U.S. doctors have begun caring for more and more patients who have been cut and facing some of these challenges. Based on a study of 28,000 women in 6 African countries, FGC is related to cesarean section, post-partum hemorrhage, episiotomy, extended hospital stays, the need for infant resuscitation, and death. While about 5 percent of babies born to women without FGC were stillborn or died shortly after delivery, this figure increased to 6.4 percent in babies born to women with FGC.
- Psychological and emotional stress. FGC is typically performed on very young girls. Some may not understand what is being done to them or why. The psychological effects of this painful experience are similar to those of post-traumatic stress disorder. Although very rare, girls and women who have had FGC may have problems sleeping, have more anxiety, and become depressed.
Why is FGC a human rights issue?
The WHO and the United Nations Commission on Human Rights, along with several African and Asian nations, have called for an end to the practice of FGC. The WHO views the practice as a violent act against a girl that causes her serious lifetime problems. The American Medical Association (AMA) also rejects FGC and supports laws against it. There is also growing international support for condemning FGC and a call for severe penalties given to those who practice it.Some cultures that practice FGC view it as their right. FGC supporters say that the Western practice of making breasts bigger and other plastic surgery is comparable to FGC.
What are the laws regarding FGC?
- The United States.
There is a federal law that makes the practice of FGC on anyone younger
than 18 years of age illegal within this country. It is a felony
punishable by fines or up to a 5-year prison term.
Some argue that such sanctions only force young women to return to their homeland where the surgery may not be performed in sanitary or safe conditions. As more people from cultures practicing FGC come to Western nations, this controversy has grown.
- Internationally. International health organizations and women’s rights advocates generally believe that lasting change towards FGC can only take place with the support of the governments and local communities within affected countries. Pressure from outside those countries has little chance for success if there is no educational and legal support from within their borders.
What is being done about FGC?
These are the most popular approaches used to try to stop the practice of FGC:- Community meetings.
Group meetings may help change thoughts toward FGC. These meetings need
to involve entire communities – girls, boys, women, and men – as well
as nearby communities which may also practice FGC. The most successful
of these meetings provide opportunities for people to discuss their
knowledge of FGC, relate it to their situation, and consider other
options. Some examples of these kinds of meetings include:
- Cross-generational conversations (meetings between older and younger members of a village)
- Male-female discussions
- Theatre productions
- Songs
- Community declarations
- Education.
In some regions, education is slowly changing attitudes and influencing
the choice to have FGC. Many programs are culturally sensitive and use
respected local women to teach other women and girls in their
communities about the harmful effects of FGC. Recent research shows that
women in these regions are beginning to support the worldwide call to
end FGC. Some of the most important research in recent years has been
the work done with Islamic scholars to change the perception that FGC is
required by the Koran, the Muslim holy book.
Human rights are at the heart of the abandonment of FGC by some communities. When human rights are shown to be in line with local values (for example, parents should do the best for their children and not cause them harm), attitudes toward FGC can change.
- Substitute rituals. In some countries, cultural groups have successfully replaced FGC with a ritual that does not involve cutting the genitals. In this way, the culture preserves its honor and starts new traditions that cause no harm to women. However, as girls are getting cut at younger and younger ages, often in infancy, these other rites of passage become less relevant.
- Changing attitudes. Right now, women are made to feel disloyal to their culture by choosing not to have FGC. This pressure can change if doctors and other health care workers would talk with women about the dangers of FGC and offer other options that don’t involve cutting. Some human rights advocates also suggest that men could help reduce the practice of FGC by openly marrying uncut women. Many human rights organizations are also calling on religious leaders to openly confirm that their religions do not require women to have FGC.
- Laws.
The choice to have a procedure with such permanent physical and
emotional effects should only be made by an adult woman for herself.
Some suggested legal actions against FGC include:- Establish laws prohibiting FGC.
- Prosecute parents who force FGC on their minor age children.
- Make health care workers report all cases of FGC.
- Classify FGC as child abuse and prosecute it as such.
- Make the criminal consequences of performing FGC more public.
Even
if laws are put into place, though, they will likely do little to stop
the practice of FGC. Also, in communities where FGC has a lot of
support, prosecuting parents will cause extreme controversy.
Eighteen
African countries enacted laws or decrees against FGC. Even countries
with the highest rates of FGC have recently openly noted the need for
banning this practice. Fines and jail sentences are typically minor, but
most view any sanctions against FGC as a good start.
- Research. There is ongoing research into the physical and psychological effects of FGC. A number of advocacy groups hope to bring FGC out into the open to discuss the harmful effects of this procedure. Ongoing research is needed to review the many different kinds of interventions that take place to stop FGC. Since there are many differences among the communities where FGC takes place, what works to stop FGC in one community may not work in another.
More information on female genital cutting
For more information about female genital cutting, call womenshealth.gov at 800-994-9662 (TDD: 888-220-5446) or contact the following organizations:- Amnesty International
Phone: 212-807-8400 - Center for Reproductive Rights
Phone: 917-637-3600 - Population Reference Bureau
Phone: 800-877-9881 - UNICEF
Phone: 212-686-5522 - U.S. Agency for International Development
Phone: 202-712-4810 - World Health Organization
Phone: 011-41-791-2111
---------------------------------
BRING BACK OUR GIRLS- CANADA
One Billion Rising- 2014
Female Circumcision, Female Genital Mutilation - What is Female Circumcision?
Millions of Girls and Women Subjected to Painful, Disfiguring Cultural Practice
By Linda Lowen
Answer: A cultural tradition in 28 North African countries, parts of Asia and the Middle East, and certain immigrant communities in Europe and North America, female genital mutilation (FGM) is routinely performed on females from infancy through age 15 and (in rarer cases) women.
FGM includes some or all of the following: partial or total removal of the clitoris, the labia minor and/or the labia majora; narrowing or sealing of the vaginal opening; and any form of pricking, piercing, incising, scraping or cauterizing of the genital area.
Cultures that practice FGM argue that the removal of external genitalia promotes femininity and modesty by rendering girls 'clean' and 'beautiful.' They believe FGM promotes chastity by reducing the female libido and minimizes the chances of illicit sexual behavior, thus ensuring premarital virginity and marital fidelity. Those females that do not undergo FGM are often ostracized and considered unfit for marriage.
Currently the World Health Organization estimates that between 100-140 million girls and women worldwide have undergone FGM.
Frequently performed by traditional circumcisers with implements as rudimentary as a dull pen knife -- and without anesthesia -- FGM causes severe pain. It can lead to potentially life-threatening complications such as hemorrhaging, shock, tetanus and sepsis. The long-term effects include urinary tract and bladder infections, cysts, infertility, complications with childbirth and infant deaths.
In some areas, FGM is now being performed by health care providers, a growing trend that worries those in the human rights and medical fields.
In 2010, the American Academy of Pediatrics came under fire when they briefly suggested that doctors offer the option of a genital prick to immigrant families in the US seeking FGM. The AAP's attempt to demonstrate cultural sensitivity backfired as opponents of any form of FGM -- however small and symbolic -- spoke out against the decision, causing the AAR to reverse their position and once again oppose FGM.
Numerous health and human rights organizations have come out against FGM and called for an end to this form of violence against girls and women. They include Amnesty International, the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA).
In 2008 the World Health Assembly passed a resolution on the elimination of FGM. And of the 28 African nations that allow FGM to continue, 26 have ratified CEDAW -- the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women -- which includes language that prohibits participating nations from continuing this type of culture-based gender violence and discrimination.
Sources:
Belluck, Pam. "Doctors Reverse Stand on Circumcision." New York Times at NYTimes.com. 26 May 2010.
"Female genital mutilation." World Health Organization Media Centre Fact Sheet. February 2010.
"Female Genital Mutilation: A Fact Sheet." Women's Rights at Amnesty International USA. Retrieved 31 May 2010.
Raeburn, Paul. "AAP sputters, then retracts policy on female genital cutting." PsychologyToday.com. 27 May 2010.
-----------------------
HERETIC MUSLIM TERROR GROUPS- WANT ALL WOMEN CASTRATED-.... ISIS IS VERY LOUD ABOUT IT....
What about our world's 270 Girls ....... tell me... if they were rich white girls/boys..... would they be home now??? United Nations needs 2 disband.... humanity needs a new world order...imho
ISIS orders women and girls in Iraq city to undergo female genital mutilation, UN official claims
Forced genital mutilation could affect as many as four million women and girls if ISIS carries through with such a plan. The hard-line Islamist group has not commented on the allegation but NPR Cairo bureau chief Leila Fadel said Thursday that residents of Mosul disputed the UN’s claim.
Ishmael N. Daro, Postmedia News | July 24, 2014
http://news.nationalpost.com/2014/07/24/isis-orders-all-women-and-girls-in-iraq-city-to-undergo-female-genital-mutilation-un/
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.