HAPPY 100th Winnie The Pooh – From Canada’s WWI commemorating memories over Winnie Mascot of Winnipeg troops – beautiful storey of beautiful stories 4 the child in each of us... and our children ... and theirs...
AUGUST 24 2014: CANADA WWI BEAR FROM TROOPS IN CANADA- CALLED WINNIE- WENT 2 ZOO IN BRITAIN- BECAME ..... storyline 4 WINNIE THE POOH.... glorious Winnie The Pooh
STORY
During the first World War, troops from Winnipeg (Manitoba, Canada) were being transported to eastern Canada, on their way to Europe, where they were to join the 2nd Canadian Infantry Brigade. When the train stopped at White River, Ontario, a lieutenant called Harry Colebourn bought a small female black bear cub for $20 from a hunter who had killed its mother. He named her 'Winnipeg', after his hometown of Winnipeg, or 'Winnie' for short.
Winnie became the mascot of the Brigade and went to Britain with the unit. When the Brigade was posted to the battlefields of France, Colebourn, now a Captain, took Winnie to the London Zoo for a long loan. He formally presented the London Zoo with Winnie in December 1919 where he became a popular attraction and lived until 1934.
The bear was also very popular with Christopher Robin, son of author A.A. Milne. It was his favourite animal at the Zoo, and he often spent time inside the cage with it. The bear was Christopher Robin's inspiration for calling his own teddy bear Winnie... Winnie the Pooh (this teddy bear started out with the name of Edward Bear). The name Pooh originally belonged to a swan, as can be seen in the introduction of Milne's 'When We Were Very Young'.
A.A. Milne started to write a series of books about Winnie the Pooh, his son Christopher Robin, and their friends in theHundred Acre Wood. These other characters, such as Eeyore, Piglet, Tigger, Kanga and Roo were also based onstuffed animals belonging to Christopher Robin. The characters, Rabbit and Owl, were based on animals that lived, like the swan Pooh, in the surrounding area of Milne's country home, Cotchford Farm in Ashdown Forest, Sussex. It is this area on which the 100-Acre-Wood was based.
'Winnie-the-Pooh' was published by Methuen on October 14th, 1926, the verses 'Now We are Six' in 1927, and 'The House at Pooh Corner' in 1928. All these books were illustrated in a beautiful way by E.H. Shepard, which made the books even more magical. The Pooh-books became firm favorites with old and young alike and have been translated into almost every known language. A conservative figure for the total sales of the four Methuen editions (including When We Were Very Young) up to the end of 1996 would be over 20 million copies. These figures do not include sales of the four books published by Dutton in Canada and the States, nor the foreign-language editions printed in more than 25 languages the world over!
The Pooh-books had also been favourites of Walt Disney's daughters and it inspired Disney to bring Pooh to film in 1966. In 1977 'the Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh', the first feature-length animated film of Pooh was released. In 1993, the Walt Disney Company acknowledged that Pooh Bear is second only to Mickey Mouse in their portfolio of the most-loved and trusted characters known to millions of people all over the world. By 1996, after the second release of 'the Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh', the Bear of Very Little Brain had proven to be more popular than any other Disney character. In 1997, twenty years after the release of the first feature-length animated film, Disney released 'Pooh's Grand Adventure', picking up where Disney's 22nd Masterpiece left off. In February 2000 Disney released the third Winnie the Pooh movie called 'The Tigger Movie', this time with the leading part for Tigger.
Glasgow XX Commonwealth Games 2014 Incredible- beautiful -tears of joyous pride
OUR CANADA- Where Women Equal Men/2 Official Languages/ Over 200 Cultures- young, beautiful, smart, savvy and free- O Canada we love u
100 years ago 2da - Canada WWI 59 MILLION PEOPLE KILLED IN THIS WAR 1914- USA joined 1916- War Ended 1917
CANADA - NEW FRANCE (Canadian Encyclopedia)
New France
France was a colonial power in North America from the early 16th century, the age of European discoveries and fishing expeditions, to the early 19th century, when Napoléon Bonaparte sold Louisiana to the United States.
Indigenous peoples had been living on this territory for millennia. That is, well before the Vikings ventured so far East (see Norse voyages) at the end of the 10th Century. From the founding of Québec in 1608 to the ceding of Canada to Britain in 1763, France placed its stamp upon the history of the continent, much of whose lands — including Acadia, the vast territory of Louisiana and the Mississippi Valley — lay under its control. The populations it established, especially in the St. Lawrence Valley (see St. Lawrence Lowland), are still full of vitality today.
Founding and Context
France became interested in the North America later than the other Western Christian powers — England, Spain and Portugal — and after the trips made by Christopher Columbus in 1492, John Cabot in 1497 and the Corte-Real brothers (see also Portuguese) in 1501 and 1502. In 1524 Giovanni da Verrazzano followed the eastern shore of America from Florida to Newfoundland. Jacques Cartier then made three voyages of discovery for France. He took possession of the territory in the name of the king of France by planting a cross on the shores of the Gaspé (see Gaspé Peninsula) in 1534. The next year, he sailed up the St. Lawrence River and visited Aboriginal settlements at Stadacona (site of present-day Québec) and Hochelaga (Montréal). He spent the winter at Stadacona, where 25 of his men died of scurvy, and returned to France in 1536.In 1541–42 he returned, establishing a short-lived colony, which he called "Charlesbourg- Royal," at the mouth of the rivière du Cap-Rouge (see Cap-Rouge) near Stadacona. Religion gave the impetus to his voyages, but economic motives were even more obvious. The hope of finding a Northwest Passage to the Indies and the fabled Kingdom of the Saguenay was constantly stressed. Cartier brought back to France some minerals from this final voyage that he thought were gold and diamonds, but were only iron pyrite and quartz (see Diamonds of Canada). After these initial disappointments, France turned its attention elsewhere and ignored the distant land until the end of the century.
Meanwhile, some French colonists showed sustained interest in the region's fisheries. There are reports of Basque, Breton and Norman fishermen on Newfoundland’s Grand Banks as early as the first decade of the 16th century. Each year more ships — a dozen or so in the decade 1520–30, about 100 by mid-century — made fishing trips. By 1550, fishermen were drying their catch on the shores, making contact with Aboriginal peoples and taking furs back to France. In the 1580s, ship owners were leaving fishing for the fur trade, an activity that drew the French farther into the continent.
In 1608 Samuel de Champlain, considered the founder of New France, erected a habitation (building) at Québec. He continued Cartier's dream of finding an opening to the Indies, pursued the commercial interests of businessmen in France, his sponsors, and followed the king's wishes. The settlement responded to economic demands: go out to the fur-rich areas, forge close contact with suppliers and try to obtain the right of exploitation. The scale of the operation made it necessary to form private companies.
Commercial Administration of the Colony and Missionary Work
The colony's administration, 1608–63, was entrusted commercial companies that were formed by merchants from various cities in France. Succeeding companies promised to settle and develop the French land in America in return for exclusive rights to its resources. The Compagnie des Cent-Associés, created by the great minister of Louis XIII, Cardinal de Richelieu, ran New France 1627–63, either directly or through subsidiary companies. It did not achieve the desired results. In 1663, the population numbered scarcely 3,000 people, 1,250 of them Canadian-born. Less than one per cent of the granted land was being exploited. Of the 5 million livres' worth of possible annual resources enumerated by Champlain in 1618 — e.g., fish, mines, wood, hemp, cloth and fur — only fur yielded an appreciable return, and it was irregular and disappointing.Nor was evangelization among Indigenous peoples flourishing. During its first half-century, New France experienced an explosion of missionary fervour (see Missions and Missionaries), as demonstrated by the number and zeal of its apostles, inspired by the Catholic Counter-Reformation (see Catholicism). In 1634, the Jesuits renewed the mission of Sainte-Marie Among the Hurons in the western wilds. Ville-Marie, which became Montréal, was the work of mystics and the devoted. But the missionaries managed to convert very few Aboriginal persons.
Various political and military events hindered colonization efforts. The alliances formed by Champlain made enemies of the Iroquois. Québec fell to the freebooting Kirke brothers in 1629. The Iroquois nations grew belligerent as soon as the country was returned to France in 1632. Between 1648 and 1652 they destroyed Huronia, a hub of French commercial and missionary activity. Attacks on the very heart of the colony demonstrated that its survival was in doubt (see Iroquois Wars).
In 1663, Québec was just a commercial branch operation: the fur trade was opposed to agriculture (see History of Agriculture); the French population was small; and the administration of the colony by commercial exploiters was a disaster. The company relinquished control of the colony to the king.
Royal Rule Facilitates Development
Under Louis XIV New France flourished. He made the colony a province of France, giving it a similar hierarchical administrative organization. He watched over its settlement, extended its territory and allowed its enterprises to multiply. However, he had first to guarantee the peace.Under the marquis de Tracy, the Carignan-Salières Regiment built forts, ravaged Iroquois villages and demonstrated French military power. The Iroquois made peace, and 400 soldiers stayed in the colony as settlers. The king also had 850 young women sent out as brides-to-be, and quick marriages and families were encouraged. When the offspring of these Filles du Roi came of age 20 years later, the demographic situation had changed. In 1663 there had been one woman to every 6 men; now the sexes were roughly equal in number. The colony thereafter replenished 90 per cent of its numbers through childbirth.
Under the authority of Jean-Baptiste Colbert, comptroller general of finances and then navy minister (see Ministère de la Marine), colonial administration was entrusted to a Gouverneur (for military matters and external relations) and an Intendant (for justice, civil administration and finances — i.e., all civil aspects of colonial administration). The Sovereign Council (Superior Council after 1703) acted as a court of appeal and registered the king's edicts.
Exploration and Further Economic Expansion
The imperialism of Louis XIV, the pacification of the Iroquois and the need to rebuild the network of fur-trade treaties led to renewed Explorations into the Great Lakes and Mississippi regions by such exceptional people as François Dollier de Casson, Louis Jolliet, Jacques Marquette and the Cavelier de La Salle. But the Iroquois Wars started again in 1682 and the colony found new heroes, such as Pierre Le Moyne d'Iberville. Political, military and missionary activity, combined with economic factors, created a need for furs to be acquired from Aboriginal peoples.Intendant Jean Talon, with Colbert's solid backing and other favourable circumstances, started a vigorous development program. In addition to watching over agriculture and the fur trade, Talon began ventures such as shipbuilding, trade with the West Indies, commercial crops like flax and hemp, fishing industries and a brewery. But by the time he left in 1672, economic circumstances had changed and virtually nothing remained of these premature initiatives.
It is difficult to identify the major elements of this nascent society. For Acadia, familiar features are the quality of its agricultural establishments, the importance of fishing and the alternating British and French regimes. In the St. Lawrence Valley, farmers, though in the majority, were still clearing the land. Craftsmen no longer had the support of major enterprises. Fur traders were being squeezed by increasingly difficult regulations and economic circumstances, yet they provided the colony's only exports. Military officers, thanks to the introduction of coin currency and the presence of opportunities to flaunt themselves, enjoyed some prestige by entering into business and being in the governor's entourage.
The seigneur had little revenue and took his standing from his title and the exercise of functions entirely unrelated to the land (see Seigneurial System). Social mobility was still possible and caused categories and groups to mingle, but there were two worlds: the city and the country.
End of Expansion and Beginning of Economic Crisis
New France reached its greatest territorial extent at the start of the 18th century. About 250 people lived in a dozen settlements in Newfoundland, and there were about 1,500 in Acadia. Several hundred lived around the mouth of the Mississippi and around the Great Lakes. People from the St Lawrence Valley lived on the shoreline of Labrador as fishermen. The Saguenay River Basin (the King's Domain) had a few trading posts. Canada had about 20,000 inhabitants, most of them farmers scattered along a ribbon of settlement between the two urban centres of Québec and Montréal. In the West, a series of trading posts and forts dotted the communication lines. Finally, in the 1740s, the La Vérendrye family carried the exploration of the continent right to the foothills of the Rockies.Despite this expansion, New France has been described as a "colossus with feet of clay." The British American colonies were 20 times as populous and felt themselves encircled and at risk. Through the Treaty of Utrecht of 1713, which ended the War of the Spanish Succession, France yielded Newfoundland, the Acadian peninsula, Hudson Bay and supremacy in trade over the Iroquois to the English. Furthermore the early 18th century brought a major economic crisis in the colony. Its main export item, fur, was hit by a European sales slump, declining quality and less attractive returns. The many young people who had just come to settle the country had no choice but to fall back on the land.
Peacetime Recovery
Recovery was slow, but the economy experienced an unprecedented boom during the long period of peace, 1713–44. France built an imposing fortress at Louisbourg to protect its fishing zones, land and commercial trade with the colony. After 1720, agricultural surpluses were exported to Île Royale (Cape Breton Island) and the French West Indies. Some 200 seigneurs lived in the territory of Canada. A high birthrate led to a rapid population increase, which in turn led to the creation of parishes. Despite the strictures of mercantilism, two major industries were established: the Forges Saint-Maurice and royal shipbuilding (see Shipbuilding and Ship repair).In 1735, a road linked Québec City and Montréal for the first time. Yet the fur trade still accounted for 70 per cent of the colony's exports. And peace was being used to prepare for war: 80 per cent of the colony's budgets (which never equalled the sums spent on the king's amusements) went to military expenses. Much more was spent on constructing European-style fortifications than on strengthening alliances with Aboriginal peoples.
Colonial society, influenced by the French elite that led it, modelled itself on the mother country, yet increasingly grew apart from it because of the colony's small population and very different, land-based, economic and geographic circumstances. Nobles, the middle class, military officers, seigneurs, civil administrators and traders formed a high society which was extremely sensitive to the favours of the colonial authorities. Eighty percent of the population lived on and by the land. Each generation produced new pioneers who cleared and settled land, acclimatized themselves, managed some new territory and came to know their neighbours. The acquisition of this territory in America by French descendants was characterized by the importance of the land, of inheritance, of economic independence and of analyzed social relationships.
The Conquest
France felt that New France cost much and yielded little. The expensive but inconclusive War of the Austrian Succession, which ended in 1748, saw the destruction of French overseas trade by Britain. The Seven Years’ War found France on the defensive against England, now an aggressive maritime power. The British colonies, with 1.5 million inhabitants, were pitted against a mere 70,000 French colonists, a sign of the very limited success of French colonization in North America.After some spectacular military successes, the result of strategy well adapted to the local terrain, France fell back on the defensive. On 13 September 1759, the troops of General James Wolfe defeated those of the Marquis de Montcalm in the Battle of the Plains of Abraham near Québec City. Montréal fell the next year. France yielded its colony to England in the Treaty of Paris (1763). It was the end, or nearly so, of French political power in America — but not of French presence. France left a great legacy to America: the Canadiens. They refused assimilation and affirmed their existence. Protected by their language, religion and institutions, concentrated in a limited geographic area, difficult to penetrate, they developed a way of life, social customs and attitudes of their own. Having become Québécois, they continued to strive to develop their nationality.
http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/new-france/
----------------
CANADA MILITARY NEWS:
Born a citizen of the British Empire.... look at our First Peoples
10,000 years and our family in Canada since 1632- Lawn, Placentia Bay
Newfoundland as Roman Catholics- and on this day... God Bless our Canadian
Military, Militia, Reservists and Ranger die 4 our Canada coming home wounded,
dead and souls stolen by incredible cruelty of Muslims killing innocent Muslims- ON THIS DAY... God bless our Canada, God
bless our Israel and God bless the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan/CANADA
BRITISH EMPIRE-COMMONWEALTH HISTORY/CITIZENSHIP/DUAL/WAR 1812-WHO WE ARE...
BLOGGED:
GLASGOW 2014 XX COMMONWEALTH GAMES-PARAGAMES- July
23 Aug 3- Come getcha Canada and Scotland on with 2.2 BILLION
FOLKS CHEERING
and..
BLOGGED:
CANADA MILITARY NEWS: South Pole Wounded Warriors Allied Challenge-Incredible story and victory of 4 counries of Wounded Warriors - Antartica 2 South Pole- Victory run/walk success- in harshest climates- UK/Canada/Australia and USA- The Journey and success proving 2 a billion folks proudly- disabilities are abilities in disguise- did we make u proud- u surely did and do..Environmentalists could NOT make it.... u ran and walked it.... the world rejoiced and Santa and NORAD hugged u along the way.The Journey 2 Victory blogged daily- December 2013/O CANADA TROOPS- we love u so- honour
History of Canadian nationality law
Canada established its own nationality
law in 1946 with the enactment of the Canadian Citizenship Act 1946, which took effect on 1 January 1947. It was the
second nation in the then British
Commonwealth to
establish its own nationality law; the first was the Irish Free State, which was a Commonwealth member
until 1949 and established its own nationality law in 1935.
Under
current Canadian law, Canada does not restrict dual citizenship but Passport Canada encourages its citizens to
travel abroad on their Canadian passport, so they can access Canadian consular services.
--------------
CANADIAN Citizenship
The
Citizenship Act, which is the current nationality legislation in force in
Canada, came into effect on 15 February 1977.
Citizenship
The
Citizenship Act, which is the current nationality legislation in force in
Canada, came into effect on 15 February 1977. It defines "citizen" as
"a Canadian citizen" and provides that both native-born and
naturalized citizens are equally entitled to all the rights, powers and
privileges and subject to all the obligations, duties and liabilities of a
citizen, which are governed by numerous provincial and federal laws and the Constitution Act. In all
provinces and in the federal jurisdiction, citizens of the age of majority are
guaranteed political rights including the right to vote and run for office.
Before
1947
Canada's Naturalization Acts conferred British subject status on immigrants being naturalized in Canada and on native-born alike. The Canadian Citizenship Act, the first nationality statute in Canada to define its people as Canadians, came into force on 1 January 1947. Among other things, the Act gave married women full authority over their nationality status. From 1947 onwards women have neither gained nor lost Canadian nationality status through marriage. Under nationality legislation in effect prior to 1947, a married woman's nationality status in Canada had, for the most part, been linked to that of her husband.
Canada's Naturalization Acts conferred British subject status on immigrants being naturalized in Canada and on native-born alike. The Canadian Citizenship Act, the first nationality statute in Canada to define its people as Canadians, came into force on 1 January 1947. Among other things, the Act gave married women full authority over their nationality status. From 1947 onwards women have neither gained nor lost Canadian nationality status through marriage. Under nationality legislation in effect prior to 1947, a married woman's nationality status in Canada had, for the most part, been linked to that of her husband.
The
Citizenship Act of 1976
The Citizenship Act of 1976 recognized the equality of women in citizenship matters and as well removed the remaining differences between groups of people seeking to become citizens. All persons born in Canada are, with minor exceptions (eg, children of diplomats), Canadian citizens at birth.
The Citizenship Act of 1976 recognized the equality of women in citizenship matters and as well removed the remaining differences between groups of people seeking to become citizens. All persons born in Canada are, with minor exceptions (eg, children of diplomats), Canadian citizens at birth.
Children
born abroad on or after 15 February 1977 are automatically citizens if either
parent was a citizen at the time of birth. However, children born abroad in the
second and succeeding generations of children so born from that date are
required before the age of 28 to apply to retain citizenship, to register as a
citizen and either live in Canada for one year prior to making the application
or have established a substantial connection with Canada. Children under the
age of majority, one or both of whose parents have become citizens, are also
eligible for citizenship, provided an application for citizenship is made on
their behalf and they have been admitted to Canada for permanent residence by
the immigration authorities. Adult persons who have been admitted to Canada for
permanent residence may qualify for citizenship after 3 or more years of
residence in Canada and the fulfilment of certain other conditions. The
minister responsible for citizenship at present, the Minister of Citizenship
and Immigration, has the discretion to waive some requirements for citizenship
and the governor-in-council has the discretionary power to direct the grant of
citizenship to any person to alleviate cases of special and unusual hardship or
to reward services of an exceptional value to Canada. This latter power is
rarely used but in a world community aware of human needs it could prove
significant.
The
1976 Immigration Act (s4)
Under the 1976 Immigration Act (s4) Canadian citizens have the absolute right to enter and live in Canada. This right also pertains to natives under the Indian Act whether or not they are citizens. Permanent residents and Convention Refugees who are allowed certain rights in Canada are also subject to certain restrictions. Only Canadian citizens are eligible to obtain Canadian passports, although permanent residents may be granted a travel document. Many Canadian professional associations, eg, law societies and medical associations, require practitioners of their profession to be citizens.
Under the 1976 Immigration Act (s4) Canadian citizens have the absolute right to enter and live in Canada. This right also pertains to natives under the Indian Act whether or not they are citizens. Permanent residents and Convention Refugees who are allowed certain rights in Canada are also subject to certain restrictions. Only Canadian citizens are eligible to obtain Canadian passports, although permanent residents may be granted a travel document. Many Canadian professional associations, eg, law societies and medical associations, require practitioners of their profession to be citizens.
At
present, an application for the grant, retention, renunciation or resumption of
citizenship (except for the grant of citizenship made on behalf of a minor) is
initially considered by a citizenship judge. Both the minister and the person
concerned have the right to appeal the judge's decision to the federal court,
trial division. The governor-in-council may refuse an application for the
grant, resumption, or renunciation of citizenship but the grounds for this are
narrow. Both the grant of citizenship and the renunciation of citizenship can
be revoked by the governor-in-council if obtained by fraud, misrepresentation
or concealment of material circumstances. A person who was admitted to Canada
for permanent residence under false pretenses is deemed to have obtained
Canadian citizenship by false pretenses as well. The revocation is made by the
governor-in-council following a report made by the minister which can only be
made after the person has been notified of his or her right to have the case
referred to the federal court, trial division.
The
issue of revocation has acquired notoriety in recent years because of the
controversy which surrounds the granting of citizenship to alleged Nazi war
criminals. There could be doubt about the constitutionality of revocation,
because the possibility creates a distinction between naturalized and
native-born citizens which might run afoul of s15 of the Canadian Charter of
Rights and Freedoms.
Citizens
residing in Canada may not renounce their citizenship unless permitted to do so
by the minister. Those who have ceased to be citizens may resume citizenship
after being admitted to Canada for permanent residence and residing in Canada
for at least one year following such admission and immediately preceding the
date of application. Canadian citizens may hold any number of citizenships at
the same time, providing the other country or countries concerned also
recognize the concept of dual or plural nationality. Citizens of other
Commonwealth countries and Ireland are recognized as Commonwealth citizens in
Canada, a status which is viewed as symbolic.
A
new Citizenship Act is before Parliament (1996). The legislation will attempt
to streamline the citizenship process. Proposals in the new legislation
include: the elimination of the position of Citizenship judge, the amendment of
the oath of Citizenship and the inclusion of a more detailed definition of
residency. The ceremonies granting citizenship will take place in community
venues and will be presided over by prominent Canadians (eg, recipients of the
Order of Canada). The present system of interviews with Citizenship Judges will
be replaced with written tests.
Noncitizens
Noncitizens in Canada do not enjoy political rights but generally have all legal rights and are subject to the law in the same way as citizens. Permanent residents are entitled to work in Canada, while visitors usually are not.
Noncitizens in Canada do not enjoy political rights but generally have all legal rights and are subject to the law in the same way as citizens. Permanent residents are entitled to work in Canada, while visitors usually are not.
CANADA Immigration
The
movement of nationals of one country into another for the purpose of
resettlement, is central to Canadian history, from the native peoples, whose
ancestors migrated across the Bering Strait from Asia, to the most recent arrivals.
The movement of nationals of one country into another for the purpose of
resettlement, is central to Canadian history, from the native peoples, whose
ancestors migrated across the Bering Strait from Asia, to the most recent
arrivals. The story of Canadian immigration is not one of orderly population
growth; it has been and remains both a catalyst to Canadian economic
development and a mirror of Canadian attitudes and values; it has often been
unashamedly and economically self-serving and ethnically or racially biased.
Immigration to New France
Throughout
the 17th and much of the 18th century, European colonial administrations,
charged with overseeing what would become Canada, did not consider settlement a
priority. French or British governments initially seemed unprepared to expend
vast quantities of money or energy necessary to encourage settlement. Nor was
migration to the New World popular in France or Britain. Adventurers, explorers
and particularly traders acting for British or French interests feared the
interference of settlers in the lucrative trade with the native people.
However,
policy eventually changed and colonial authorities carefully and slowly
encouraged settlement in Canada, hoping that settlers would guarantee the
sovereignty of colonial land claims, would Christianize the native peoples, and
would exploit the natural resources, often on behalf of European investors.
Settlements grew gradually and not without difficulty. New France's population
at the time of the British Conquest (1759-60) was about 65 000. In
Nova Scotia a transplanted Scottish community was supplemented by German and
Swiss settlers, and in the late 1700s Irish settlers reinforced Newfoundland's
population.
Although
the British victory brought an end to migration from France, it did not
instigate a tide of English-speaking immigrants. Except for a handful of
British administrators, military personnel and merchants who filled the vacuum
left by their departing French counterparts, few English-speaking settlers
seemed interested in Canada. Indeed, it is doubtful whether settlers would have
been welcomed by the new British administrators, who feared that an influx of
English-speaking, Protestant settlers would complicate administration in a
recently conquered Roman Catholic, French-speaking territory. Most British
immigrants were far more inclined to seek out the more temperate climate and
familiar social institutions of the British colonies to the south.
The Loyalist Immigration
Many of
Québec's new British rulers, content to leave the colony to languish as a quiet
backwater of the Empire, were soon forced to accept many thousands of
English-speaking, largely Protestant settlers displaced by the American
Revolution. Known as United Empire Loyalists, they were largely political refugees. Many of them migrated northward
not by choice but by default, either because they did not wish to become
citizens of the new American republic or because they feared retribution for
their public support of the British. For these Loyalists, who eventually formed
the core of the colony's ruling oligarchies, Canada was a land of second
choice, as it would be for countless future immigrants who came because to
remain at home was undesirable, and entry elsewhere, often the US, was
restricted.
The
Loyalist migration was neither uncontrolled nor unassisted, however. Imperial
authorities and military personnel offered supplies to the new settlers and
organized the distribution of land. Despite the hardships the settlers endured,
their plight was undeniably made less severe by the intervention of government
agents, a practice to be repeated in Canada many times.
Throughout
the mid-19th century, the colonies, Canada West in particular, returned to a
pattern of painfully slow and erratic economic growth. Officially encouraged
immigration from England, Scotland and even the US gradually filled the better
agricultural lands in the colony and bolstered new commercial or administrative
towns. The new immigrants were generally of ethnic stock and outlook similar to
that of the established community. But the great Irish potato famine and to a
lesser degree a series of abortive European rebellions in 1848 sent new waves
of immigrants to North America.
Of these
tens of thousands, many were Irish settlers, whose arrival in Canada initiated
major social and economic changes. In many respects the Irish were Canada's first enormous
wave of foreign immigrants. Although they generally spoke English, they did not
mirror the social, cultural or religious values of the majority. Roman Catholic
intruders in a Protestant domain, their loyalty to the Crown appeared suspect
in a Canada where ardent loyalty was demanded as insurance against the threat
of American republicanism. Furthermore, after escaping a life in which farm
tenancy and capricious nature made agriculture synonymous with poverty and
dependency, some of the famine-stricken Irish had little or no enthusiasm for
farm life.
Canadian
cities and larger towns quickly developed Irish sections or wards. The
Anglo-Protestant majority measured the Irish contribution economically and the
Irish deficiencies socially, religiously and racially. On the one hand, many of
the Irish created a labour force ready and able to fill the seasonal employment
demands of a newly expanded canal system, lumber industry and burgeoning
railway network; on the other hand, because of their low income, their
Catholicism, the seasonal separation from their families and differences in
their way of life, they were a conspicuous minority group. They filled
working-class neighbourhoods and inflated majority fears of social evils
previously dismissed as peculiar to the US.
For some
years the Irish supplied the base of a working-class labour force necessary for
the slow advance of communication, commerce and industry, but they remained an
adjunct to, rather than a central component of, mainstream North American
economic and social life - the basis of which was commerce and agricultural
activity. Policy tied population increase to land settlement. Gradual
commercial and industrial development usually serviced the agricultural sector,
and, because many Irish were not farmers, Irish labourers were seen as
rootless.
The Great Western Migration
If agricultural roots and commitment were measured, in part, by land
tenure, Canada underwent a shock when arable land began to disappear from the
market. Without a large industrial base, with a relatively low death rate, a
high birthrate and a small but continual inflow of immigration largely from the
British Isles, the immediate post-Confederation era had its overpopulation
problems. The US, with its seemingly boundless supply of free, fertile land,
attracted thousands of new immigrants and Anglo-Canadians, while French
Canadians were drawn to jobs in the factories of New England.
Canadian
history has been compared to a journey through the Bible, beginning in
Lamentations and ending in Exodus, but in the late 19th century Canada's future
Prairie provinces were opened to settlement, although it was not until a market
developed for the prairie agricultural output that serious settlement began.
The demand for farm goods, especially hard wheat, coincided with the election
of Wilfrid Laurier's government, which immediately encouraged the settlement of
the West with large-scale immigration. Canada's new and aggressive minister of
the interior, Clifford Sifton, organized a revamped and
far-reaching program and was prepared, if reluctantly, to admit agricultural
settlers from places other than the British Isles, Northern Europe and the US,
explaining, "A stalwart peasant in a sheepskin coat, born on the soil,
whose forefathers have been farmers for ten generations, and a stout wife and a
half-dozen children is good quality."
The
Sifton comment, however, no matter how often repeated, is not an accurate
reflection of government policy. From 1896 to the 1930s, Canadians, their
politicians and immigration officials were not receptive to peasants in
sheepskin coats. Immigration policy did not involve just an aggressive peopling
of the Prairies. It was enacted within the framework of the British Empire, in
which Sifton, the Canadian government and most English-speaking Canadians believed.
For
English-speaking Canadians the traditional definition of ideal immigrants may
have been modified but was not radically altered. Unabashedly colonial, the
government defined immigrants who did not originate from the British Isles as
foreign; and, unabashedly North American, excluded white, English- speaking
immigrants from the US from this category. The ideal immigrants were still
British or American independent farmers who would settle in the West. Sifton
and the government may only have reflected their times, but Canadian
immigration policy and public opinion were nevertheless racist.
Pressed to increase immigration by business and railway interests with
visions of an insatiable world demand for Canadian resources, Sifton and his
immigration authorities balanced their ethnic anxieties against a frantic
search for settlers. They listed ideal settlers in a descending preference.
British and American agriculturalists were followed by French, Belgians, Dutch,
Scandinavians, Swiss, Finns, Russians, Austro-Hungarians, Germans, Ukrainians
and Poles. Close to the bottom of the list came those who were, in both the
public and the government's minds, less assimilable and less desirable, eg,
Italians, South Slavs, Greeks and Syrians. At the very bottom came Jews,
Asians, gypsies and blacks.
Ottawa,
however, did not have the only voice when it came to immigration. The British
North America Act also gave the provinces a voice in immigration if they chose
to run it. Québec, partly in response to the expansion of English-speaking
Canada and partly in an effort to stem if not reverse the flow of rural Québec
youth to waiting jobs in New England factories, set up its own immigration
department. In co-operation with federal authorities, immigration agents were
sent into New England to encourage French Canadians to return home to recently
opened marginal agricultural lands. The program met with only limited success,
but Québec's active determination of its own immigration priorities continued.
In spite of government precautions, not all immigrants committed
themselves to resource exploitation or agriculture. Like the Irish before them,
many of the "foreign" immigrants, non-English speaking and largely
non-Protestant, rejected a life of rural isolation, choosing to work in cities.
Furthermore, many of these foreigners saw themselves as living in Canada or
North America only temporarily, earning enough money to buy a piece of land at
home, to assemble a dowry for a sister or to pay off a family debt. But the
many who adopted North American definitions of success or who were unable to
return home because of political upheavals established themselves in Canada,
bringing wives and children to join them.
If these Jews, Italians, Macedonians, Russians, Finns, Chinese, etc, had
been content to play the role reluctantly left for them, if they had accepted
rural isolation as the price of their admission into Canada, hostility toward
them might have been minimal; but by making their way into Montréal, Winnipeg,
Toronto, Hamilton and Vancouver and other centres, they awakened the old ethnic
and religious anxieties and prejudices previously reserved for the Irish. They
had been allowed into Canada to satisfy the need for a cheap labour force or a
pool of skilled craftsmen adaptable to factory and construction.
They were
prepared to accept seasonal labour in mining or lumbering (which forced them to
drift back into cities during the off-season), but for many Canadians the
sudden influx of strange peoples so recently subject to foreign czars, kaisers
and gods seemed to threaten the very fabric of Protestant Canadian society.
Some Canadians responded with a dignified tolerance. They recognized that these
foreigners were here to stay, that their labour and skills were necessary,
their living conditions subject to improvement and, perhaps most important,
that their children would become integrated, given education and time. But in
spite of the vital economic role these immigrants played in urban centres -
laying streetcar tracks, labouring in the expanding textile factories and
digging the sewer sytems - many Canadians demanded strict enforcement of
immigration regulations and restriction of admission along ethnic or racial
lines.
During
WWI anti-German hysteria erupted in Canada, directed largely against immigrants
born in the now enemy countries or those who entered Canada as subjects of
enemy monarchs, but also against foreigners who had been born in now allied
countries or had come to Canada as subjects of allied monarchs. Despite Canadian
military manpower needs, British and Canadian authorities alike felt that,
where possible, foreigners belonged in foreign armies. Groups such as Italians,
Serbians, Poles and some Jews were encouraged to return to the armies of their
mother country or were recruited into specific British army units reserved for
allied foreigners of various origins. Without national armies of their own to
join, many Jews, Macedonians and Ukrainians volunteered for the Canadian Army.
Once in
Canada, many thousands of immigrants did find a place for themselves and their
families, but Canadian immigration policy and administration, which bowed to
economic necessity by allowing these southern and eastern Europeans into
Canada, could not bend enough to admit other would-be immigrants. Head taxes,
landing taxes, bilateral restriction agreements and travel restrictions
virtually prohibited the immigration of Asians. Canadian authorities refused to
allow the settlement of female Asian immigrants, fearing this would encourage
Asian men temporarily in Canada as railway or mine labourers to settle
permanently and, perhaps more importantly, become the parents of yet another
generation of the "yellow peril."
In 1914
almost 400 East Indians aboard the immigrant ship Komagata Maru languished in Vancouver harbour
while Canadian authorities debated what to do with them. Canada's new navy, in
action for the first time, escorted the ship from Canadian waters while many Vancouver
residents cheered approvingly from shore. In 1910 and 1911 rumours had spread
that a group of blacks was preparing to migrate to central Alberta. Descendants
of freed slaves, they were being pushed from their land in Oklahoma territory,
where they had been granted holdings and hoped to build new lives.
Public
and political response in Alberta was immediate and predictable. Federal
authorities initiated an ingeniously simple scheme. Nothing in the Immigration
Act specifically barred black Americans, but any immigrant could effectively be
denied access to Canada for health reasons under the Act's medical provisions.
The government merely instructed immigration inspectors and their medical aides
along the American border to reject all blacks as unfit for admission on
medical grounds. There was no appeal. Blacks were warned they should not waste
their time and money by considering immigration to Canada.
As a
result of the dramatic and devastating economic collapse caused by the Great Depression, the need for the government's
selective encouragement of immigration faded. Immigration authorities worked
not to stimulate admissions but to prevent them. By 1933 Hitler ruled Germany,
and millions of political opponents and Jews might have survived if Canada or
other countries had offered innocent victims a home. Although many Canadians
responded to the refugees with a mixture of sympathy for their desperate plight
and embarrassment at the lack of government aid, others, including the federal
Cabinet, many in the diplomatic corps and, of course, immigration policymakers,
reacted with alarm to any pressure to accept Jews or political refugees
escaping Germany. As a result, few refugees were able to break Canadian
immigration restrictions.
The Postwar Era and the Removal of Racial and
Ethnic Barriers
At war's
end in 1945, Canadian immigration regulations remained unchanged from the
restrictive prewar years. But change was not long in coming. Driven by a
postwar economic boom, growing job market and a resulting demand for labour,
Canada gradually re-opened its doors to European immigration, first to
immigrants Canada traditionally preferred - those from the United Kingdom and
Western Europe - but eventually to the rest of Europe as well. With the onset
of the Cold War, however, immigration from Eastern Europe came to a halt.
Borders to the west were closed by the Soviet Union and its allies. However,
large numbers of immigrants entered Canada from southern Europe, particularly
Italy, Greece and Portugal.
Unlike
the mass immigration of an earlier era, this postwar immigration was not
streamed exclusively into agricultural or rural-based resource extractive
industries such as mining or lumbering. Canada emerged from World War II as an
urban, industrial power, and many postwar immigrants soon filled jobs in the
new urban-based manufacturing and construction sectors, some building the
expanding city infrastructure and others, the better educated immigrants,
meeting the strong demand for trained and skilled professionals.
Canadian
immigration also underwent other dramatic changes in the postwar years.
Canadian governments, federal and provincial, slowly yielded to pressure for
human rights reform from an earlier generation of immigrants and their
children. Increasingly middle class and politically active, the now
well-integrated immigrants had sacrificed in common cause with other Canadians
in the war effort and in the postwar era they refused to assume second-class
status in the country they had helped to protect. Supported by like-minded
Canadians, they rejected legally sanctioned ethnic and racial discrimination in
Canada and demanded human rights reform. They forced governments to legislate against
discrimination on account of race, religion and origin in such areas as
employment, accommodation and education. And, just as Canada was making
discrimination illegal at home, the federal government moved to eliminate
racial, religious or ethnic barriers to Canadian immigration.
The last
vestiges of racial discrimination in immigration were gone from Canadian
immigration legislation and regulations by the late 1960s. This opened Canada's
doors to many of those who would previously have been rejected as undersirable.
In 1971, for the first time in Canadian history, the majority of those
immigrating into Canada were of non-European ancestry. This has been the case
every year since. As a result, today Canada is not just a multicultural
society, it is also a multiracial society to a degree unimaginable to earlier
generations of Canadians.
That does
not mean that anyone who wishes to enter Canada may do so. Far from it. While
restrictions on account of race or national origin are gone, Canada still
maintains strict criteria for determining who is and who is not a desirable
candidate for Canadian entry. In the late 1960s Canada introduced a point
system for determining the desirability of individuals applying to immigrate to
Canada.
Under
this system, each applicant was awarded points for criteria such as age,
education, ability to speak English or French and demand for that particular
applicant's job skills. If an applicant was in good health and of good
character and scored enough points, he or she was granted admission together
with their spouse and dependent children. Those who did not score enough points
were denied admission. More recently, Canada has modified its procedures to
give preference to the admission of independent, skilled, and perhaps most importantly,
immediately employable immigrants.
Once
established in Canada, each new arrival, now called a "landed
immigrant," has all the rights of born Canadians except political rights,
such as the right to vote. After a specified number of years (recently reduced
from 5 to 3 years), each landed immigrant may apply for Canadian citizenship
and, once granted, has the same political rights as Canadian-born citizens. In
addition, landed immigrants, like Canadian citizens, may also apply to sponsor
the admission to Canada of close family members who might not otherwise be able
to satisfy stringent Canadian admission criteria. The sponsor must agree to
ensure anyone brought into Canada will not become an economic burden to
Canadian society. For many years, sponsored families of those already in Canada
were the single largest group of those admitted into Canada.
Since the
end of WWII refugees and others dispossessed by war and violence have become a
significant part of Canada's immigration flow. In the postwar labour shortage
Canada admitted tens of thousands of displaced persons, individuals made
homeless by the war or who, at war's end, found themselves outside of their
country of citizenship, to which they refused to return. Among the displaced
persons were Jewish Holocaust survivors who had no community or family to which
they could return. Other displaced persons refused repatriation back to
countries which had fallen under Soviet domination. Many resettled in Canada,
where they built new lives.
During
the 1960s and 1970s Canada also responded to the plight of refugees from other
troubled areas. In the aftermath of the unsuccessful Hungarian uprising of 1967
and the crushing of political reform in Czechoslovakia by the Soviet Union in
1973, refugees fled westward. Canada responded by setting aside its normal
immigration procedures to admit its share of refugees. In the years that
followed, Canada again made special allowance for refugees from political
upheavals in Uganda, Chile and elsewhere. In each of these cases, however, the
refugees were admitted as an exception to the immigration regulations and
without following all the usual immigration procedures.
In 1978,
however, Canada enacted a new Immigration Act that, for the first time,
affirmed Canada's commitment to the resettlement of refugees from oppression;
that is, persons who have a well-founded fear of persecution in their country
of citizenship. Accordingly, refugees would no longer be admitted to Canada as
an exception to immigration regulations. Admission of refugees was now part of
Canadian immigration law and regulations. But refugee admission has remained
controversial and difficult to administer.
On the
surface the admission of refugees seems simple enough. Every year Canada sets
aside a minority portion of the total target number of immigrants it intends to
admit for refugees. But there are 2 very different routes by which refugees
have arrived in Canada. Most are carefully selected abroad. In co-operation
with other countries and international refugee agencies, each Canadian
immigration official goes overseas to interview and pick refugees for
resettlement in Canada from among those who have found temporary sanctuary
outside their country of citizenship, often in a neighbouring country. This process
has generally worked smoothly.
The first
major refugee resettlement program under this new legislation was during the
early 1980s, when Canada led the Western world in its welcome to Southeast
Asian refugees and particularly those from Vietnam, often referred to as the
"boat people." Many of the boat people were selected from among those
who escaped Vietnam in tiny boats and eventually found themselves confined to
refugee camps in Thailand or Hong Kong awaiting permanent homes.
The other
route refugees have taken into Canada is far more controversial. Canada has had
to deal with persons who are not chosen abroad by immigration officials but who
somehow make their way to Canada and, once in Canada, declare themselves to be
refugees. In recent years these have included persons who claimed refugee
status in Canada after disembarking from flights between Eastern Europe and
Cuba which land to refuel in Gander, Nfld, and men, women and children who have
escaped the horror of war and persecution in Central America, Africa, the
Middle East, the Indian subcontinent and China to seek sanctuary in Canada.
Once in
Canada each arrival claimed to be a refugee with a legitimate fear of
persecution in his or her homeland. In a world in which political torture and
murder is all too common, it became the responsibility of Canadian officials to
determine if each individual claimant was truly a refugee or not. To do this
Canada devised an inland refugee determination process designed to judge each
claim. If determined to be a legitimate refugee, the claimant is granted the
right to stay in Canada as an immigrant. If not, the claimant may be deported.
Late 20th Century
In the
1980s the number of those entering Canada and applying for refugee status grew
steadily and the Canadian determination process was hard-pressed to process
applicants quickly. Nor were refugee claimants universally welcomed by
Canadians. Some Canadians worried that many of the refugee claimants, including
some who successfully made it through the determination process, were not
really legitimate refugees but individuals looking for a way around tough
Canadian immigration regulations.
Some
accused refugees of abusing "the system" and clogging up the
immigration and refugee determination process. Still others argued that by
allowing persons to claim refugee status from within Canada, Canada was denying
itself the opportunity to pick and choose among the pool of refugees abroad and
take only those refugees best suited to Canada. Canada, it was argued, should
select refugees, not allow refugees to select Canada.
The
refugee issue was dramatically brought home to Canadians in the late 1980s,
when 2 ships illegally stranded their respective cargoes of Sikh and Tamil
refugee claimants on Canada's east coast. Amid greatly exaggerated fears that
Canada was about to be flooded with refugees, Parliament and immigration
authorities began tightening up refugee regulations and procedures. The result
has been a continual streamlining or hardening of the Canadian refugee
determination process and a shortening of the time between a refugee claimant's
arrival in Canada and the time the claimant is either granted permission to
stay or is forced to leave. While some Canadians are concerned that these
changes mean that some legitimate refugees are now being denied Canadian
sanctuary, Canadian authorities have been working closely with other countries
and transportation companies to make it more difficult for individuals who
might make a refugee claim to reach Canada. This effort to stop would-be
refugee claimants from getting to Canada is called interdiction.
During
the late 1980s and early 1990s, even as it was seeking to forestall the entry
of would-be refugee claimants, Canada opened new avenues for other immigrants
to enter the country, especially those with employable skills or significant
financial resources. Beginning during the Mulroney Conservative government,
those with capital that they were prepared to invest in Canadian enterprises or
with money and skills necessary to start business which promised to create new
employment and wealth in Canada were invited to apply for Canadian immigration.
Many did.
Through
much of the 1990s the number of entrepreneurial or business immigrants rose
dramatically, eventually reaching 6% of all immigrants entering Canada. Of
these, appreciable numbers of entrepreneurial-class immigrants have come from
Hong Kong, many seeking a safe harbour for themselves, their families and their
assets in advance of the Chinese takeover of Hong Kong in 1997. It was natural
that many should respond to Canada's invitation and the opportunities offered
for capital investment in Canada. As a result, Canada became a prime
destination for Hong Kong and other Chinese immigration and for capital in
flight. Hong Kong and other Chinese immigration has been especially pronounced
in larger urban areas such as Vancouver and Toronto, where the Chinese
community now constitutes the largest immigrant groups. Most of these
entrepreneurial-class immigrants did not arrive speaking English or French, and
this has led to calls for tougher language requirements for those coming to
Canada. An economic slowdown in Asia in the late 1990s reduced the number of
immigrants to Canada and was partly responsible for Canada's failure to reach
its projected annual target for immigration admissions in the past several
years, approximately 220 000 immigrants or 1% of the Canadian population.
In the
quickly changing national and international economic climate of the late 1990s,
Canadian immigration re-emerged as a topic of public debate. And given the
continuing impact of immigration on Canadian society, it is only natural that
there be such a debate. While many economists argue that Canada, with its
relatively low birth rate and greying population, needs the infusion of
population, energy, skills, capital and buying power that immigrants bring to
Canada, other Canadians harbour doubts. Talk of the "new economy,"
with more and more jobs requiring a highly skilled work force, has led some to conclude
that immigrants, or at least the kinds of immigrants that Canada welcomed in
the past, are no longer necessary. Some fear that without a change in immigrant
requirements, immigrants to Canada will not create wealth but take up what few
low-paying jobs are available. In addition, with immigrants of non-European
origin making up a large majority of those entering Canada, some Canadians
express uneasiness at the changing character of urban Canada and the potential
for racial tension.
Public
debate on immigration in Canada has remained civil, and certainly free of the
kind of violence against new arrivals witnessed in France and Germany. Indeed,
on the whole, Canadians generally remain supportive of immigration in spite of
the reservations expressed by some. As part of the larger public debate on
immigration, in the mid-1990s the federal government commissioned a panel to
review Canadian immigration legislation and policy. The panel submitted its
report in 1998. Not all of its recommendations have been accepted, but as
Canada enters a new millennium the government is expected to begin public
consultations on recommendations leading to an overhaul of immigration policy
which, it is hoped, will bring immigration more in line with Canada's changing
economic and social reality.
In
particular, it is expected that Canada will put increased emphasis on
encouraging the arrival of highly educated immigrants who show the kind of
economic flexibility needed to succeed in a constantly changing Canadian job
market. It is also expected that Canada will affirm its commitment to remain a
leader in refugee resettlement, although the country is likely to continue
slowing the arrival of refugee claimants in favour of refugees selection
abroad. But even as Canadians debate the future of immigration, they can take
pride in Canada's long tradition of immigration, the resourcefulness of
immigrants, their readiness to help build Canadian society and the richness of
their cultural contribution to the life of their adopted land.
- Donald H. Avery, Reluctant Host: Canada's Response to Immigrant Workers, 1896-1994 (1995); H. Cowen, British Emigration to British North America (1961); E.C. Guillet, The Great Migration (1963); H. Troper, Only Farmers Need Apply (1972); R. Hurney and Harold Troper, Immigrants: A Portrait of the Urban Experience (1975); Gerald E. Dirks, Canada's Refugee Policy (1977); Reg Whitaker, Double Standard: The Secret History of Canadian Immigration (1987).
Links to other sites
CANADA’S FIRST DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE 1929
Statute of Westminster:
Canada's Declaration of Independence
In the
fall of 1929, Canada's Minister of Justice, Ernest Lapointe, traveled to
England. He took with him Dr. O. D. Skelton, the country's top public servant.
When they were done their negotiations, they had extracted an undertaking from
their British hosts.
In the
fall of 1929, Canada's Minister of Justice, Ernest Lapointe, traveled to
England. He took with him Dr. O. D. Skelton, the country's top public servant.
When they were done their negotiations, they had extracted an undertaking from
their British hosts. Canada would have its independence from the British
Empire.
It was a long time coming.
Confederation in 1867 made Ontario, Quebec, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick into
a single self-governing dominion, but also left Canada as a British colony with
firm ties and obligations to the Mother Country.
O.D. Skelton (standing right) and Prime Minister
William Lyon Mackenzie King, major figures in Statute of Westminster
agreement (photo by Walter J. Turnbull, courtesy Library and Archives Canada
/ PA-200350).
|
Automatically
committed to the First World War in 1914, Canada fought bravely and
brilliantly. Yet everywhere they turned Canadians realized that Britain was in
the way. Theirs was a nation that was not yet a nation.
More freedom
and international recognition were urgently demanded. Prime Minister Robert
Borden's wartime government insisted upon a Canadian signature of the peace
treaty, and a seat in the new League of Nations. Liberal leader W. L. Mackenzie
King, taking power in 1921, signed treaties without a British countersignature
and refused to go along automatically with the empire's foreign and defence
policies.
King
brought Skelton from Queen's University to head the Department of External
Affairs. Taking up the position in 1925, Skelton's mandate was to build an
independent Canadian expertise about world affairs, along with a foreign
service populated by the best and brightest.
Skelton
pushed the King agenda harder than King himself, and he found a powerful ally
in Lapointe, the Prime Minister's Quebec lieutenant and closest political
confidant.
When
Lapointe and Skelton arrived in London in 1929 for the Conference on the
Operation of Dominion Legislation, there was still much to do in the work of
independence. There was a parcel of British laws that applied to Canada and
could not be changed by Canada. And London could still after all these years
override Canadian legislation.
The ODL
Conference, as it quickly came to be called, was convened to examine the
empire's legal structure and make recommendations for improvements. The British
greeted contingents from Canada, South Africa, Australia, New Zealand and the
Irish Free State with sweet promises and dire warnings.
The ODL
opened in the Moses Room at the House of Lords, with its huge mural depicting
the biblical handing down of the Tables of the Law. It was a very impressive
atmosphere to be in for the first five minutes, Skelton wrote to the Prime
Minister, but winter was coming and the heating dated "from the time of
King Alfred, minus the fireplace that is sometimes associated with his
name."
Two
months of difficult discussions ensued, and at different stages right up to the
final day the conference's complete disintegration seemed possible. The British
identified Skelton as the villain-in-chief, but the Canadian's own candidate
for the title was the South African head of delegation, "about the most
obstinate Dutchman in history."
Skelton
had wide latitude for bargaining. The meetings pivoted around him and Sir Maurice
Gwyer, the ablest of the British government's legal minds. They served together
on the conference's key committee, drafted much of the final report, and built
the coalitions that made ultimate consensus possible. Skelton got tough from
time to time, but compromised to make a settlement possible, in part because he
knew that the British were needed to pass the legislation "granting what
we want."
In the
end, the conference recommended the passage of an act by the British Parliament
which would completely eliminate Britain's authority to make laws for Canada
except in certain areas agreed to by both countries, the Canadian constitution
in particular.
The
British tried to resist for a while longer, but the ODL's findings had weight
and momentum and therefore inevitability. Two years later, on December 11,
1931, royal assent was given to the Statute of Westminster, ensuring that
decisions about Canada's future would now be Canada's alone.
The
Statute was enacted in Britain, not Canada. It was a dry, brief lawyer's
document, with no rhetorical flourishes or promises of great things to come.
But it
was Canada's declaration of independence.
http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/statute-of-westminster-canadas-declaration-of-independence-feature/
CANADA: Atlantic Campaign of the War of 1812
The War of 1812 as it
was fought on the high seas included a variety of activities related to sea
power, including clashes between ships, naval blockades, coastal raids, joint
operations with the army and a commerce war involving privateers and letters of
marque.
Atlantic Campaign of the War of 1812
The War of 1812 as it was fought on the high seas included a variety of activities related to sea power, including clashes between ships, naval blockades, coastal raids, joint operations with the army and a commerce war involving privateers and letters of marque.The maritime war was conducted in three phases, each corresponding to a calendar year. In 1812, the advantages lay with the Americans, who won several spectacular single-ship actions. In 1813, the British naval presence in North America increased as additional ships were sent to Halifax and a blockade of the American coast was implemented. By 1814 the Atlantic seaboard was dominated by the Royal Navy and American trade had dwindled to a fraction of pre-war levels.
Naval Power Before the War of 1812
The United States Navy was formed in 1794 and entered the conflict as the best prepared of the two American services. In 1812, the navy had 7200 sailors and marines; its officers were professional and the volunteer seamen were experienced. Many of the men had seen action during the Quasi-War with France (1798-1800) and in the Barbary Wars of North Africa (1801-1805). However, the navy also suffered from inadequate funding and uncertain doctrine in the pre-war years. Dockyard facilities were limited. In 1812, the ocean-going fleet included 13 vessels. Three of them were the "super frigates," and three were regular frigates; the other vessels included five sloops and two brigs. There were also 165 coastal vessels, 62 of which were in commission.The Royal Navy was the most powerful naval force of the time. In 1812, it had 145 000 men and 978 ships, of which about 70% were in commission. Despite the decisive victory at Trafalgar in 1805, France continued to challenge Britain's domination of the seas, which kept the Royal Navy in European waters and prevented it from reinforcing the western Atlantic. The number of French ships-of-the-line increased from 34 in 1807 to 80 by 1813, with another 35 under construction. In contrast, the equivalent vessels in the Royal Navy dropped from 113 in 1807 to 98 in 1813. The world-wide commitments of the Royal Navy also dissipated its strength and expertise, resulting in the navy sending many poorly constructed vessels with ill-trained crews to sea. Given these challenges, the sheer weight of the navy could not be employed against the United States until the war in Europe ended.
The Royal Navy maintained two squadrons in North American waters. The North American Squadron was based at Halifax, while the other squadron was based at Newfoundland. Both were considered backwaters. In 1812, the North American Squadron had 27 ships, including one ship-of-the-line, eight frigates and seven sloops.
Before the declaration of war, the United States deployed its warships in the Atlantic. They were to protect their merchantmen, while attempting to seize British commercial vessels and engage naval ships. Between 1812 and 1815, there were 26 encounters between individual ships or combinations of vessels from both fleets. While much is made of the success of the American super frigates against smaller, less well armed British vessels, the total victories were equally divided between the two navies. British losses represented less than one percent of their fleet, while the American navy lost 20% of their men-of-war.
Naval Blockade
The naval blockade of the United States began informally in 1812 and expanded to cut off more ports as the war progressed. Twenty ships were on station in 1812 and 135 were in place by the end of the conflict. In February 1813, the blockade extended from the Delaware and Chesapeake Bays. New England was originally exempted from the blockade as the British hoped to foment anti-war sentiment in that region, while enjoying merchants' willingness to sell grain and foodstuffs to the British for use by their army in the Iberian Peninsula. In March 1813, the blockade was expanded to include Savannah, Port Royal, Charleston and New York. In-mid November, it was broadened again to include the entire coast south of Narragansett Bay. In May 1814, following the abdication of Napoleon, and the end of the supply problems with Wellington's army, New England was blockaded.The blockade made it difficult for American naval vessels to sortie. The blockade also devastated the American economy. Between 1811 and 1814, the value of exports and imports fell from $114 million to $20 million, while custom rates used to finance the war were more than halved from $13 million to $6 million. Many American merchant vessels did not risk leaving port. British trade on the other hand increased significantly, from £91 million in 1811 to £152 million by 1814.
The Royal Navy also damaged American shipping, commerce and communities by staging raids with marines, colonial marines, regular troops, and foreign troops in British service. Campaigns were undertaken in the Chesapeake Bay between March and September 1813 and April and September 1814. The Admiralty was not altogether certain these attacks aided the war effort and the 1814 attacks were designed to support offensives based from the Canadas. The results of the 1814 coastal attacks were mixed: Washington was occupied and its public buildings destroyed, while an attack on Baltimore failed. The Gulf Coast campaign occurred between May 1814 and February 1815 and included four actions near New Orleans and the capture of Fort Bowyer. Between July 1814 and April 1815, much of the Maine coast was occupied by British forces from Halifax.
Privateering
A final activity undertaken by both Britain and the US during the war also sought to diminish each other's trade through the employment of privateers, which were private vessels that were outfitted with guns and given state sanction to raid and capture the opponent's merchantmen. Initially considered as a dubious, sometimes lawless activity, Privateering emerged from the War of 1812 and Napoleonic Wars as a respectable, legitimate and effective means of maritime defence. This activity was a business venture, in which a successful captain could, following a cruise, sell the vessels he had seized for money, which was then shared by the crew. This was different from the "letter of marque," which allowed merchants to arm their vessels for self defence or to take aggressive action to avoid capture.Privateering was already underway before the War of 1812 began and included a number of participants. British captures were made by the Royal Navy and British, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia privateers. By 1810, the British had taken nearly 1000 American ships, while France had taken 500; another 300 fell to Danish, Neapolitan, Spanish and Dutch flags. Between 1812 and 1815, Britain captured another 500 American vessels. The loss of 2500 vessels over a ten-year period was proportionally more damaging to American trade than the 10 000 British vessels lost over the same period; 2000 of these alone were taken between 1812 and 1815. The Royal Navy recaptured at least 750 prizes, while others were handed back to neutrals or lost at sea.
Compulsory Convoys
One means of reducing losses was the adoption of compulsory convoy, which made it more difficult to locate merchantmen and which also provided protection from escorting warships. By 1808, all shipping leaving Nova Scotia was subject to the Compulsory Convoy Act, which was further improved in 1813.Naval Goals Met
The maritime War of 1812 on the high seas is difficult to isolate from the larger activity of the war in Europe. It was played in a vast theatre and demonstrated the importance of sea power in achieving war aims. Despite several setbacks, the Royal Navy was able to dominate the high seas and had free range over the American coastline through most of the war. Nonetheless, the United States Navy demonstrated that it had a professional officers' corps, excellent sailors, an aggressive doctrine and good ship designs.
And...
HONOUR OUR 1812 HEROES :
NOVA SCOTIA
Unit Lists
PERPETUATION OF WAR OF 1812 UNITS
BY MODERN UNITS OF THE CANADIAN FORCES
Modern Unit
1812 Unit
Governor General's Horse Guards,
Toronto 1st York
(Button's) Troop of Horse
The Ontario Regiment (RCAC),
Oshawa Provincial
Light Dragoons (Fraser's Troop), 1st Leeds, 2nd Grenville, 1st Lennox, 1st
Addington, 1st Prince Edward Troops of Horse
The Queen's York Rangers,
Toronto 1st
York (Button's) Troop of Horse
The Sherbrooke Hussars,
Sherbrooke
Canadian Light Dragoons
12e Régiment Blindée du Canada
(Milice), Three Rivers Quebec Volunteer
Cavalry, Dorchester Provincial Light Dragoons
1st Hussars, London
1st and 2nd Troops, Niagara Light Dragoons
The Royal Canadian Hussars,
Montreal Royal
Montreal Troop of Cavalry
Windsor Regiment (RCAC)
1st Kent and 2nd Essex Troops of Horse
Queen's Own Rifles, Toronto 1st
York Regiment
Les Voltigeurs de Québec,
Québec Voltigeurs Canadiens
Royal Regiment of Canada,
Toronto 1st
York Regiment
Canadian Grenadier Guards,
Montreal 1st
Battalion, Montreal Militia
Royal Hamilton Light Infantry,
Hamilton 2nd
York Regiment
Princess of Wales' Own Regiment,
Kingston 1st Frontenac,
1st Lennox and 1st Addington Regiments
Hastings and Prince Edward
Regiment, Picton 1st
Hastings, 1st Prince Edward,1st Northumberland
and 1st Durham Regiments
Lincoln and Welland Regiment, St
Catharines 1st, 2nd, 3rd,
4th and 5th Regiment of Lincoln
Militia
4th Battalion/ Royal Canadian
Regiment, London 1st
Middlesex Regiment and the Norfolk militia
Highland Fusiliers, Cambridge 1st
Oxford Regiment
Brockville Rifles, Brockville 1st Grenville, 2nd
Grenville, 1st Leeds and 2nd Leeds
Regiments
Stormont, Dundas and Glengarry
Highlanders, Cornwall Glengarry Light
Infantry Fencibles, 1st Glengarry, 2nd Glengarry, 1st Stormont, 1st Prescott
and 1st Dundas Regiments
Fusiliers St. Laurent,
Rimouski
4th Battalion, Select Embodied Militia
Régiment de la Chaudière,
Lévis
6th Battalion, Select Embodied Militia
4e Bataillon, Royal 22e Régiment,
Montreal 2nd
Battalion, Montreal Militia
6e
Bataillon, Royal 22e Régiment, Drummondville Frontier Light Infantry
Fusiliers Mont-Royal, Montreal 3rd
Battalion, Montreal Militia
Royal New Brunswick Regiment,
Fredericton 104th
Regiment of Foot, New Brunswick Fencibles
Le Régiment de Maisonneuve,
Montreal 1st
Battalion, Select Embodied Militia
Essex and Kent Scottish,
Windsor 1st Essex, 2nd Essex and
1st Kent Regiments
48th Highlanders, Toronto
3rd York Regiment
Régiment du Saguenay,
Jonquière
6th Battalion, Select Embodied Militia
Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders,
Hamilton 2nd York
Regiment
Lake Superior Scottish, Thunder
Bay Michigan
Fencibles, Mississippi Volunteers, Mississippi Volunteer Artillery, Dease's
Mississippi Volunteers, Canadian Volunteers
Fusiliers de Sherbrooke,
Sherbrooke
2nd Battalion, Select Embodied Militia
Royal Montreal Regiment,
Montreal
5th Battalion, Select Embodied Militia
Toronto Scottish, Toronto
3rd York Regiment
Royal Newfoundland Regiment, St.
John Royal
Newfoundland Fencibles
General Perpetuations
All infantry regiments in Nova
Scotia Nova Scotia Fencibles
All infantry regiments in
Quebec
Canadian Fencibles
Voltigeurs Canadien
All infantry regiments in southern
Ontario
Incorporated Militia of Upper Canada
Naval Reserve Units in Ontario
Provincial Marine
Summary
Honour our 1812 Heroes is a group
of concerned Canadians dedicated to:
a)
secure official recognition of the Canadian military units that fought
in the War of 1812; and
b) perpetuate that recognition through the
award of Battle Honours to units of the Canadian Forces.
Our aim is to accomplish these
objectives by June 18, 2012, the commencement of the bicentennial commemoration
of the War of 1812. Unlike the United Kingdom and the United States, Canada has
never officially recognized our 1812 military heritage in this way. Achieving our two goals will redress this longstanding neglect and create a
lasting legacy that will make future Canadians proud of their forbearers.
Quick Facts
· The year 2012 marks the bicentenary of the
War of 1812, a seminal event in Canadian history
· In this conflict English and French
Canadian militia regiments fought with valour to repel a foreign invader, and
suffered hundreds of casualties
· By the end of the war, 7,000 Canadian
regulars were on active service and another 89,000 militiamen were available if
required (equal to 16% of the
population)
· Sir George Prevost, the Governor and
Commander-in-Chief of British North America praised the militia and recommended
they receive Battle Honours
· The British Army was awarded 5 Battle
Honours for the War of 1812 –Detroit, Queenston, Miami, Niagara and Bladensburg, but none was
granted to the Canadian militia
· The Department of National Defence (DND)
refuses to authorize the award of Battle Honours for the War of 1812. An arbitrary decision by DND a century ago
refuses to recognize the Canadian military prior to 1855.
· DND policy refuses to recognize the
perpetuation of current Canadian Forces units to War of 1812 units and refuses
to award Battle Honours to those units, also stating that these awards cannot
be retro-actively awarded. Yet official
DND publications state that the 1812 battalions “can be considered as the
forerunners of the regiments today “
(Title CFP 267) and the awarding of Battle Honours for the War of 1812
would fulfill most principles outlined in DND policy (Title CFP 200)
·
Many precedents already exist for the retro-active awarding of Battle
Honours.
· Despite Prime Minister Harper’s direction
to DND to “Recognize the War of 1812 heritage embraced by some units”, this
recognition has not happened.
In our research section there is a
more comprehensive document which goes into great detail all the points made
above. This document begins with a
selection of relevant quotes concerning the importance of the forthcoming
bicentenary of the War of 1812. It continues with a discussion of the
achievements of Canadian soldiers during that conflict and how those
achievements have been deliberately slighted by the British and Canadian
governments. It concludes with a plan to redress this neglect as we approach
the celebration of a major milestone in the history of Canada.
-----------------------
Canada- USA and Great Britain
Boileau, John. Half-Hearted
Enemies: Nova Scotia, New England and the War of 1812. Halifax: Formac
Publishing Company, 2005. 176 pages, illustrated, bibliography, index. ISBN#
0887806570. Softcover. C$19.95 (Canadian).
The War of 1812 is a fascinating
conflict. Fought between June 1812 and the spring of 1815, it was the last war
between the United States and Great Britain. The 1814 Treaty of Ghent resolved
none of its causes, leading many to believe that the "Second American
War" (the first being the American War of Independence) would be followed
by a third and a massive fortifications project was undertaken in Canada in
anticipation of that event. The War of 1812 was not limited to a series of
skirmishes along the frontier of the interior, but included operations from the
area of modern Sault Ste. Marie to the eastern seaboard of the United States
from Maine to the Gulf of Mexico. Naval engagements occurred on the Great
Lakes, the Upper St. Lawrence River, Lake Champlain, the Atlantic and Pacific
Oceans and the Caribbean Sea. It was a significant and complex war that is
often lost in the shadow of the struggle against Napoleon, but it is witnessing
increased popular and academic interest.
Half-Hearted Enemies focuses on an
important, albeit secondary theatre of war, promising to examine Nova Scotia
and its "ambiguous wartime" relationship with the New England states.
It promises, at least according to the jacket notes, a "new perspective on
a key period." Unfortunately, it never really gets there and treads into
waters that have limited relation to the overall topic. The book is in effect,
a series of essays rather than an overview of a region during wartime.
John Boileau retired as a colonel,
having served throughout Canada, the United States, West Germany (as it was
then called), Cyprus and Great Britain. He commanded Lord Strathcona's Horse
(Royal Canadians in the late 1980s, and this reviewer's first commanding
officer) and later served with the Canadian Defence Liaison Staff (London). An
avid history buff, Boileau has, since retirement taken to writing, producing a
history of Canadian hydrofoils, several articles and served as consulting
editor for A Century of Service: Canada's Armed Forces from the Boer War to
East Timor, by Jim Lotz. This is his first book on the War of 1812.
In 1812, Nova Scotia was a separate
colony within British North America that with Cape Breton, New Brunswick and
Prince Edward Island, formed Atlantic Command, under the command of
Lieutenant-General Sir John Coape Sherbrooke. Halifax was home of the North
American Squadron of the Royal Navy. Considered largely a backwater before the
war, the North American squadron rapidly grew in strength and prominence and
established the blockade of the American coast in 1812. The British Castine
Expedition, which culminated in the occupation of a portion of Maine, was
launched from Halifax, while the remains of Major-General Robert Ross, who led
British troops into Washington and who was killed in September 1814, rest
there. Nova Scotia was also base for a large privateer fleet that on the one
hand, which seriously damaged the American economy, while continuing trade and
smuggling with the United States. Indeed, despite the state of war, the
frontier, like that on the Upper St. Lawrence, remained open to social and
economic "intercourse" (using the terminology of the time) that was
only interrupted when a local commander actively sought to end it. Lieutenant
John Coteur, later of the 104th Foot, observed this first hand noting,
"how uncomfortably like civil war it seemed."[1] One might indeed
think the local populations did not fully support the war, hence the title.
The chapters examine five
single-ship engagements fought in the Atlantic, the privateer war, American
prisoners held on Prison Island near Halifax, the burning of Washington and the
fate of Black refugees. These military, economic and social themes could have
supported the thesis but lose focus in their presentation. For example, an
entire chapter is devoted to British operations in the Chesapeake, the
occupation and burning of Washington and the battle of Baltimore. Why cover
this in such detail? Simply to highlight that the remains of the British land
force commander, General Ross, rest in Halifax? He and his brigade came from
Europe, while the naval vessels were from the Inshore Squadron, based in
Bermuda. Its' commander, Rear Admiral George Cockburn suggested Ross make a
dash for Washington and then enthusiastically pushed for the city to be
torched, but what is the relevance of this to the relations between Nova Scotia
and New England? Certainly, Vice Admiral Alexander Cochrane, commanding at
Halifax, had his hand in the devastating raids conducted along the American
coast, but this becomes lost by focusing on movements and tactics? Why not
discuss the raids Cochrane ordered on New England that were supported by the
provinces' governor, Lieutenant-General Sherbrooke? Nothing is said of
Cochrane's cancellation of the licences that had made possible a lucrative
coastal trade between New England, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick.
This problem continues with the
discussion of the high seas war. Following an overview of naval events from
1793 to 1812, the focus remains on the action, noting American naval strength
lay in "the three 44 gun super-frigates … as strong as British ships of
the line and faster than any British 38 gun vessel, that seriously challenged
the Royal Navy" (p. 30). American
frigates proved more heavily gunned than their nominal rating would suggest,
but the lesson of the naval war on the high seas, and the effect on the region
in particular, is missed. The Americans achieved several spectacular
single-ship victories, but the British later gave as good as they got. Although
the Royal Navy and the United States Navy had some 26 encounters on the high
seas, they proved a draw. The spectacular events surrounding these duels are
overshadowed the fact that the frigate war had little strategic importance. The
real American success, at least according to Mahan, lay in the Americans
forcing the Halifax squadron to concentrate, thus delaying the implementation
of the blockade of the American coast in the early months of the war. The
weakness of the blockade continued through 1812 and into 1813, with, one might
assume implications on Nova Scotia - New England relations. But this is not
discussed.
While these criticisms may not be
appropriate for what is purportedly a popular history, they demonstrate the
difficulties and dangers of this genre. Historians are often criticized for
dry, academic prose and for repeating one another. While certain historians
have a knack for turning a phrase that is so good that it must be quoted, over
time their work can become less reliable or even dated. This is not their
fault, just the reality that historical knowledge advances and as more sources
are studied or reexamined in an effort to confirm earlier conclusions.
Secondary sources are therefore a reflection of the state of the literature at
a particular time and relying on them, without a solid understanding of the
literature can be dangerous. Furthermore, while popular authors may be able to
craft a readable, even exciting tale, they often achieve this by ensuring the
facts do not get in the way of a good story. Having said that, there are
popular authors who are capable of writing superb pieces of work.
While it is evident that Boileau
made a careful read of his sources, Half-Hearted Enemies does not present the
story of Nova Scotia and New England during the War of 1812. Rather it presents
a series of vignettes dealing with various aspect of the war. The merit of the
book lays with the examination of the prison on Melville Island and the fate of
Black refugees that arrived in Nova Scotia. There is little said about New
England or the manifestation of opposition to the war, while the Hartford
Convention, which threatened secession of the New England states, is not even
mentioned. The result is six chapters that give glimpses of the War of 1812
from the perspective of Nova Scotia and does not, as the publisher states on
the jacket notes, of offer "a new perspective on a key period in Canadian
British and U.S. history."
Reviewed by Major John R.
Grodzinski, CD
-------------
It's about time Canada and
Canadians learned about Canada's history..... seriously......used to have 7
libaries in our old house.... and all of it was Canadian..... and National Geographic;
of course, and Maclean's etc...
Damn Yankees are trying to steal
our victory in 1812
As plans are made to commemorate
the War of 1812, the U.S. tries to re-write the ending
by Peter Shawn Taylor on Tuesday,
October 11, 2011 11:00am - 73 Comments
Fanshawe Pioneer Village, London,
Ont. (Colin O'Connor/Maclean's)
Meet Col. Joel Stone, Canada's
newest hero of the War of 1812.
Born in Connecticut in 1749, Stone
moved to Upper Canada during the tumult of the American Revolution and settled
at Gananoque, in eastern Ontario along the St. Lawrence River, where he opened
a sawmill and got himself appointed to a variety of government posts, including
commander of the local militia. But his quiet life as a gentleman settler ended
when the United States declared war in June 1812. Suddenly Col. Stone and his
small community found themselves in the midst of the fight for Canada.
The St. Lawrence was the British
army's sole supply route to Upper Canada and the Great Lakes. If the American
military cut river access, the whole province, from Kingston to what is now
Windsor, would inevitably fall to the invaders. If Canada was to exist as an
independent country, Col. Stone and the Gananoque militia had to keep their
part of this vital supply route open.
A challenge wasn't long in coming.
On Sept. 21, 1812, in one of the first engagements of the war, a raiding party
led by Capt. Benjamin Forsyth, and comprising 100 skilled riflemen from North
Carolina and Virginia, attacked Gananoque in a night raid. Their aim: create
havoc, control the river and starve the British army.
"Colonel Joel Stone,
commanding the Gananoque militia, successfully defended Gananoque during the
first raid into Canada by American troops from Sackets Harbor during the War of
1812," reads a recent release from the federal government, recollecting
the efforts of Col. Stone and his men that night long ago. To commemorate this
important but little-known battle, Ottawa is paying half of the $600,000 cost
to build the Joel Stone Heritage Park-a tribute to "the founder of
Gananoque and a local hero of the War of 1812."
With the bicentennial of the war
fast approaching, Canadians can expect to hear a lot more about Col. Stone and
many other familiar and unfamiliar names from the conflict. It's often said
that Canada suffers from an excess of geography and a deficit of history, and
so the anniversary is a rare and welcome opportunity for the entire country to
celebrate a time of daunting heroes, dangerous invaders, grave perils and
miraculous triumphs. Over the next three years, Ottawa is undertaking a massive
campaign to remind everyone of the drama and importance of these 200-year-old
stories. Expect plenty of period-dress re-enactments, well-publicized
investments in existing historical sites, a new national war memorial at
Parliament Hill and plenty of money for smaller local commemorations, like Col.
Stone's park.
The defence of Canada between 1812
and 1814 should be seen as a foundational moment for modern Canada. What was a
disparate group of recent immigrants spread across a broad and lonely frontier
became, once the war was over, a burgeoning nation with a distinct Canadian
identity. The War of 1812 is as significant to the birth of Canada as
Confederation. And considerably more action-packed.
Yet if war is the continuance of
politics by other means, the War of 1812 may well prove the opposite is true as
well. Canada is not the only former combatant gearing up for the bicentennial.
Our former adversaries, those rebellious and aggressive Americans, are planning
their own commemorations, and with a different take on the war. They think they
won.
If Canada intends to claim victory
in the War of 1812 we're going to have to fight for it. All over again.
Often called the "forgotten
war" by historians, the War of 1812 has, until now, occupied a rather
small corner of the Canadian collective consciousness. Sir Isaac Brock and
Laura Secord are well-known names, but largely because they've been
appropriated for other purposes-a university and candy company. Keen history
buffs may recall a few notable addresses, such as Queenston Heights, Crysler's
Farm or Lundy's Lane, but these glimmers of recognition typically pale in
comparison to the mighty nation-building narratives built around Confederation,
the construction of the CPR or Vimy Ridge.
By the time James Moore, the
federal heritage minister, is finished, however, he expects all Canadians to
understand the war's importance. "Canadian identity was largely shaped by
the War of 1812," says Moore. "It was a fight for Canada and the
beginning of our independence."
Unusual for an historical event,
the War of 1812 found itself a key plank in the federal Conservatives' recent
election platform, which promised a new national memorial in Ottawa, proper
interment for soldiers' remains from the battle of Stoney Creek, belated
recognition of many Canadian militia units from the war and "hundreds of
events and re-enactments across the country." Later this month, Moore will
unveil a new federal secretariat to oversee an $11.5-million War of 1812
commemoration fund.
"This war leads directly to
Confederation in 1867," Moore explains, ascribing the most basic
characteristics of Canada-a constitutional monarchy, the preservation of a
French-speaking Quebec, an accommodating native policy and our healthy economic
and political relationship with the Americans-to the successful defence of
Canada's borders. "We were invaded and we repulsed that invasion. Because
of the War of 1812 we grew up to be uniquely Canadian."
Putting the heroes and storylines
of the War of 1812 up on a national stage scratches a great many Conservative
itches as well. It plays up the resurrected importance of the military in
everyday Canadian life, emphasizes our ties to the British Crown and, according
to Moore, strikes a blow against efforts of previous Liberal governments to
define Canada as a series of modern Liberal accomplishments such as medicare
and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. "There is this leftist mythology
that Canadian history began with the election of Pierre Trudeau and was
solidified in 1982 with the signing of the Charter," he gripes.
"That's utterly irresponsible. There is a Canadian identity that goes back
much farther and we should be very proud of it."
The War of 1812 had its origins in
a maritime conflict between America and Britain. The British practice of
intercepting American shipping to enforce a blockade against Napoleon
Bonaparte's Europe irked American pride and pushed Congress to declare war in
June 1812. Britain was keen to avoid such a war, however, and immediately
offered to rescind the practice. No matter, U.S. president James Madison
authorized multiple invasions of Canada as the means to punish Britain. The
main battle zone was to be Ontario, then called Upper Canada.
At the time war was declared, a
majority of the 75,000 inhabitants in Upper Canada were recent American
immigrants, lured across the border by cheap land and low taxes. Expecting to
be greeted as compatriots and liberators, most Americans figured the conquest
of Canada would be, to use former president Thomas Jefferson's memorable
phrase, "a mere matter of marching."
Getting in the way of this walking
holiday was the charismatic and energetic Gen. Brock. Facing invasion by a
nation of 7.5 million, Brock had just 1,200 British troops and whatever help he
could muster from natives and Canadian settlers to defend Upper Canada.
Despite these odds, Brock pulled
off three stunning victories within the first few months of the war. He ordered
the capture of the U.S. army outpost Fort Mackinac, at the strategic junction
of Lake Huron and Lake Michigan, before that garrison even knew war had been
declared. Then he stunned the continent by bluffing a nervous U.S. Gen. William
Hull into surrendering his entire army at Detroit without firing a shot. Two
months later he died on the battlefield at Queenston Heights, near Niagara
Falls, in the process of repelling another American force. Brock's boldness
embarrassed the Americans, encouraged Britain's native allies to join the fight
and rallied the population to the Union Jack.
The final two years of war proved
much less invigorating, perhaps because Brock was no longer around. Each side
traded victories and defeats in what became an increasingly bitter struggle.
American forces burned Toronto, then called York, as well as
Niagara-on-the-Lake. The British torched Buffalo, N.Y., and Washington,
pillaged the width and breadth of Chesapeake Bay, and blockaded most of the
eastern seaboard.
Significantly, though, every attempted
incursion into Canada along the crucial St. Lawrence valley was turned aside,
as much due to incompetent U.S. leadership and indifferent troops as to
Canadian military prowess. Still, in 1813 a small force of Canadian-born
soldiers under the command of Quebecer Charles de Salaberry defeated a far
larger American army at Châteauguay, Que. This has become a signature moment in
Canadian military mythology; Moore describes it as his favourite moment of the
war.
By 1814, both sides were eager for
peace. And yet the Treaty of Ghent, crafted on Christmas Eve 1814, was a
curious agreement. All borders were left as they were prior to the war. And the
original reason for the conflict, maritime law, wasn't mentioned. It was as if
the war never happened. To underline the oddity of it all, the biggest and
bloodiest battle of the war, the Battle of New Orleans, occurred after the
peace treaty had been signed.
This absence of a conclusive end to
the war had its advantages for Canada. If Britain had kept northern Maine or
the other bits of American territory it had captured by 1814, festering
American resentment could have easily led to another war. Alternatively, if the
War of 1812 had never happened, it's possible Canada might have been overrun by
American settlers in the same manner the U.S. grabbed California from Mexico.
As it was, the war solidified the existing border, Canadians began to think of
themselves as different from their neighbours, and the two countries learned to
get along. "Only once the war was over did the settlers really start to
consider themselves as Canadian," remarks Alan Taylor, author of the
recent political history of the conflict The Civil War of 1812.
This lack of a declared winner,
however, has allowed the former combatants considerable licence in interpreting
the war however they wish. History has always been subject to lively revision
and prejudice, but the War of 1812 seems extraordinary in its diversity of
interpretations.
Canadians, with the assistance of
Ottawa, quite rightly tell themselves a story of how a few plucky British and
Canadian soldiers fought off a massive American invasion and created for
themselves a nation. It's David versus Goliath in the woods of Ontario and
Quebec.
That's not a story likely to stir
much interest south of the border. As aggressors who failed repeatedly in their
attempts to conquer Canada, the war has always presented a dilemma for
practised American mythmakers. "The land war has never played well in the
U.S.," observes Taylor. "So it has been shunted to the side and
ignored. For Americans, the 'real war' was fought on the high seas."
In declaring war on Britain, the
U.S. put its six frigates up against the mighty 1,000-ship Royal Navy. And in
the first few months of the war, this handful of ships scored several
surprising one-on-one victories over British frigates. While these victories
mattered little from a strategic point of view, they provided a competing David
versus Goliath tale that has since allowed the U.S. to remember the entire
conflict as a victory.
Stephen Budiansky is the author of
last year's Perilous Fight: America's Intrepid War with Britain on the High
Seas, 1812-1815, and typical of a long line of American writers who have picked
up on this naval underdog narrative. The U.S. navy was the "unambiguous
victor of the war," Budiansky writes. He further claims the Americans
achieved everything they wanted in the war, evidence of the peace treaty be
damned. "We stood up to the mightiest sea power on earth. And after it was
over, the British never again tried to mess with American ships," he says
in an interview. He then makes a rather bizarre analogy between the Vietnam War
and the War of 1812, in which the Americans play the role of the Viet Cong.
Whatever it takes to create a winner.
Of course, as Taylor notes, turning
the War of 1812 into an American victory at sea requires ignoring everything
that happened along the Canadian border. The origins of this national amnesia
can be traced back to Theodore Roosevelt. Before he became president in 1901,
Roosevelt wrote a celebrated history of the war that focused exclusively on
those few American naval victories. Discussing the legendary Canadian defence
at Châteauguay, for example, Roosevelt sniffed that "This affair . . . has
been, absurdly enough, designated a 'battle' by most British and Canadian
historians." Rather, he explained, it barely rated a "small
skirmish." Defeat at Châteauguay? Never happened!
"The Americans have been
getting away with this nonsense for two centuries," grouses Canadian
historian Donald Graves, one of Canada's most prolific writers on the War of
1812. "In their version of the war, the fact that they got defeated
doesn't even rate a mention."
This imperative to turn the War of
1812 into a victory for American audiences has carried through to upcoming
bicentennial commemorations as well. Maryland has seized on the War of 1812 as
a way to sell itself to tourists as the birthplace of the national anthem.
Shortly after burning Washington, a British force attempted to take Baltimore,
too. But after bombarding a nearby fort with a spectacular, but entirely
ineffective, rocket attack, the British gave up. It was during this attack that
poet Francis Scott Key wrote the words to the Star-Spangled Banner. A new
Maryland promotional video claims this is the moment that "helps America
win the war."
That claim proves something of an
awkward moment for Bill Pencek, executive director of the Maryland War of 1812
Bicentennial Commission. "Did the U.S. really win the war? Not really,"
he admits when pressed. "It was more of a draw." Nonetheless, money
must be raised and tourists attracted. And no one wants to celebrate a loser.
The same goes at New Orleans, where
the 1815 battle is remembered today by the U.S. National Parks Service as proof
of "American democracy triumphing over the old European ideas of
aristocracy and entitlement."
And as might be expected, the U.S.
Navy is also planning a big splash with the War of 1812, on par with its
efforts in 1976 recognizing the American bicentennial. "Two hundred years
ago we fought for free trade and sailors' rights," says Capt. Patrick
Burns, director of the Office of Navy Commemorations. "And we are still
doing that today." Capt. Burns emphasizes that both the Canadian and
British navies are getting friendly invitations to attend the American
ceremonies, although he adds with obvious enthusiasm: "That a six-frigate
navy could take on the world's largest superpower at the time is just
amazing."
Donald Hickey of Wayne State
College in Nebraska is one of the few American historians to call the war a
loss for the U.S. Nonetheless, he considers the conflict to be an opiate of
history. "Everybody's happy with the outcome of the War of 1812,"
Hickey notes wryly. "Americans are happy because they think they won.
Canadians are happier because they know they won. And the British are happiest
of all because they've forgotten all about it."
In fact, British historians have
recently risen to defend their national honour. In How Britain Won the War of
1812, author Brian Arthur argues that the British naval blockade strangled the
American economy (no pennies were minted in 1815 because the country had ran
out of copper) and forced Washington to sue for peace. "Britain won the
war because the Americans simply ran out of money," he says. Of course
this version also ignores the Canadian land war.
Against these entrenched positions,
Canada does have one advantage. Of the three former combatant nations, only
Canada's federal government is investing heavily to commemorate the war.
Maryland is rare among states in giving it major play. Many historic sites in
the former battle zones of New York and Michigan are facing budget cuts and
layoffs due to financial stresses. And despite the efforts of the U.S. Navy, there
is no U.S. federal office to recognize the war as there is in Canada. This
gives us a rare opportunity to finally out-point our neighbours on North
American history. "You already won the war once," quips Hickey.
"Now you get to win it all over again."
Not that the Canadian government
intends to rub it in. While promising to "make the most of this moment in
Canadian history," Heritage Minister Moore promises to avoid gloating for
fear of antagonizing our sensitive southern neighbours. "This is not a competition,"
he says of the upcoming commemorations. "One of the great outcomes of the
war is the very healthy relationship we've had with the U.S. ever since it
ended." Indeed, every press release from Ottawa regarding the War of 1812
includes at least one boilerplate reference "celebrating two centuries of
peaceful coexistence with the United States."
Then again, if the Americans insist
on imaginatively claiming they won the war, Canadians aren't above a little
creative mythologizing of our own. Consider once more Col. Stone, recently
honoured with a park by the federal government for "successfully
defending" Gananoque from attack early in the war. The fact is, that's not
exactly what happened on Sept. 21, 1812.
When American invaders waded ashore
that night, Col. Stone was nowhere to be found. His leaderless militia fired
one volley at the American raiders and then scampered into the woods, after
which Capt. Forsyth's men set fire to the government storehouse, shot up Col.
Stone's house (wounding Mrs. Stone, who was at home) and absconded with all the
loot they could carry-30 barrels of flour, 12 prisoners, 41 muskets and a large
supply of Stone's personal belongings. "They plundered the place pretty
thoroughly," notes historian Taylor.
For the rest of the war, however,
Col. Stone and his militia did keep the vital St. Lawrence supply route open
for the most part. If his decidedly unsuccessful defence of Gananoque on Sept.
21, 1812 is remembered today by Ottawa as a triumph worth celebrating, it must
be because history is written by the victors.
------
It's about time Canada and
Canadians learned about Canada's history..... seriously......used to have 7
libaries in our old house.... and all of it was Canadian..... and National
Geographic; of course, and Maclean's etc...
Damn Yankees are trying to steal
our victory in 1812
As plans are made to commemorate
the War of 1812, the U.S. tries to re-write the ending
by Peter Shawn Taylor on Tuesday,
October 11, 2011 11:00am - 73 Comments
Fanshawe Pioneer Village, London,
Ont. (Colin O'Connor/Maclean's)
Meet Col. Joel Stone, Canada's
newest hero of the War of 1812.
Born in Connecticut in 1749, Stone
moved to Upper Canada during the tumult of the American Revolution and settled
at Gananoque, in eastern Ontario along the St. Lawrence River, where he opened
a sawmill and got himself appointed to a variety of government posts, including
commander of the local militia. But his quiet life as a gentleman settler ended
when the United States declared war in June 1812. Suddenly Col. Stone and his
small community found themselves in the midst of the fight for Canada.
The St. Lawrence was the British
army's sole supply route to Upper Canada and the Great Lakes. If the American
military cut river access, the whole province, from Kingston to what is now
Windsor, would inevitably fall to the invaders. If Canada was to exist as an
independent country, Col. Stone and the Gananoque militia had to keep their
part of this vital supply route open.
A challenge wasn't long in coming.
On Sept. 21, 1812, in one of the first engagements of the war, a raiding party
led by Capt. Benjamin Forsyth, and comprising 100 skilled riflemen from North
Carolina and Virginia, attacked Gananoque in a night raid. Their aim: create
havoc, control the river and starve the British army.
"Colonel Joel Stone,
commanding the Gananoque militia, successfully defended Gananoque during the
first raid into Canada by American troops from Sackets Harbor during the War of
1812," reads a recent release from the federal government, recollecting
the efforts of Col. Stone and his men that night long ago. To commemorate this
important but little-known battle, Ottawa is paying half of the $600,000 cost
to build the Joel Stone Heritage Park-a tribute to "the founder of
Gananoque and a local hero of the War of 1812."
With the bicentennial of the war
fast approaching, Canadians can expect to hear a lot more about Col. Stone and
many other familiar and unfamiliar names from the conflict. It's often said
that Canada suffers from an excess of geography and a deficit of history, and
so the anniversary is a rare and welcome opportunity for the entire country to
celebrate a time of daunting heroes, dangerous invaders, grave perils and
miraculous triumphs. Over the next three years, Ottawa is undertaking a massive
campaign to remind everyone of the drama and importance of these 200-year-old
stories. Expect plenty of period-dress re-enactments, well-publicized
investments in existing historical sites, a new national war memorial at
Parliament Hill and plenty of money for smaller local commemorations, like Col.
Stone's park.
The defence of Canada between 1812
and 1814 should be seen as a foundational moment for modern Canada. What was a
disparate group of recent immigrants spread across a broad and lonely frontier
became, once the war was over, a burgeoning nation with a distinct Canadian
identity. The War of 1812 is as significant to the birth of Canada as
Confederation. And considerably more action-packed.
Yet if war is the continuance of
politics by other means, the War of 1812 may well prove the opposite is true as
well. Canada is not the only former combatant gearing up for the bicentennial.
Our former adversaries, those rebellious and aggressive Americans, are planning
their own commemorations, and with a different take on the war. They think they
won.
If Canada intends to claim victory
in the War of 1812 we're going to have to fight for it. All over again.
Often called the "forgotten
war" by historians, the War of 1812 has, until now, occupied a rather
small corner of the Canadian collective consciousness. Sir Isaac Brock and
Laura Secord are well-known names, but largely because they've been
appropriated for other purposes-a university and candy company. Keen history buffs
may recall a few notable addresses, such as Queenston Heights, Crysler's Farm
or Lundy's Lane, but these glimmers of recognition typically pale in comparison
to the mighty nation-building narratives built around Confederation, the
construction of the CPR or Vimy Ridge.
By the time James Moore, the
federal heritage minister, is finished, however, he expects all Canadians to
understand the war's importance. "Canadian identity was largely shaped by
the War of 1812," says Moore. "It was a fight for Canada and the
beginning of our independence."
Unusual for an historical event,
the War of 1812 found itself a key plank in the federal Conservatives' recent
election platform, which promised a new national memorial in Ottawa, proper
interment for soldiers' remains from the battle of Stoney Creek, belated
recognition of many Canadian militia units from the war and "hundreds of
events and re-enactments across the country." Later this month, Moore will
unveil a new federal secretariat to oversee an $11.5-million War of 1812
commemoration fund.
"This war leads directly to
Confederation in 1867," Moore explains, ascribing the most basic
characteristics of Canada-a constitutional monarchy, the preservation of a
French-speaking Quebec, an accommodating native policy and our healthy economic
and political relationship with the Americans-to the successful defence of
Canada's borders. "We were invaded and we repulsed that invasion. Because
of the War of 1812 we grew up to be uniquely Canadian."
Putting the heroes and storylines
of the War of 1812 up on a national stage scratches a great many Conservative
itches as well. It plays up the resurrected importance of the military in
everyday Canadian life, emphasizes our ties to the British Crown and, according
to Moore, strikes a blow against efforts of previous Liberal governments to
define Canada as a series of modern Liberal accomplishments such as medicare
and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. "There is this leftist mythology
that Canadian history began with the election of Pierre Trudeau and was
solidified in 1982 with the signing of the Charter," he gripes.
"That's utterly irresponsible. There is a Canadian identity that goes back
much farther and we should be very proud of it."
The War of 1812 had its origins in
a maritime conflict between America and Britain. The British practice of
intercepting American shipping to enforce a blockade against Napoleon
Bonaparte's Europe irked American pride and pushed Congress to declare war in
June 1812. Britain was keen to avoid such a war, however, and immediately
offered to rescind the practice. No matter, U.S. president James Madison
authorized multiple invasions of Canada as the means to punish Britain. The
main battle zone was to be Ontario, then called Upper Canada.
At the time war was declared, a
majority of the 75,000 inhabitants in Upper Canada were recent American
immigrants, lured across the border by cheap land and low taxes. Expecting to
be greeted as compatriots and liberators, most Americans figured the conquest
of Canada would be, to use former president Thomas Jefferson's memorable
phrase, "a mere matter of marching."
Getting in the way of this walking
holiday was the charismatic and energetic Gen. Brock. Facing invasion by a
nation of 7.5 million, Brock had just 1,200 British troops and whatever help he
could muster from natives and Canadian settlers to defend Upper Canada.
Despite these odds, Brock pulled
off three stunning victories within the first few months of the war. He ordered
the capture of the U.S. army outpost Fort Mackinac, at the strategic junction
of Lake Huron and Lake Michigan, before that garrison even knew war had been
declared. Then he stunned the continent by bluffing a nervous U.S. Gen. William
Hull into surrendering his entire army at Detroit without firing a shot. Two
months later he died on the battlefield at Queenston Heights, near Niagara
Falls, in the process of repelling another American force. Brock's boldness
embarrassed the Americans, encouraged Britain's native allies to join the fight
and rallied the population to the Union Jack.
The final two years of war proved
much less invigorating, perhaps because Brock was no longer around. Each side
traded victories and defeats in what became an increasingly bitter struggle.
American forces burned Toronto, then called York, as well as
Niagara-on-the-Lake. The British torched Buffalo, N.Y., and Washington,
pillaged the width and breadth of Chesapeake Bay, and blockaded most of the
eastern seaboard.
Significantly, though, every
attempted incursion into Canada along the crucial St. Lawrence valley was
turned aside, as much due to incompetent U.S. leadership and indifferent troops
as to Canadian military prowess. Still, in 1813 a small force of Canadian-born
soldiers under the command of Quebecer Charles de Salaberry defeated a far
larger American army at Châteauguay, Que. This has become a signature moment in
Canadian military mythology; Moore describes it as his favourite moment of the
war.
By 1814, both sides were eager for
peace. And yet the Treaty of Ghent, crafted on Christmas Eve 1814, was a
curious agreement. All borders were left as they were prior to the war. And the
original reason for the conflict, maritime law, wasn't mentioned. It was as if
the war never happened. To underline the oddity of it all, the biggest and
bloodiest battle of the war, the Battle of New Orleans, occurred after the
peace treaty had been signed.
This absence of a conclusive end to
the war had its advantages for Canada. If Britain had kept northern Maine or
the other bits of American territory it had captured by 1814, festering
American resentment could have easily led to another war. Alternatively, if the
War of 1812 had never happened, it's possible Canada might have been overrun by
American settlers in the same manner the U.S. grabbed California from Mexico.
As it was, the war solidified the existing border, Canadians began to think of
themselves as different from their neighbours, and the two countries learned to
get along. "Only once the war was over did the settlers really start to
consider themselves as Canadian," remarks Alan Taylor, author of the
recent political history of the conflict The Civil War of 1812.
This lack of a declared winner,
however, has allowed the former combatants considerable licence in interpreting
the war however they wish. History has always been subject to lively revision
and prejudice, but the War of 1812 seems extraordinary in its diversity of
interpretations.
Canadians, with the assistance of
Ottawa, quite rightly tell themselves a story of how a few plucky British and
Canadian soldiers fought off a massive American invasion and created for
themselves a nation. It's David versus Goliath in the woods of Ontario and
Quebec.
That's not a story likely to stir
much interest south of the border. As aggressors who failed repeatedly in their
attempts to conquer Canada, the war has always presented a dilemma for
practised American mythmakers. "The land war has never played well in the
U.S.," observes Taylor. "So it has been shunted to the side and
ignored. For Americans, the 'real war' was fought on the high seas."
In declaring war on Britain, the
U.S. put its six frigates up against the mighty 1,000-ship Royal Navy. And in
the first few months of the war, this handful of ships scored several surprising
one-on-one victories over British frigates. While these victories mattered
little from a strategic point of view, they provided a competing David versus
Goliath tale that has since allowed the U.S. to remember the entire conflict as
a victory.
Stephen Budiansky is the author of
last year's Perilous Fight: America's Intrepid War with Britain on the High
Seas, 1812-1815, and typical of a long line of American writers who have picked
up on this naval underdog narrative. The U.S. navy was the "unambiguous
victor of the war," Budiansky writes. He further claims the Americans
achieved everything they wanted in the war, evidence of the peace treaty be
damned. "We stood up to the mightiest sea power on earth. And after it was
over, the British never again tried to mess with American ships," he says
in an interview. He then makes a rather bizarre analogy between the Vietnam War
and the War of 1812, in which the Americans play the role of the Viet Cong.
Whatever it takes to create a winner.
Of course, as Taylor notes, turning
the War of 1812 into an American victory at sea requires ignoring everything
that happened along the Canadian border. The origins of this national amnesia
can be traced back to Theodore Roosevelt. Before he became president in 1901, Roosevelt
wrote a celebrated history of the war that focused exclusively on those few
American naval victories. Discussing the legendary Canadian defence at
Châteauguay, for example, Roosevelt sniffed that "This affair . . . has
been, absurdly enough, designated a 'battle' by most British and Canadian
historians." Rather, he explained, it barely rated a "small
skirmish." Defeat at Châteauguay? Never happened!
"The Americans have been
getting away with this nonsense for two centuries," grouses Canadian
historian Donald Graves, one of Canada's most prolific writers on the War of
1812. "In their version of the war, the fact that they got defeated
doesn't even rate a mention."
This imperative to turn the War of
1812 into a victory for American audiences has carried through to upcoming
bicentennial commemorations as well. Maryland has seized on the War of 1812 as
a way to sell itself to tourists as the birthplace of the national anthem.
Shortly after burning Washington, a British force attempted to take Baltimore, too.
But after bombarding a nearby fort with a spectacular, but entirely
ineffective, rocket attack, the British gave up. It was during this attack that
poet Francis Scott Key wrote the words to the Star-Spangled Banner. A new
Maryland promotional video claims this is the moment that "helps America
win the war."
That claim proves something of an
awkward moment for Bill Pencek, executive director of the Maryland War of 1812
Bicentennial Commission. "Did the U.S. really win the war? Not
really," he admits when pressed. "It was more of a draw."
Nonetheless, money must be raised and tourists attracted. And no one wants to
celebrate a loser.
The same goes at New Orleans, where
the 1815 battle is remembered today by the U.S. National Parks Service as proof
of "American democracy triumphing over the old European ideas of
aristocracy and entitlement."
And as might be expected, the U.S.
Navy is also planning a big splash with the War of 1812, on par with its
efforts in 1976 recognizing the American bicentennial. "Two hundred years
ago we fought for free trade and sailors' rights," says Capt. Patrick
Burns, director of the Office of Navy Commemorations. "And we are still
doing that today." Capt. Burns emphasizes that both the Canadian and
British navies are getting friendly invitations to attend the American
ceremonies, although he adds with obvious enthusiasm: "That a six-frigate
navy could take on the world's largest superpower at the time is just
amazing."
Donald Hickey of Wayne State
College in Nebraska is one of the few American historians to call the war a
loss for the U.S. Nonetheless, he considers the conflict to be an opiate of
history. "Everybody's happy with the outcome of the War of 1812,"
Hickey notes wryly. "Americans are happy because they think they won.
Canadians are happier because they know they won. And the British are happiest
of all because they've forgotten all about it."
In fact, British historians have
recently risen to defend their national honour. In How Britain Won the War of
1812, author Brian Arthur argues that the British naval blockade strangled the
American economy (no pennies were minted in 1815 because the country had ran
out of copper) and forced Washington to sue for peace. "Britain won the
war because the Americans simply ran out of money," he says. Of course
this version also ignores the Canadian land war.
Against these entrenched positions,
Canada does have one advantage. Of the three former combatant nations, only
Canada's federal government is investing heavily to commemorate the war.
Maryland is rare among states in giving it major play. Many historic sites in
the former battle zones of New York and Michigan are facing budget cuts and
layoffs due to financial stresses. And despite the efforts of the U.S. Navy,
there is no U.S. federal office to recognize the war as there is in Canada.
This gives us a rare opportunity to finally out-point our neighbours on North
American history. "You already won the war once," quips Hickey.
"Now you get to win it all over again."
Not that the Canadian government
intends to rub it in. While promising to "make the most of this moment in
Canadian history," Heritage Minister Moore promises to avoid gloating for
fear of antagonizing our sensitive southern neighbours. "This is not a competition,"
he says of the upcoming commemorations. "One of the great outcomes of the
war is the very healthy relationship we've had with the U.S. ever since it
ended." Indeed, every press release from Ottawa regarding the War of 1812
includes at least one boilerplate reference "celebrating two centuries of
peaceful coexistence with the United States."
Then again, if the Americans insist
on imaginatively claiming they won the war, Canadians aren't above a little
creative mythologizing of our own. Consider once more Col. Stone, recently
honoured with a park by the federal government for "successfully
defending" Gananoque from attack early in the war. The fact is, that's not
exactly what happened on Sept. 21, 1812.
When American invaders waded ashore
that night, Col. Stone was nowhere to be found. His leaderless militia fired
one volley at the American raiders and then scampered into the woods, after
which Capt. Forsyth's men set fire to the government storehouse, shot up Col.
Stone's house (wounding Mrs. Stone, who was at home) and absconded with all the
loot they could carry-30 barrels of flour, 12 prisoners, 41 muskets and a large
supply of Stone's personal belongings. "They plundered the place pretty
thoroughly," notes historian Taylor.
For the rest of the war, however, Col.
Stone and his militia did keep the vital St. Lawrence supply route open for the
most part. If his decidedly unsuccessful defence of Gananoque on Sept. 21, 1812
is remembered today by Ottawa as a triumph worth celebrating, it must be
because history is written by the victors.
-------
CANADA WAR 1812- NOVA SCOTIA
Photographs of
Deadman's Island
(actually a peninsula, not an
island)
War of 1812
1812 - 1814
Deadmans Island is the burial site
of some 450 people from
around the world...prisoners of
war...quarantine patients...
refugees...brought to Melville
Island to be housed by
the Royal Navy...a considerable
number died...
- Debate, Nova Scotia Legislature,
29 April 2004
Northwest Arm
Halifax
Nova Scotia
GPS location
Entrance: 44°38'00"N 63°36'33"W
Memorial: 44°38'05"N 63°36'41"W
Photographed on 31 May 2005
the day after the official
commemorative ceremony
on United States Memorial Day 2005
The view from Deadman's Island
looking toward Melville Island
Photographed on 31 May 2005
Photographed at high tide on 31 May
2005
Photographed on 26 December 2003
"2.5 acres of forlorn bogland
surmounted by a spruce knoll"
- Boston Globe, 12 May 2000
Photographed on 28 September 2004
Entrance to Deadman's Island,
Pinehaven Drive
Photographed on 31 May 2005
Entrance to Deadman's Island,
Pinehaven Drive
Photographed on 26 December 2003
Improving the entrance to Deadman's
Island
Photographed on 13 May 2005
Links to Relevant Websites
Deadman's Island
Old war's victims forgotten no
longer:
Privateers of War of 1812 buried in
Halifax
by Colin Nickerson, Boston Globe
page A01 (front page), 12 May 2000
What started as a very local
controversy over this land became a
history lesson that reverberated on
both sides of the border...
US veterans groups and historical
societies got wind of the island's
past, and they were soon pressing
Congress, Canada's ambassador, and
the US State Department to protect
Deadman's Island. The Sons of the
American Revolution passed a
resolution that "any desecration of
this sacred place would dishonor
the memory of these patriots"...
The Wayback Machine has archived
copies of this news story:
Old war's victims forgotten no
longer
Privateers of War of 1812 buried in
Halifax
Boston Globe, 12 May 2000
Archived: 2000 September 02
Archived: 2001 August 20
Archived: 2002 October 21
Archived: 2003 December 11
Archived: 2004 September 05
Archived: 2005 June 19
Archived: 2006 April 05
Archived: 2007 February 05
Archived: 2008 January 16
These links were accessed and found
to be valid on 24 April 2010.
Old war's victims forgotten no
longer: Privateers of War of 1812 buried in Halifax
by Colin Nickerson, Boston Globe
Staff, 12 May 2000
[another copy of the above item]
City Buys Deadman's Island
Halifax NovaNewsNet, 14 February
2000
The Wayback Machine has archived
copies of this news story:
City Buys Deadman's Island
NovaNewsNet Digest, 14 February
2000
Archived: 2002 July 23
stories/99-00/000211/deadman.htm
Archived: 2003 May 21
stories/99-00/000211/deadman.htm
These links were accessed and found
to be valid on 24 April 2010.
Internet alerted American 'War of
1812' buffs of fallen brethren
Halifax NovaNewsNet, 14 February
2000
The Wayback Machine has archived
copies of this news story:
Internet alerted American 'War of
1812' buffs
of fallen brethren
NovaNewsNet Digest, 14 February
2000
Archived: 2002 July 23
stories/99-00/000211/deadman.htm#link3
Archived: 2003 May 21
stories/99-00/000211/deadman.htm#link3
These links were accessed and found
to be valid on 24 April 2010.
Monument Created for N.S. Burial
Ground of U.S. PoWs from War of 1812
On 30 May 2005, a colour party from
the USS USS Constitution,
the world's oldest commissioned warship
afloat, took part in
a ceremony on a tiny island at
Halifax...
The Wayback Machine has archived
copies of this news story:
Monument Created for N.S. Burial
Ground
of U.S. PoWs from War of 1812
Archived: 2006 January 04
National/050530/n0530141A.html
Archived: 2006 May 16
National/050530/n0530141A.html
Archived: 2007 March 14
National/050530/n0530141A.html
These links were accessed and found
to be valid on 24 April 2010.
Deadman's Island monument honours
War of 1812 POWs
Trident: Maritime Forces Atlantic
newspaper, 13 June 2005
Canadian Ceremony Honors U.S. 1812
Dead
Intelligencer-Journal, Lancaster,
Pennsylvania, 30 May 2005
The Wayback Machine has archived
copies of this news story:
Canadian Ceremony Honors U.S. 1812
Dead
Intelligencer-Journal, Lancaster,
Pennsylvania, 30 May 2005
Archived: 2006 January 14
4/canada_us_memorial
Archived: 2006 February 19
4/canada_us_memorial
These links were accessed and found
to be valid on 24 April 2010.
Canadian Ceremony Honors U.S. 1812
Dead
Calkins Newspapers Inc., Levittown,
Pennsylvania
The Bucks County Courier Times, The
Intelligencer,
The Record and the Burlington
County Times
War of 1812 U.S. PoWs Honoured in
N.S.
Nova Scotia Honours Graves of U.S.
PoWs - 1800-1815
HRM News Release: Ceremony to
Commemorate U.S. Military Prisoners
20 April 2005
050420DeadmansIsland.html
HRM News Release:
"Old Ironsides" Colour
Party to Attend Commemorative Ceremony
12 May 2005
050512DeadmanIslandCeremony.html
HRM News Release: Commemorative
Ceremony for Unmarked Graves
24 May 2005
050524DeadmansIslandCeremony.html
HRM Notice to Editors:
Commemorative ceremony on Memorial Day
(Monday, May 30, 2005) for the
close to 200 American War of 1812
prisoners who died while imprisoned
at Halifax, Nova Scotia
pr2005/050526DeadmanIslandnoticetoeditors.html
Deadman's Island, by Harrison Scott
Baker II
President (1996-1999), War of 1812
Society in the State of Ohio
The Wayback Machine has archived
copies of this news story:
Deadman's Island, by Harrison Scott
Baker II
President (1996-1999), War of 1812
Society in the State of Ohi
Archived: 2000 Oct 31 Deadman's Island
Archived: 2000 Dec 10 U.S. Prisoners, War of 1812, died at Halifax
Archived: 2001 Nov 23 Deadman's Island
Archived: 2002 Apr 15 U.S. Prisoners, War of 1812, died at Halifax
Archived: 2002 Jun 16 Deadman's Island
Archived: 2003 Mar 17 Deadman's Island
Archived: 2004 Feb 24 Deadman's Island
Archived: 2004 Aug 06 U.S. Prisoners, War of 1812, died at Halifax
Archived: 2005 Apr 03 Deadman's Island
Archived: 2006 Mar 04 U.S. Prisoners, War of 1812, died at Halifax
Archived: 2006 Jun 20 Deadman's Island
Archived: 2007 Aug 05 Deadman's Island
Archived: 2007 Oct 23 U.S. Prisoners, War of 1812, died at Halifax
These links were accessed and found
to be valid on 24 April 2010.
Where Dead Men Sleep: Halifax's
newest park
by Kelly Shiers, Halifax Sunday
Herald, 30 November 2003
The Wayback Machine has an archived
copy of:
Where Dead Men Sleep: Halifax's
newest park
Halifax Sunday Herald, 30 November
2003
Archived: 2003 December 23
This link was accessed and found to
be valid on 24 April 2010.
Deadman's Island S. S. G. S. News,
20 March 2000
South Shore Genealogical Society
The battle for an historical North
West Arm site is finally over.
The Halifax Regional Municipality
has reached an agreement to purchase
the peninsula known as Deadman's
Island. The Deadman's story caught
the eye of an influential newspaper
in the US because as many as
188 American prisoners of war
likely were buried on the woody knoll
during the War of 1812. About 8,000
Amerrican soldiers captured during
the War of 1812 served time in the
Melville Island military prison...
Graves on Development Site S. S. G.
S. News, July 1998
South Shore Genealogical Society
After a preliminary survey of the
site, an independent archaeologist
concluded it might contain 35
burial sites. "There was little doubt that
Deadman's Island was used as a
burying ground from the early-to-mid-19th
century," he wrote in his
report, which indicates that from 1804 to
at least 1856, Deadmans Island was
a likely burial site for French and
American prisoners of war, refugee
blacks from America, Irish and European
immigrants, and British military
prisoners...
Melville Island by Iris Shea
originally published in the Lake
Erie Ledger, October 1998
...Melville Island Prison became
"home" to more than 8000 Americans
between 1812 and 1815, 1, 200 of
whom served with the US Army Land Forces.
The prison became a place of death
for more than 100 American prisoners.
A burial ground nearby, now known
as Deadman's Island, may contain the
remains of those Americans. No
longer an island, nor is there evidence
it ever was an island, Deadman's
Island is actually a peninsula situated
on the shores of the North West Arm
in Halifax, Nova Scotia, within
a stone's throw of Melville
Island...
Deadman's Island in Jeopardy Summer
1998
Deadman's Island by Mike Campbell
...The people of Halifax purchased
the property in the year 2000 to protect
its special significance as a war
grave and local historic site...Members of
the 164th Civil Engineering
Squadron, Memphis, Tennessee Air National Guard
were working with Canadian colleagues
on joint exercises in Nova Scotia when
they learned of the grave site. On
June 23, 2000, they went to the site and
installed 188 small American
POW/MIA flags...
Deadman's Island NovaNewsNet Digest
for Feb. 10, 2000
Halifax Regional Council has agreed
to buy Deadman's Island on Halifax's
Northwest Arm. Halifax Regional
Municipality will pay $200,000 for the island,
which is the graveyard of historic
Melville Island prison. There may be up
to 400 soldiers buried on the
island, most of them American PoWs captured by
British Forces during the War of
1812. Deadman's Island has been the subject
of several development proposals,
including a plan in 1998 for a 60-unit
apartment building...
Deadman's Island in Hansard
Deadman's Island: Nova Scotia
Legislature, 26 May 1998
Resolution No. 114: Whereas the
proposed development
of Deadmans Island in the Northwest
Arm has aroused opposition...
han57-1/h98may26.htm#[Page%20182]
Deadman's Island: Nova Scotia
Legislature, 29 April 2004
...We asked the question, why is it
called Deadmans Island, did the research,
and although the City of Halifax
felt that it was not worth the designation of
heritage and the province by
extension because of somewhat weak municipal
heritage laws, although that was
not worthy of designation as heritage, at the
moment the American Foreign Legion
is preparing to erect a monument there.
The French Government is interested
and the Spanish Government is
interested, as well, because
Deadmans Island is the burial site of some 450
- I won't break it down for you -
people from around the world, because
people from around the world at
different times, either as prisoners, as
quarantine patients, or as
refugees, were brought to Melville Island to be
housed by the Royal Navy, either as
prisoners or receiving sanctuary and of
those people, a good number
died. Those people were buried in
unmarked
graves on Deadman's Island, a place
not worthy of heritage designation.
Luckily, that much at least is now
being corrected, but it is as a result of the
pressure of governments from
outside this province...
han59-1/house_04apr29.htm#H[Page%202886]
War of 1812: Battles at Sea
War of 1812: The War on the Waters
...In only one case, that of HMS
Shannon and USS Chesapeake did the
British prevail, and the victor
brought the unfortunate Chesapeake
to Halifax harbour...
American Vessels Captured by the
British American Revolution and War of 1812
Records of the Vice-Admiralty Court
at Halifax, Nova Scotia
American Vessels Captured by the
British
A list of American prizes recorded
on the Halifax station
American Revolution and War of 1812
(These webpages only cover ship's
names beginning with the letter A)
Prize List A1
Prize List A2
Prize List A3
The Standing Interrogatories
The 32 questions listed here are
the Standing Interrogatories which were
used in the War of 1812. They are the questions which were put to the
captured crew of a prize vessel and
give a good indication of the range of
material which can be found in
Prize court records. To be administered
on behalf of Our Sovereign Lord
George the Third... To all Commanders,
Masters, Officers, mariners, and
other Persons found on board any Ships
and Vessels, which may have been,
or shall be seized or taken as Prize by
any of His Majesty's Ships or
Vessels... examined as Witnesses in
preparatory during the present
hostilities with the United States of
America. Let each witness be interrogated to every of
the following
Questions; and their answers to
each Interrogatory written down...
The Canadian Privateering Homepage
by Dan Conlin
Prince of Neufchatel, American
Privateer in the War of 1812
Overview: American Privateer,
Prince of Neufchatel
...The American frigates were
bigger, faster, tougher, and more lethal
than their British counterparts and
could defeat them in one-on-one conflict.
However, British numbers were far
superior, and a British blockade eventually
tied the frigates up in harbor...
life/war1812/privateer/overview.htm
William James
A writer on naval history, William
James was from 1801 to 1813 enrolled
among the attorneys of the supreme
court of Jamaica, and practised as a
proctor in the vice-admiralty
court. In 1812 he was in the United
States,
and on the declaration of war with
England was detained as a prisoner.
After several month's captivity he
effected his escape, and reached Halifax
towards the end of 1813...In March
1816 he published a pamphlet entitled
"An Inquiry into the Merits of
the Principal Naval Actions between
Great Britain and the United
States"...The excitement which the pamphlet
caused both in Nova Scotia and the
States was considerable...
The information below was compiled
by William James
from contemporary accounts
Naval Actions
USS Constitution
HMS Guerriere
19 August 1812
USS Wasp
HMS Frolic
18 September 1812
USS United-States
HMS Macedonian
25 October 1812
USS Constitution
HMS Java
28 December 1812
USS Hornet
HMS Peacock
24 February 1813
USS Chesapeake
HMS Shannon
1 June 1813
USS Argus
HMS Pelican
14 August 1813
USS Enterprise
HMS Boxer
5 September 1813
USS Essex
HMS Phoebe
28 March 1814
USS Frolic
HMS Orpheus
20 April 1814
USS Peacock
HMS Epervier
29 April 1814
USS Wasp
HMS Reindeer
28 June 1814
USS Wasp
HMS Avon
1 September 1814
USS President
HMS Endymion
15 January 1815
USS Constitution
HMS Levant & Cyane
20 February 1815
USS Hornet
HMS Penguin
23 March 1815
USS Peacock
HEICS Nautilus
30 June 1815
HEIC: Honourable East India Company
HMS: His Majesty's Ship
USS: United States Ship
Privateer Actions
Saratoga
Rachel
11 December 1812
Decatur
HMS Dominica
5 August 1813
Chasseur
HMS St. Lawrence
26 February 1815
Events of the War of 1812: A
Chronology compiled by Robert Henderson
Chapter 6: The War of 1812 American
Military History, Army Historical Series
Office of the Chief of Military
History, United States Army
To Great Britain the War of 1812
was simply a burdensome adjunct of its
greater struggle against Napoleonic
France. To the Canadians it was
clearly a case of naked American
aggression. But to the Americans it
was neither simple nor clear. The United States entered the war with
confused objectives and divided
loyalties...
War of 1812: Official Documents
International Treaties, etc.
A Provisional Agreement, for the
Exchange of Naval Prisoners of War
November 28, 1812
by the Avalon Project at the Yale
Law School
The Government of the United States
of America having sent to Halifax
JOHN MITCHELL, Esquire, late Consul
of the United States of America at
St. Jago de Cuba, to act as Agent
on the Part of the United States of
America, for the purpose of
adjusting with the Admiral Commanding at
Halifax and the West-Indies the
Exchange of Prisoners taken at sea;
And His Excellency the Right
Honourable Sir JOHN BORLASE WARREN,
a Privy Counsellor in the United
Kingdom of Great-Britain and Ireland,
Knight of the Most Honourable Order
of the Bath, Knight of the Crescent,
Admiral of the Blue, and Commander
in Chief of all His Majesty's Ships
of War stationed on the coasts of
North America and the West-Indies,
having appointed RICHARD JOHN UNIACKE,
Esquire, a Member of the
Honourable His Majesty's Council,
and the Attorney and Advocate General
of His Majesty for the Province of
Nova-Scotia, and WILLIAM MILLER,
Esquire, Lieutenant in the Royal
Navy and Agent for Prisoners of War
at Halifax, as Agents to treat with
the said JOHN MITCHELL on the part
of His Majesty's Government for the
Exchange of such of His Majesty's
Subjects as have been or may
hereafter be captured at sea, by the public
or private Ships of War belonging
to the United States of America, for
the American Prisoners which have
been or hereafter may be taken at sea
by His Majesty's Ships of War and
Privateers; and the said Agents having
met and discussed the Matters to
them referred, have agreed upon the
following Articles...
Cartel for the Exchange of
Prisoners of War Between Great Britain and
the United States of America May
12, 1813
by the Avalon Project at the Yale
Law School
The Provisional agreement for the
exchange of naval prisoners of war,
made and concluded at Halifax in
the province of Nova Scotia on the
28th day of November 1812 between
the Honourable Richard John Uniacke
His Britannic Majestys attorney and
advocate General for the province
of Nova Scotia and William Miller
Esquire Lieutenant in the Royal navy
and agent for Prisoners of War at
Halifax; and John Mitchell Esquire
late consul of the united states at
St Jago de Cuba, american agent
for Prisoners of war at Halifax,
having been transmitted to the
Department of state of the United
States for approval and John Mason
Esquire Commissary General for
Prisoners for the United States having
been duely authorised to meet
Thomas Barclay Esquire his Britanic
Majestys agent for Prisoners of war
and for carrying on an exchange
of Prisoners for the purpose of
considering and revising the said
provisional agreement and the
articles of the said agreement having
been by them considered and
discussed-it has been agreed by the said
Thomas Barclay and John Mason
subject to the ratification of both
their governments that the said
provisional agreement shall be so
altered and revised as to stand
expressed in the following words...
Decision of the Commissioners under
Article 4 of the Treaty of Ghent,
signed at New York November 24,
1817
by the Avalon Project at the Yale
Law School
Commissioners, appointed by virtue
of the fourth Article of the
Treaty of Peace and Amity between
His Britannic Majesty and The
United States of America concluded
at Ghent on the twenty fourth
day of december One Thousand eight
hundred and fourteen to decide
to which of the two Contracting
parties to the said Treaty the
several Islands in the Bay of
Passamaquoddy which is part of the
Bay of Fundy and the Island of
Grand Menan in the said Bay of Fundy
do respectively belong in
conformity with the true intent of the
second Article of the Treaty of
Peace of One Thousand seven hundred
and eighty three between His said
Britannic Majesty and the
aforesaid United States of
America...
War of 1812
Records Relating to
American Prisoners of War
Records Relating to American
Prisoners of War, (1812-1815)
eleven microfilm reels
Special Collections Division,
University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri -
The records relating to Americans
taken prisoner by British forces
during the War of 1812 form a
portion of the Admiralty records in the
Public Records Office. The largest
group of material is Medical Department:
Registers. This consists of ledgers
of information on American
prisoners-of-war for prison ships
and depots. The records were generated
in the process of receiving and
housing prisoners and monitoring their
passage through the prison system.
The ledgers recorded prisoners by
number, name, place of birth, age,
and physical attributes. They also
recorded how the prisoners were
taken, time and place of capture,
ship from which prisoners were
taken, supplies issued, and disposition
of the prisoners. American
prisoners were detained in
England (8 locations), Canada (3
locations), Bermuda, New Providence,
Barbadoes, Jamaica, Gibraltar,
Malta, and Cape of Good Hope.
------------------
DUAL CITIZENSHIP CANADA
Dual Citizenship
Canada and the UK accept dual citizenship (also called “dual
nationality”). A person may hold both citizenships and may
carry both British and Canadian passports if they so desire.
A Canadian citizen may retain
Canadian citizenship, unless (s)he voluntarily applies to renounce it and the
application has been approved by the citizenship judge.
The present Act makes it possible
to have two or more citizenships and allegiances at the same time for an
indefinite period.
Additional details can be found in
the Dual
Citizenship section of the Citizenship and Immigration Canada website.
LIVING/WORKING
ABROAD- Canada
Living abroad – A Canadian's guide to working, studying,
volunteering or retiring in a foreign country
Contents
Other formats
Introduction
The world beyond our borders is home to about three million
Canadians. Like you, they each have their own reasons for choosing to live in a
foreign land, whether to work, study, volunteer, retire or pursue other
opportunities. Residing abroad – either permanently or temporarily – can
be a rich and rewarding experience.
It can also be challenging, particularly if you move to
another country based on a dream, without considering the risks and
responsibilities. The decision to leave familiar surroundings and adapt to
another social and cultural environment should not be taken lightly. It
requires thorough research, knowledge and planning. The better prepared you are
before leaving Canada, the better your experience abroad will be.
The Government of Canada assists thousands of Canadians
residing in foreign countries each year. With more than 260 offices in 150
countries worldwide – plus an Emergency Watch and Response Centre in
Ottawa – we’re at your service 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
While there are limits to the help we can give you, we offer a vast range of
consular services, from replacing lost passports and sharing information on
local laws to lending support during natural disasters and medical emergencies.
We’re well aware of the challenges you’ll face while living
abroad. That’s why we’ve developed this booklet to help you:
inform and prepare yourself before leaving Canada;
take care of yourself and your loved ones while abroad;
know what to do if things don’t work out as expected; and
plan for your eventual return.
Questions about foreign travel?
Is it safe to go there?
Could I get sick?
Who can I contact for emergency help?
Can the Government of Canada get me out of a foreign jail?
What should I do if I lose my passport?
Do I have to pay taxes on foreign income?
What can I bring back to Canada?
Answers: Travel.gc.ca
We urge you to read this booklet as well as our main
publication, Bon voyage,
but… essential information for Canadian travellers. Also be sure to
visit Travel.gc.ca – your
official source of information on international travel. And have a safe,
healthy and happy stay abroad!
Before leaving Canada
Complete a risk assessment
It’s important to consider not only the rewards but also the
risks of relocating abroad. Be sure to complete a risk assessment of each
possible host country in order to identify a safe and suitable destination. If
you’re daunted by the perils and inconveniences of a particular destination,
then rule it out.
A risk assessment will pinpoint concerns you should be aware
of, such as safety and security, health conditions and the political, economic,
cultural and natural environment, as well as precautions you can take. For
example:
Some countries experience continuing wars, insurgencies and
civil unrest.
Others are subject to extreme temperatures and natural
disasters, such as typhoons, earthquakes and volcanic eruptions.
The pace of life may be very different from what you’re used
to, affecting your work habits and well-being.
Safe and comfortable housing may be scarce or prohibitively
expensive.
There may be no wheelchair access or allowances for people
with hearing, sight or other special needs.
The consumption of alcohol may be illegal, or persons
convicted of drug-related offences may face capital punishment.
Children may be tried, convicted and incarcerated as adults
for their crimes.
To carry out a risk assessment:
Start by consulting the travel advice
for your prospective host country to see if an official Government of Canada
Travel Advisory is in effect and to obtain information on safety and security,
local laws and customs, health conditions and entry requirements.
Consult the Country
Insights page on the Centre for Intercultural Learning website for
cultural information, facts and advice on showing sensitivity to local customs
around the world.
Visit our Travel health and safety
page and the World Health Organization’s website
for country-specific information on health conditions and standards of medical
care.
Get weather and climate information on countries worldwide
on the World Weather Information Service
website.
Supplement these resources with guidebooks, newsletters,
magazines and websites for expatriates. They offer insight into the health,
safety, cultural and emotional issues experienced by Canadians living abroad.
Read up, register, reach us
The Government of Canada encourages Canadians to follow the
Three Rs of international travel:
Read up on safety and security, local laws and customs,
entry requirements, health conditions and other key travel topics by consulting
our Country travel advice and advisories.
Register with us through the Registration of Canadians Abroad service
before leaving Canada, so we can contact and assist you in an emergency abroad,
such as a hurricane or civil unrest, or inform you about an emergency at home.
Reach us at our Emergency
Watch and Response Centre in Ottawa for urgent assistance while
abroad.
Carefully evaluate opportunities abroad
A wide range of work, study, volunteer and retirement
opportunities can be found outside Canada. To ensure a successful experience
abroad, be sure to thoroughly evaluate any opportunity before moving forward:
Beware of international fraud. Steer clear of overseas
recruitment agencies that operate solely by email or telephone and organizations
that charge placement fees. Bogus groups offering international education
opportunities have cheated students out of large sums of money under the
pretext of securing admissions, financial aid and study permits. Likewise,
phony volunteer placement agencies have charged unsuspecting recruits for
opportunities that never pan out. And there’s no lack of international scammers
who target retirees with empty promises of romance, friendship and financial
rewards in faraway lands.
If you’re a woman, be especially wary of offers that sound
too good to be true. Beware of the danger of getting trapped into sex or labour
trafficking. Criminals often recruit foreign women through fraudulent ads to
work as hostesses, models, entertainers, nannies, maids or in other seemingly
legitimate jobs.
Find out everything you can about any agency that’s offering
you an opportunity abroad. Ask for references, visit its website and call your
local Better Business Bureau (if the organization is Canadian). Contact others
who’ve worked for the organization or speak to someone currently employed
there.
Never accept a job overseas if the details won’t be spelled
out until you arrive. Examine the terms of your contract carefully and have it
reviewed by a lawyer if possible. Verify the conditions to break your contract
if things don’t work out.
Make sure you fully understand the financial conditions of
any job offer. Know when you’ll receive your first paycheque and in what
currency you’ll be paid. Receiving your salary in Canadian or U.S. dollars
could prevent problems caused by exchange rate fluctuations. If you’ll be paid
in the local currency, find out if it’s convertible and if there are
restrictions on taking funds out of the country. Check if your employer will
cover expenses, such as airfares, residency permits, language training, school
tuition, and health and dental insurance (including coverage for family
members).
If your contract provides for accommodations, ask for photos
or a detailed description, floor plan and furniture inventory in advance.
“Western” and “furnished” have different meanings in different countries. Ask
about the neighbourhood and local transport. Check whether you’ll be sharing
accommodations with someone else.
Note that, while some employers and volunteer agencies may
promise to pay for your return flight to Canada upon completion of a contract,
this commitment will not necessarily be honoured. It’s best to request an
open-ended return ticket in advance.
Are you ready for a cross-cultural move?
Many Canadians who live abroad for the first time are
surprised at the cultural isolation they experience, making the transition even
more stressful. Before you leave Canada, make an effort to understand the
social environment where you’ll be living. Are you at ease with stark cultural
differences? Are you prepared to be in a minority and to be treated as a
foreigner? Do you make new friends easily? Are you open to different ways of
doing things? Can you handle a much slower – or faster – pace
of life?
International Experience Canada
Young Canadians can choose from thousands of opportunities
to travel and work in foreign countries. These programs are made possible
through reciprocal arrangements negotiated with host countries by Foreign
Affairs, Trade and Development Canada. Participants aged 18 to 35 can enjoy the
many benefits of living and working abroad, while gaining valuable global
experience and skills.
For more information, call 1-877-461-2346, email experience@international.gc.ca
or visit the International
Experience Canada website.
A little planning goes a long way
Forward thinking is the key to a safe and successful stay
abroad. The following steps will help you pull the pieces together before
leaving Canada.
Read our safe-travel booklet Bon voyage,
but… essential information for Canadian travellers, which offers the
knowledge and advice you need to travel responsibly and with confidence, while
avoiding the pitfalls you could experience in foreign countries. It also
outlines consular services available to you around the world.
Ensure that you and all accompanying family members have a
Canadian passport that’s valid for at least six months beyond your intended
return to Canada. Obtain any work, study, volunteer, visitor or other visas
required by your host country well in advance. Know the terms of each visa, as
you could be arrested for violating visa conditions in some countries. See Moving abroad
with children and Required
travel documents for more information.
Leave copies of important travel documents with family or
friends in Canada in case of loss or theft. Scan these documents, if possible,
and send them to yourself at an email address you can access anywhere.
Make sure you have travel health insurance that covers all
medical expenses for illness or injury (including hospitalization abroad and
medical evacuation), plus insurance for loss or theft of valuables, damage to
baggage, and flight cancellations or interruptions.
Sign up for the Registration
of Canadians Abroad service, so that the Government of Canada can
contact and assist you in case of an emergency. Once you’ve registered,
remember to keep your account up to date.
Carry an Emergency
contact card with the coordinates of the nearest Canadian government
office in your host country, in case you have problems while abroad.
Arrange in advance for safe accommodations in your host
country. Suitable housing may be scarce and expensive in locations with low
vacancy rates, and you may have to book through an agency. If you can’t find
long-term lodgings beforehand, at least make plans for temporary housing.
Before paying a deposit for student housing or other lodgings advertised
online, be sure to confirm that the address exists. See A roof over
your head for further advice.
Find out well in advance what you’re allowed to take with
you. Keep in mind that most countries have stringent import controls. Obtain
any necessary adapters for electrical appliances you intend to bring. If you’re
bringing valuable items, take advantage of a free service offered by Canada Border
Services Agency (CBSA) offices to identify items with serial numbers
or other unique markings. The CBSA can apply a sticker to other items so they
can be identified for customs purposes upon your return to Canada.
If you’re taking a pet overseas, contact the embassy or
consulate of your host country to obtain information on all requirements. Your
pet will need a detailed health certificate and may require an import permit.
It may also need to undergo a quarantine period before entering the country.
Make sure your mail is moving with you. Submit a change of
address request to Canada Post and inform all your contacts of your new
address.
Make a will before you leave Canada. If the worst happens,
it will reduce the complications associated with a death abroad. Consider
making two wills – one for Canada and one for the host country –
since different legislation will apply.
Registration of Canadians Abroad
A free service that could save your life
If you’ll be travelling or living abroad, sign up for the
Registration of Canadians Abroad service. Registration enables us to reach you
in case of an emergency abroad, such as an earthquake or civil unrest, or
inform you about an emergency at home.
Sign up online, by mail, by fax or in person. For more
information, visit our Registration
of Canadians Abroad page or call 1-800-267-6788 (in Canada and the
U.S.) or 613-944-6788.
*Information obtained through registration is confidential
and is used in accordance with the provisions of Canada’s Privacy Act.
Dual citizenship – blessing or burden?
You’re allowed by Canadian law to have more than one
nationality. Having dual or multiple citizenships can offer advantages,
including employment opportunities, unrestricted residency, property ownership,
and entitlement to education, health care, pensions and other social programs
abroad.
There are also disadvantages. Your Canadian citizenship may
not be recognized in the country of your other nationality, whose authorities
may prevent Canada from providing you with consular assistance. This situation
is especially likely if you enter that country as one of its citizens, rather
than using your Canadian passport. As a citizen, you may be subject to laws
that would not apply to a foreigner, compelled to do military service, required
to pay taxes, liable for reimbursing educational costs or subject to heightened
scrutiny by immigration and security officials. Being a citizen of another
country doesn’t necessarily mean you can work there. You may not meet the
residency requirements. Or you may have lost your citizenship status when you
became Canadian. Dual citizenship can also cause problems in a third country if
there’s confusion over which citizenship you used to gain entry.
Temporary versus permanent residency
Most Canadians who intend to live abroad for a temporary study
period, volunteer service or seasonal retirement will choose to maintain their
Canadian residency. Those who don’t plan to return regularly to Canada, and who
can obtain sufficient health-care protection abroad, may opt for permanent
residency – or even citizenship – in their host country. Doing so
means establishing legal status in the other country, which entails a variety
of conditions, requirements and obligations well beyond those of a tourist or
visitor. It could also have serious consequences. For example, Canadian
consular officials may be unable to assist you if you run into problems in a
foreign country where you have legal status.
You can minimize the risks of living in the country of your
other nationality by taking these steps:
Confirm your citizenship status – and that of
accompanying family members – and address your concerns to appropriate
officials of the country in question through its embassy or consulate in
Canada.
Find out if you have obligations to that country, such as
taxes, military service or repayment of educational costs. Ask for written
confirmation.
If permitted by the laws of the other country, use your
Canadian passport to gain entry and present yourself as a Canadian citizen to
local authorities.
Contact the nearest Canadian embassy or consulate
immediately if you run into problems associated with dual citizenship.
For more information, see our publication Dual
citizenship – what you need to know.
Did you know...?
You cannot use a Certificate of Canadian Citizenship instead
of a Canadian passport to travel abroad. A Certificate of Canadian Citizenship
is not a travel document. A Canadian passport is the only reliable and
universally accepted travel and identification document available to Canadians
for the purpose of international travel. Canadian citizens returning to Canada
who present other documents, such as a Certificate of Canadian Citizenship,
birth certificate, provincial driver’s licence or foreign passport, instead of
a Canadian passport, may face delays or be denied boarding by transport
companies.
Your health on the move
No matter where in the world you live, your health is your
highest priority. Be sure to plan for long-term health needs before leaving
Canada.
The Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) recommends that
you and each family member visit a travel health clinic or your health-care
provider – preferably six weeks before departure – for a
health assessment. This examination will determine your need for immunizations,
preventive medication and any precautions to help avoid disease while abroad. A
health assessment could also include check-ups with a dentist and optometrist,
as well as a psychological evaluation to help prepare for life in a new
environment.
In case of an emergency...
Consular assistance is available 24 hours a day, seven days
a week. If you run into problems while living abroad:
Phone our Emergency Watch and Response Centre in Ottawa at
613-996-8885 (call collect where service is available).
Email us at sos@international.gc.ca.
Or complete an Emergency
Contact Form.
Consular assistance is available 24 hours a day, seven days
a week. If you run into problems while living abroad:
Phone our Emergency Watch and Response Centre in Ottawa at
613-996-8885 (call collect where service is available).
Email us at sos@international.gc.ca.
Or complete an Emergency
Contact Form.
Vaccinations
Living in a foreign country could expose you and
accompanying family members to infectious diseases that are rarely, if ever,
seen in Canada. Based on your current health status, immunization history and
anticipated itinerary, a health-care provider can assess your individual health
risks and advise you on vaccination requirements, your need for preventive
medication (e.g., for malaria) and personal protective measures.
Make sure your routine immunizations – tetanus,
diphtheria, whooping cough (pertussis), polio, measles, mumps and
rubella – are up to date. Proof of yellow fever vaccination in the past 10
years and an International Certificate of Vaccination or Prophylaxis may be
required to enter some countries. Be aware that some vaccinations and
preventive medications can take time to become effective.
If you’re moving abroad with infants or children, you may
need to arrange an alternative or accelerated childhood immunization schedule
for them. Consult your pediatrician, family doctor or travel health
practitioner. For more information, visit our Travel health and safety page.
Medication
If you take medication, pack an extra supply – or
arrange for refills – since you’ll be abroad for an extended period. Carry
a duplicate of your prescription, showing the product’s generic and trade
names, in case your medication is stolen or lost. Also keep any optical
prescriptions on hand for easier replacement of eyeglasses or contacts.
Never try to save luggage space by combining medications in
one container. Keep all medications in their original, labelled containers to
avoid customs problems.
Some medications sold over the counter in Canada are illegal
or require a prescription in other countries. Find out whether your medication
is legal in your host country. Obtain a note from your doctor stating the
medical reasons for your prescription and the recommended dosage.
If you need syringes for a medical condition or an
autoinjector for life-threatening allergies, it’s important to take along
adequate supplies or to have a plan to replenish them. Also carry a medical
certificate confirming that these items are for medical use.
If you have a pre-existing medical condition or allergies
that could flare up while you’re abroad, consider wearing a MedicAlert®
bracelet or necklace, which will be linked to your medical records and make
them accessible 24 hours a day from anywhere in the world.
STI prevention
Carry a supply of condoms to protect yourself from sexually
transmitted infections and to guard against unwanted pregnancy, even if you
don’t expect to meet a new partner abroad. Condoms may not be available in your
destination country or may not meet the safety standards set by the World Health
Organization. For more information, see our Sexually transmitted infections (STI) page.
Well on your way.
Would you like to learn more about protecting your health
while abroad? Our publication "Well on your way" offers valuable
advice on how to:
assess travel health risks;
take preventive measures before, during and after
international travel;
choose an appropriate travel health insurance plan;
cope with a health emergency abroad; and
obtain consular services in the event of a medical
emergency.
To order your booklet today, call 1-800-267-8376 (in Canada)
or 613-944-4000, or download a
copy.
Pregnancy and birth
If you’ll be pregnant while living abroad or expect to give
birth in a foreign country, be sure to see your doctor before leaving Canada.
Make sure your supplementary health insurance covers pregnancy-related
conditions, pre-term and full-term birth and neonatal care. Try to avoid malarial
zones, as expectant mothers are particularly vulnerable to the illness, which
could put their pregnancy at risk. If you’re going to give birth outside
Canada, identify beforehand a local hospital or birthing facility that’s up to
Canadian standards, if possible. For information on the citizenship of children
born to Canadian parents abroad, see Canadian
birthright.
More information on travelling while pregnant can be found
on our Travelling
while pregnant page and in our booklet Her own way:
a woman’s safe-travel guide.
Accessibility for disabled travellers
Many countries don’t provide specific access for people in
wheelchairs or assist those with hearing, sight or other physical requirements.
You may need to make special arrangements abroad to obtain the services you’d
normally expect in Canada. For country-specific information on accessibility
for disabled travellers, consult the website of
Disabled Peoples’ International.
Holders of disabled parking permits in Canada may use them
in member or associate member countries of the International Transport Forum
(ITF). Be sure to check with local authorities to confirm your entitlement.
Parking permits for disabled Canadians are rarely recognized in non-ITF
countries. For details, see the ITF website.
Further information on government services for disabled
travellers, meeting special needs, parking privileges and travelling with a
service animal is available on our Travelling
with disabilities page.
Purchase the best insurance you can afford
Don’t expect your provincial or territorial health plan to
cover the costs if you get sick or are injured while living abroad.
Out-of-country medical bills can be steep and result in a heavy financial
burden. There’s nothing worse than being ill in a foreign country while
worrying about spiralling medical costs. Your provincial or territorial health
plan will cover only part, if any, of medical expenses outside Canada and will
not pay up front. Furthermore, it will become invalid if you live elsewhere
beyond a certain length of time – generally six to eight months, depending
on your province or territory. For more information, contact your regional
health authority.
No matter how long you’ll be living abroad, be sure to
purchase the best health insurance you can afford. It’s one of the most
important investments you can make as an expatriate. Make sure you understand the
terms of your policy. It should cover your personal health needs and those of
any dependants. If you’ll be working in your destination country, check whether
your employer will provide health insurance that meets your requirements.
Always carry proof of your insurance while abroad, along
with contact information for your insurer. Leave a copy with a friend or
relative in Canada. If you pay for your own medical care, obtain a detailed
invoice from the doctor or hospital in order to make a claim later. Most
insurers will not accept copies or faxes.
Supplemental insurance versus replacement insurance
Two types of private health-care insurance are available to
expatriates. Supplemental insurance provides added benefits to those covered by
a provincial or territorial plan. Replacement insurance provides full coverage
for those who stay abroad long enough to become ineligible for a Canadian plan.
Full replacement insurance is less readily available than
supplemental insurance, but a number of companies do provide insurance
specifically designed for expatriates. When considering replacement insurance,
carefully assess your own situation, taking into account your age, pre-existing
medical conditions and potential needs in the event of a major or long-term
illness. Be sure to arrange for replacement insurance before leaving Canada and
check that the policy is valid in the country where you plan to stay.
Two types of private health-care insurance are available to
expatriates. Supplemental insurance provides added benefits to those covered by
a provincial or territorial plan. Replacement insurance provides full coverage
for those who stay abroad long enough to become ineligible for a Canadian plan.
Full replacement insurance is less readily available than
supplemental insurance, but a number of companies do provide insurance
specifically designed for expatriates. When considering replacement insurance,
carefully assess your own situation, taking into account your age, pre-existing
medical conditions and potential needs in the event of a major or long-term
illness. Be sure to arrange for replacement insurance before leaving Canada and
check that the policy is valid in the country where you plan to stay.
Shop around for the best health insurance for a long-term
stay abroad. Ask if the policy:
provides coverage whether or not your provincial/territorial
health plan remains in effect;
offers a worldwide 24-hour/seven-day emergency contact
number in English and translation services for health-care providers in your
host country;
pays immediately for foreign medical costs or requires you
to pay up front and seek reimbursement later;
provides a cash deposit in advance if required by a
hospital;
covers both health and dental care for the full duration of
your stay abroad;
covers pre-existing medical conditions, such as borderline
diabetes and heart disease (ask for written confirmation);
includes coverage for injuries resulting from adventure
activities, such as mountaineering and scuba-diving;
provides for a medical evacuation to Canada or the nearest
location with appropriate medical facilities;
covers premature births and related neonatal care;
pays expenses associated with a death abroad, including the
repatriation to Canada of the ashes or remains of the deceased;
provides coverage during visits to Canada or other travel
while abroad; and
covers the period before your provincial/territorial plan is
renewed upon your return to Canada.
Did you know…?
In addition to health insurance, you should consider getting
enhanced life and disability insurance. You’ll also need insurance that offers
coverage for flight cancellation, trip interruption and lost luggage, as well
as cargo insurance for automobiles, household goods and other personal effects.
Insurance coverage can prevent major disruptions and additional costs when
relocating abroad.
For more suggestions on what to look for when buying travel
health insurance, consult our booklet Well on your
way: a Canadian’s guide to healthy travel abroad.
Did you know…?
Some insurance companies will not honour medical claims made
for injuries suffered in a country where a Government of
Canada Travel Advisory is in effect.
Moving abroad with children
Moving to a foreign country can be one of the most enriching
experiences a child will ever have, giving rise to greater confidence,
adaptability and intercultural awareness. But meeting your children’s needs can
also add stress to the already considerable challenges of relocating abroad.
Before leaving Canada, take steps to ensure a smooth transition for you and
your family.
Be sure to have an open discussion with your children so
they can express their feelings and concerns about moving abroad.
Arrange for appropriate daycare or schooling. Make sure
you’re satisfied with the standards of daycare offered in your destination
country. Contact the country’s education authorities for information about the
school system. In addition to public and private schools, most countries have
international schools, attended mainly by expatriate children. Have copies of
your children’s school records in case they’re needed.
Remember that immigration officials are vigilant about
documentation for children crossing international borders. Unless children
under 18 are accompanied by both parents, we strongly recommend that they carry
a consent letter proving they have permission to travel from every person with
the legal right to make major decisions on their behalf. We advise you to have
the consent letter certified, stamped or sealed by an official with the
authority to administer an oath or solemn declaration. A sample consent letter,
as well as an interactive form that you can use to compose your own letter, are
available here.
Make sure each child has a valid Canadian passport and
supporting identification, such as a birth certificate or citizenship card.
Check with the destination country’s embassy or consulate in Canada regarding
additional entry conditions and documentation that may be required, including
divorce papers, custody court orders or a death certificate (if one parent is
deceased).
Keep additional identification in your child’s pocket in
case you’re separated. Carry recent photographs of the child for emergency
identification purposes.
Seek advice from a lawyer if a custody dispute might develop
while your child is living abroad. Custody arrangements in Canada may not be
recognized in another country. In extreme cases, you or your child may not be
allowed to return to Canada. Check with the destination country’s embassy or
consulate in Canada before moving abroad.
Consult with a pediatrician on how best to protect your
child’s health while living abroad.
For more information, consultour page Children and
travel.
Required travel documents
Make sure your passport, necessary visas and other documents
are in order before leaving Canada.
Your Canadian passport
A Canadian passport is the only reliable and universally
accepted travel and identification document for Canadians. You and each family
member must have a valid passport to travel or reside outside Canada.
Canadian passports for children up to 15 years of age are
valid for five years. Passports for persons 16 years of age and older are valid
for five or 10 years, depending on the chosen validity period.
Contact the embassy or consulate of your destination country
to determine its rules and restrictions concerning passport validity. Some
countries require that your passport be valid for at least six months beyond
the date of your expected return to Canada. Plan to renew your passport before
your return date if it will expire while you’re abroad.
If you need to apply for or renew your passport, start the
process well before your planned departure from Canada. Allow more time if you
need a visa, since you’ll need to obtain a passport first.
Application forms are available online on the Passport Canada website
and in person at all Passport
Canada offices, Service
Canada centres, Canada Post
outlets and Canadian
government offices abroad.
Keep the following items on hand to make it easier to
replace a passport that’s lost or stolen while you’re abroad:
a photocopy of the identification (photo) page of your
passport;
the original of your birth or citizenship certificate;
a copy of at least one other document to support your
identity;
contact information for a Canadian government office in your
destination country; and
two recent photos meeting Passport Canada specifications
(taken within one year and reflecting your current appearance).
If your passport is lost or stolen while you’re outside
Canada, report the incident to the local police and to Passport Canada or the
nearest Canadian government office abroad.
For more information on how to apply for, care for or
replace a Canadian passport, consult our Passport page.
Did you know…?
Only the government of your host country has the authority
to grant you a visa. The Government of Canada cannot intervene on your behalf.
Visas
You need a visa to stay in most countries for more than
three months. The most common categories are work, student, volunteer and
residency visas. However, you may also need a tourist, business, visitor or
other visa for a short-term stay.
If you plan to exit and re-enter your host country during
your stay, inquire about a multiple-entry visa to avoid future problems. Be
sure to obtain visas well in advance. Don’t count on entering a country as a
tourist in hopes of changing your visa classification later on. Understand and
respect visa terms and conditions. Staying in a country without the right visa
or overstaying a visa expiry date is illegal and may result in imprisonment, a
stiff fine and/or deportation.
Requirements and processing times will vary, depending on
the type of visa you need. In order to grant you a visa, some countries
require:
a certified criminal record check through the RCMP or your
local police;
a medical certificate signed by a doctor, demonstrating that
you’re in good health and free of specific contagious diseases;
a certificate of a negative test for human immunodeficiency
virus (HIV); and
a yellow fever vaccination certificate (if you’re arriving
from an infected area).
Further details on visa requirements are available on the Country travel advice and advisories
page or from the embassy or consulate of your destination country.
Remember to check the visa requirements of countries you may transit en route
to your host country or visit during your stay abroad.
Work visa or permit: All countries require you to have
special permission to enter if you’ll be employed while living there. Your
prospective employer may have to sponsor you for a work visa or permit. It may
also be your employer’s responsibility to obtain the document, or you may have
to do so yourself through your host country’s embassy or consulate in Canada.
It can take months to obtain a work visa, so start the process well before your
departure. Know the implications if you decide to change jobs after your
arrival. Doing so may render your visa invalid, or you may have to leave and
re-enter the country under a different one.
Working holiday visa: Canada has reciprocal agreements with
numerous countries to encourage cultural exchanges by enabling travellers to
experience living abroad while undertaking short-term employment.
Student visa: Most countries require you to have a student
visa to undertake temporary or long-term studies. A residency visa or permit
may also be required.
Volunteer visa: Some countries require you to have a
volunteer visa to undertake unpaid or charitable activities. Others demand a
work visa or permit, even if you’re a volunteer.
Residency visa or permit: If you stay in a country beyond
the period allowed by a typical tourist visa (usually three to six months) for
reasons such as retirement abroad, you’ll need a residency visa or permit.
Marriage or spousal visa: Some countries will grant you a
marriage or spousal visa, usually with a specific validity period, if you’re
married to – or intend to marry – one of their citizens or permanent
residents.
Alien registration card: Upon arrival in your host country,
you may be required to obtain an alien registration card. You’ll have to carry
it at all times for identification purposes and as proof of your status, then
return it to local authorities before your departure.
Calculate the costs
Before leaving Canada, make sure you can afford to relocate
abroad.
Look into the cost of living in your destination country,
since an average salary in Canada isn’t adequate everywhere. Allow for
inflation and exchange rate fluctuations that will likely occur while you’re
abroad.
Know the cost of shipping personal and household effects.
Take only what you need and find out what you can buy in your destination
country. If you’ll be working or volunteering, find out if your employer or
recruiter will cover the cost of moving your belongings or provide you with
essentials when you arrive.
Make sure you have enough money to get properly settled,
including funds to cover expenses such as a rental security deposit and utility
connections. Good accommodations are expensive in many countries, especially if
you need a furnished home.
Establish an emergency fund or make arrangements with family
or friends to assist you in case you run out of money while abroad or need to
return home unexpectedly.
Take into account all duties, fees and taxes you’ll pay on
retirement income or other revenue. Non-residents of Canada are taxed on income
received from sources in Canada and may also be subject to taxation in their
host country.
Keep in mind not only the cost of travelling to your host
country but also the cost of returning to Canada, possibly on a regular basis.
Many countries require foreign visitors to have a valid return ticket with a
departure date within the time limits allowed by immigration authorities. If
you have to make an unplanned trip home, be prepared to pay much more than the
average economy airfare.
See Manage your
money for tips on banking, budgeting and other financial issues
while living abroad.
While living abroad
Stay safe
No matter how secure you may feel in your host country, it’s
essential to crime-proof yourself:
Stay alert and aware of your surroundings. Minimize alcohol
consumption and don’t use, carry or get involved with illegal drugs.
Always pack your own luggage and never let it out of your
sight. Never carry another person’s luggage or transport anything – even
an envelope – across a border or through customs for anyone else. Conceal
in a money belt or neck pouch necessities that can’t be easily replaced: your
passport, credit and debit cards, cash, airline and train tickets, a copy of
your insurance policy, medical prescriptions and contact information for your
doctor. Keep copies of all important documents in a secure place, in case the
originals are stolen or lost.
Watch out for criminals who target foreigners. They may work
individually or in teams, often posing as good Samaritans or creating
distractions to steal belongings. Be wary of new “friends,” including locals,
fellow foreigners and even Canadians you meet abroad.
Make an effort not to stand out or to give the impression
that you’re lost or vulnerable. Know where you’re going, what you’re doing and
how to find your way back. Always carry the address of your accommodations.
Study a street map before going out. Avoid opening a map in a public area or
keep it hidden under a newspaper. Steer clear of isolated areas.
Avoid displaying expensive-looking cameras, jewellery and
other showy accessories that mark you as a wealthy foreigner.
Use only legal and reputable taxis. Never hire a taxi if the
driver approaches you in an airport arrival area. Such services are usually
illegal and may be unsafe. Ask someone you trust to recommend taxi services and
avoid the risk of hailing an unlicensed cab on the street.
Beware of credit card fraud. Never let your credit card out
of your sight. If you use an ATM, do so during business hours at a location
inside a bank, supermarket or large commercial building. Make note of credit
and debit card numbers so they can be cancelled quickly.
Drugs and travel
Most countries impose severe penalties for the possession of
only a minuscule amount of illegal drugs. Even prescription drugs and syringes
used for legitimate medical purposes come under intense scrutiny and should
have proper accompanying documentation. For more information, consult our Alcohol, drugs and travel page.
A roof over your head
Chances are you’ll need temporary accommodations before you
get settled in your host country. Exercise caution when choosing both
short-term and long-term lodgings:
Make sure you feel comfortable about your accommodations and
their location. Do the doors lock properly? Are there fire alarms and escape
routes? Don’t stay anywhere unless you feel safe.
Avoid lodgings on the ground floor or with easy access from
the outside, such as from a balcony or fire escape.
Understand the risks of staying in low-budget
accommodations, such as youth hostels and dormitories. Never leave valuables or
travel documents behind in your room. Keep them close to you if you sleep in a
dorm. Bear in mind that accepting lodgings from a stranger could be an
invitation to danger.
Even if you choose luxury accommodations, you should always
be vigilant. Ensure that the door of your room is locked, even when you’re
inside. Never open your door to anyone without looking through the peephole,
using a door chain or confirming the visitor’s identity.
Never leave your window open, especially if your lodgings
are on the ground floor or have a balcony.
Did you know…
Some countries require visitors to carry photo
identification, such as a passport or resident card, at all times. Failure to
do so could result in arrest, a fine or other serious consequences.
Health care
If you spend a significant period abroad, you may be more
exposed to health risks than a short-term traveller. You may need to learn how
to shop for and prepare food safely, in addition to ensuring access to safe and
potable water. You’ll also have to arrange for health care for yourself and
accompanying family members.
Health care is a serious issue for Canadian expatriates
because few countries have systems as comprehensive or as inexpensive as
Canada’s. Some countries have comprehensive health-care plans that will cover
you, after a waiting period, if you immigrate. However, most countries don’t
offer such programs.
Many developing countries provide free health care to
citizens and permanent residents. But most Canadians living in these countries
seek private health care, which is usually of a higher quality and involves
shorter wait times. Private medical facilities are reasonably advanced in most
countries and will usually see you immediately for a fee. Faced with these
trade-offs, most Canadians choose the private alternative and make sure they’re
well covered by supplemental or replacement insurance. See Purchase the
best insurance you can afford for more information.
Did you know…
When you arrive in your host country, you should make a
point of locating the nearest reputable clinic or hospital and noting the hours
of operation. Don’t wait for an emergency – it may be too late! Contact
the nearest Canadian embassy or consulate for a list of local doctors and
hospitals.
Keep in mind that it’s best to avoid hospitals and dental
facilities in countries with poor hygiene standards. For country-specific
information, see our Country
travel advice and advisories page.
Culture shock
Most people living abroad experience a period of adaptation
known as culture shock. This form of psychological stress affects even seasoned
expatriates and occurs when familiar cues and patterns are no longer present.
The symptoms may be fleeting or last several months, and
their intensity varies from person to person. Individuals facing mental health
issues, such as anxiety and depression, prior to departure are most at risk.
It’s important to recognize the symptoms of culture shock, which usually follow
a familiar pattern.
During the first phase, often described as the “honeymoon
stage,” most encounters in the new country are perceived as exciting and
positive.
During the second phase, sometimes called the “emptiness
stage,” foreigners typically feel a sense of dislocation and unease. Symptoms
may include:
feelings of anger, frustration and irritability, especially
a loss of one’s sense of humour;
negative feelings about the people and culture of the host
country; and
boredom, fatigue and inability to concentrate or work
effectively.
During the third and final phase, foreigners start to accept
their surroundings and make a compromise between the honeymoon and emptiness
stages.
Cushioning the impact
The best strategy for coping with culture shock is to make a
conscious effort to adjust to your new environment:
Learn the social do’s and don’ts of your host country and
make an effort to meet the locals. Communication will be easier if you know how
to greet people, how to dress and how to behave.
Take time to study the language. It will make life simpler
and show your desire to be part of the community. Start with a few simple
phrases, then gradually expand your vocabulary.
Get involved in some aspect of the local culture, such as
the music or cuisine, or learn a new sport or martial art. You’ll meet new
people and get a greater sense of belonging.
Maintain contact with family and friends back home. Sharing
your experiences and problems can help you adapt to the local environment.
Take care of yourself. Be sure to eat well, exercise and get
enough sleep, and avoid heavy alcohol consumption. If you take medication for a
mental health condition, don’t reduce or discontinue your dosage during this
period.
Take time to travel and explore the country’s sights and
attractions.
Avoid idealizing life back home. Make the most of your stay
and keep an open mind.
Consider getting involved with the Canadian expatriate
community to lessen your sense of isolation.
Manage your money
Managing your finances – from budgeting and banking to
paying taxes and purchasing property – is an integral part of living
abroad. It may be difficult to assess how much money you can spend due to
unforeseen expenses or unfamiliarity with local currency and costs. If you’re
paid in the local currency, you may be vulnerable to inflation and currency fluctuations.
Among the factors that could diminish your income are recessions, stock market
crashes and the devaluation of the currency in which your pension or other
benefits are paid. Ensure that your income is, and remains, enough to live on.
It’s also a good idea to consult a private financial
planner, who can provide advice on such matters as contributing to a Registered
Retirement Savings Plan and the Canada Pension Plan while you’re abroad.
Opening a foreign bank account
You’ll almost certainly want to set up a bank account in
your host country, preferably one that can be fed by funds from a Canadian
account. To do so, you’ll need to go to a local foreign exchange bank with your
passport, residency permit and Canadian banking information (including your
branch and account number). Usually someone who can speak English will be
available to assist you. The process can be complicated and time-consuming, so
ensure that you have an alternative source of funds during this period.
Additional tips on banking abroad
Advise your Canadian bank and credit card company about the
period you’ll be abroad.
Look into the feasibility of transferring money between
accounts in Canada and your host country. Know how much money you’re allowed to
send home. The amount may be strictly regulated by your host country.
Retain all receipts, transaction records and documentation
on financial transfers.
Exchange money using only authorized agents to avoid
violating local laws.
Have a variety of ways of accessing your money overseas, such
as credit cards, debit cards and cash.
Receiving a public pension abroad
Canada
Pension Plan (CPP), Quebec
Pension Plan (QPP) and Old Age
Security (OAS) benefits may be paid to you while living abroad,
subject to certain conditions.
CPP and QPP benefits are paid outside Canada, as long as all
conditions of eligibility are met. OAS is paid outside Canada if the pensioner
lived in Canada for at least 20 years after age 18. The OAS system is intended
to guarantee a minimum income to seniors. Eligibility is determined by an
income test. To receive OAS benefits outside Canada, you’re generally required
to file an annual tax return reporting your worldwide income. For details, see
the Canada
Benefits website.
Online banking
Most financial institutions allow you to access your account
to check balances, pay bills and transfer funds anywhere in the world. It’s not
advisable to conduct transactions in cybercafés or other areas where Internet
service is available to the public, as it’s difficult to ensure that computers
are free of hacking programs that can capture personal and account information.
If you must complete transactions on a public computer, be sure to erase all
traces afterwards by clearing the Internet browser’s cache.
Taxation
Your tax obligations while living abroad depend largely on
whether you’re a resident or non-resident of Canada. Your status is determined
by a number of factors, including the purpose and permanence of your stay
abroad, the duration and frequency of your visits to Canada and whether you’ve
severed your residential ties with Canada. Be sure to review your situation
with the Canada
Revenue Agency (CRA) to avoid surprises.
For information to determine your residency status, see
CRA's "Individuals -
leaving or entering Canada and non-residents". Once you've
confirmed your residency status, you can find information specific to your
situation as a Canadian living abroad, such as the tax package you should use;
your eligibility for the Foreign Tax Credit and Overseas Employment Tax Credit;
your entitlement to other credits and benefits as a Canadian living abroad; and
details on tax treaties between Canada and certain countries, which will allow
you to avoid being taxed in two countries on the same income.
The CRA’s International Tax Services Office processes income
tax returns for non-residents and deemed residents of Canada, including
Canadians working abroad. It also provides assistance by telephone and postal
correspondence and looks after all non-resident tax withholding accounts.
See our Taxation for Canadians
Travelling, Living or Working Outside Canada page for more
information.
Did you know…?
As a rule, you cannot receive welfare, disability or other
forms of social assistance while living abroad. Contact your provincial or
territorial authorities for details.
Legal matters
While abroad, you’re subject to the laws and regulations of
your host country. Your Canadian citizenship offers no immunity. When in doubt,
seek professional legal advice. The nearest Canadian embassy or consulate can
provide you with a list of English-speaking lawyers who may be able to assist
you.
Did you know…?
If a child custody dispute arises while you’re abroad, you
can contact Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada through our Emergency
Watch and Response Centre. Visit our Request
emergency assistance page for contact information.
Marriage and divorce
Laws and procedures regarding marriage and divorce vary
widely from country to country, often resulting in unexpected complications.
If you plan to marry while living abroad, understand that
some countries enforce tight restrictions on a woman’s right to seek property
entitlement, inheritance, divorce, alimony and child custody. A husband may be
entitled to impose strict controls on his wife and children, preventing their
return to Canada without his permission.
Make sure you understand the laws and conventions of your
host country regarding relationships and marriage, as well as their
implications for children. In case of separation or divorce, investigate the
rules concerning child custody and property settlement. If your spouse is a
citizen of your host country, he or she may have more rights than you do as a
foreigner. You could also be at a disadvantage if the country has a tradition
of deciding child custody cases on the basis of gender or religious belief.
Contact a legal representative or the appropriate authorities of your host
country for more information.
Find out if a marriage or divorce performed in your host
country will be legally recognized upon your return to Canada by consulting
with the vital statistics office of the province or territory where you will
live.
If your future spouse is not Canadian, confirm if he or she
will be eligible to return to Canada with you on a temporary or permanent basis
by contacting the nearest Citizenship and Immigration Canada office abroad.
For additional details, see our Marriage overseas page.
Did you know…?
While same-sex marriages are legal in Canada, they aren’t
recognized in many countries. Same-sex civil unions are more widely recognized
abroad. Canadians attempting to visit a foreign country as a same-sex married
couple may be refused entry by border officials. Moreover, homosexual activity
is a criminal offence in certain countries and could result in severe
punishment, including imprisonment or the death penalty. For country-specific
information, consult our Country travel
advice and advisories page or your host country’s embassy or
consulate in Canada.
Buying property
Purchasing property in another country is a major decision.
The laws and customs pertaining to real estate can be very different abroad
than at home, resulting in unforeseen risks and problems with ownership rights.
For example, in Mexico, foreigners require a special permit to purchase land
and can only buy property in coastal and border zones through a bank trust.
Did you know…?
Not all countries regulate lawyers and real estate agents as
scrupulously as Canada does. For example, rules governing conflict of interest
by lawyers can be lax in many parts of the world. Real estate agents in Latin
America and the Caribbean generally require no qualifications and aren’t
prevented from promoting sales in which they have an undisclosed interest.
Furthermore, local authorities may disregard complaints from foreign residents
about crooked dealings, especially if the lawyer or agent concerned is an
established member of the community.
Proceed with caution if you plan to buy property. It’s
usually best to rent for a while before committing to purchase a home. Research
local property laws and investigate all aspects of the purchase, including such
claims as “beach access,” which may be false. Consult our Country travel advice and advisories page to
find out if problems, such as real estate fraud, are widespread in your host
country.
Hire a legal representative with expertise in local real
estate law, who only represents you and is independent of anyone else involved
in the transaction (e.g., a real estate agent or vendor). If possible, appoint
a Canadian lawyer with expertise in the laws of your host country. Never sign
anything that hasn’t been carefully reviewed by your lawyer. If things go
wrong, remember that property disputes are private legal matters that can only
be resolved through local courts. The Government of Canada cannot intervene.
Make a will to avoid creating problems for heirs to your
property or other assets you hold abroad.
Bribery?
Canada’s Corruption of
Foreign Public Officials Act prohibits Canadian citizens or
businesses from bribing foreign public officials to obtain or retain a business
advantage. A Canadian who gives or offers a loan, reward, advantage or any
other benefit to a foreign public official (or another person on behalf of an
official) can be prosecuted in a Canadian or foreign court. Violation of the
act is a criminal offence, punishable by imprisonment for up to five years.
Immigration and citizenship
You may wish to seek permanent residency, citizenship status
or both, depending on the immigration regulations of the country you live in.
Either involves establishing legal status beyond that of a short-term visitor.
Be aware of the implications, including the likelihood of being prevented from
obtaining Canadian consular assistance in your host country. For more information,
see Dual
citizenship – blessing or burden?, or consult our publication Dual citizenship:
what you need to know.
Regulations for immigrants
Immigration regulations vary enormously from country to
country, but are usually based on three principles: employment, investment and
family connections. Some countries accept individuals with adequate guaranteed
income – including pension benefits – as potential immigrants. For
example, Mexico classifies an eligible retiree or other permanent resident as
an inmigrante rentista, or long-term immigrant. However, the United States
doesn’t recognize retirement as a reason for establishing permanent residency.
Many countries require you to apply to immigrate before you
arrive. Others will allow you to enter as a tourist and apply for immigration
later. Contact the immigration authorities of your destination country for
details.
Regulations for temporary visitors
Seasonal retirees, volunteers, students and other Canadians
who reside abroad for less than six months each year can visit many countries
as tourists. A valid passport is often the only entry requirement.
However, some countries impose tight restrictions on the
length of time temporary visitors can stay. For example, Costa Rica limits
tourists to a maximum stay of 90 days. Students must obtain an appropriate visa
from Costa Rican immigration authorities and provide confirmation of enrolment
in an accredited institution.
Think twice about settling in a country where you can only
enter as a tourist, especially if you’re planning to purchase a home. Instead,
you may wish to apply for legal residency, which removes restrictions on the
length of your stay and gives reasonable assurance that you’ll be able to
re-enter the country at any time. Taking out legal residency in another country
doesn’t prevent you from maintaining Canadian residency.
Canadian birthright
Canadian parents are not required to register the birth of a
child abroad. Even so, you may wish to get proof of your baby’s citizenship, as
it will be needed to obtain a Canadian passport. Contact the nearest Canadian
embassy or consulate abroad to apply for a Certificate of Canadian Citizenship
as well as a passport for your child. Start the process early, as it may take a
while. For more information, see Citizenship
and Immigration Canada’s website.
Driving
Traffic accidents are the leading cause of injury and death
among international travellers. Take special precautions when driving abroad:
Find out if you’re required by local laws to hold an
International Driving Permit (IDP). Available through the Canadian Automobile Association, the IDP is
proof that you hold a valid driver’s licence in Canada. Keep in mind that the
IDP is valid for only one year from the date of issue or until your Canadian
licence expires, whichever comes first. Remember to safeguard your Canadian
licence and renew it before the expiry date, as it may be difficult to replace
from abroad. Note that some countries require foreign drivers to obtain a local
licence after a specified period.
Confirm that you’re insured to drive abroad and have
comprehensive coverage for loss or damage, liability, collision, medical
expenses resulting from an accident and other risks.
Educate yourself on local traffic laws and comply with speed
limits, legal alcohol levels, road safety procedures and mechanical
requirements.
Drive defensively. Motorist habits and road conditions vary
markedly from country to country. Carefully plan road trips in advance and know
where you’re going at all times. Always lock the doors to prevent carjackers
and thieves from getting in with you.
If you operate a vehicle imported from Canada, ensure that
it’s equipped for local driving – for example, headlight converters for
left-hand driving, an approved emergency breakdown kit, an oval sticker on the
rear indicating “CDN” (the licence plate country code for Canada).
Before buying an automobile abroad, confirm if you’re
allowed to bring it home. For details, see the Canada Border Services Agency
publication Importing a
Vehicle into Canada.
Consular services
Canadian consular officials are ready to assist you at
embassies and consulates around the world.
We can:
Arrange help in a medical emergency by providing you with a
list of local doctors and hospitals.
Help coordinate a medical evacuation if a necessary
treatment is not available locally (fees apply).
Provide advice and contact information on local police and
medical services to victims of robbery, sexual assault or other violence.
Supply you with a list of local lawyers.
Provide you with sources of information about local laws and
regulations.
Seek to ensure you’re treated fairly under the country’s
laws if you’re arrested or detained.
Replace a lost, stolen, damaged or expired passport (fees
apply).
Contact relatives or friends to request assistance in
sending you money or airline tickets.
Contact next of kin, with your authorization, if you have an
accident or are detained by police.
Provide advice about burying a Canadian abroad or assist in
repatriating the remains to Canada (fees apply).
However, we cannot:
Intervene in private legal matters.
Investigate a crime or death.
Ask local authorities to give you preferential treatment.
Make travel arrangements.
Assist with job hunting.
Help you find accommodations.
A complete list of services we can and cannot provide is
available on our Consular
services page. See our Embassies and
consulates page for a list of Canadian embassies and consulates
worldwide.
Have an emergency plan
When living abroad, it’s essential for you and your loved
ones to have an emergency plan. It will help you:
know what to do in case of a major crisis, such as a natural
disaster or civil unrest;
identify escape routes from your home and workplace and a
safe meeting place to reunite; and
build a 72-hour emergency kit, including food, water, a
flashlight and other essentials.
For more information on creating an emergency plan, visit
the Government of Canada website Get Prepared.
Death abroad
If a Canadian relative or friend dies abroad, you should
contact the nearest Canadian embassy or consulate or our Emergency Watch and
Response Centre immediately. Consular officials can assist you in making the
necessary arrangements to:
register the death with local and Canadian provincial or
territorial authorities;
obtain documentation, including a death certificate, autopsy
report or police report;
acquire information on the circumstances surrounding the
death; and
return the remains of your loved one to Canada.
Fees may apply. For more information, see our Consular services page.
Did you know…?
Emergency consular assistance is available 24 hours a day,
seven days a week. See “In case of an
emergency…” for more information.
Voting
Eligible Canadians can vote in federal elections while
temporarily living abroad. To vote by special mail-in ballot, you must first
send an Application for Registration and Special Ballot form to Elections
Canada. At the call of an election, you’ll receive a voting kit with
instructions. For further details, see our Elections
(voting from abroad) page.
Keep connected
Despite the enchantment of living abroad, you may find that
you depend more than ever on contact with Canada. Sharing your experiences and
problems with family and friends and receiving news from home can have a
stabilizing influence while you’re getting accustomed to being a foreigner in a
faraway land. Having a strong support network in Canada will also make your
eventual homecoming easier.
Keep your contacts in Canada informed of your whereabouts
and any changes in your plans. Canadian consular officials receive countless
calls from distraught friends and family who haven’t heard from loved ones
abroad. Don’t expect communications to be as advanced in every corner of the
world as in Canada.
Did you know…?
Telephone: Telecommunications services in many countries are
unreliable and more expensive than in Canada. You may be unable to get a land
line immediately. Waiting times in some countries can run into months, and
large cash deposits may be required, especially from foreigners. A cell phone
is often a better bet than a land line in countries with mobile services.
Internet: Web access is widely available worldwide but is
limited by each country’s infrastructure and networking technologies. Private
Internet connections may be difficult to obtain. Don’t expect the same
high-speed access in developing nations as you would in Canada.
Television and radio: Canadian television broadcasts are
available worldwide via Internet and satellite. Tune in to Radio Canada
International at rcinet.ca for online programming about Canada.
Mail: Postal services tend to be slow and undependable in
developing countries. It may be more practical to have your mail sent to a
forwarding service in Canada, then periodically couriered to you.
Canadian expatriate community: Plugging into the expat
network can soften your sense of culture shock and give you vital support while
you’re settling into your new environment and seeking connections.
Travel information: Get the latest information through
our Country
travel advice and advisories, Latest news and warnings, Travel updates, RSS feeds or by connecting with us through
Twitter, Facebook or Foursquare.
Coming back to Canada
Planning for your return
Expect to face a period of readjustment when returning to
Canada. You may experience a reverse form of culture shock, including feelings
of anxiety, groundlessness and even depression. A little planning can go a long
way to facilitate your homecoming.
Departure clearance and tax
It’s important to settle any obligations before leaving your
host country. Make sure you’ve paid your local bills or made arrangements to do
so. If you’ve obtained citizenship, permanent residency or any other form of
legal status in the country, you may need departure clearance to leave.
Approval usually depends on the satisfactory inspection of travel documents,
permits or other official forms. For example, some countries ask for a
statement from local tax authorities that you’ve met all obligations. Others
will terminate your residency permit if you’re leaving for good or for an
extended period.
Be prepared to pay a departure tax in the local currency
when you leave. Other countries you pass through en route to Canada may also
charge fees.
Importing pets
When returning to Canada with a dog or cat, you’ll have to
present a certificate stating that the animal has been vaccinated for rabies.
Other pets may require an import permit. For more information, see our Travelling
with animals page.
Bringing it home
Depending on how long you’ve lived abroad, you may be
subject to import provisions for personal belongings and household goods upon
your return to Canada. Declare all items acquired abroad, whether they’re intended
for you or as gifts. Keep original receipts for possible inspection.
There are no restrictions on how much money you can bring
into Canada, but you must report a sum of $10,000 or more to a customs officer.
For more information on what you can bring home, see our Customs page.
Did you know...?
If you become sick or feel unwell after returning to Canada,
you should see your doctor immediately. Remember to mention that you’ve been
living abroad, what countries you’ve visited, if you were ill while outside
Canada and what medical treatment you received.
Illegal souvenirs
There are restrictions on bringing certain goods into
Canada. If you’re thinking of importing meat, eggs, dairy products, fresh fruits
or vegetables, plants, animals or items made from their feathers or skins,
contact the Canada Border Services Agency beforehand for guidance. For accurate
and timely information on import requirements, see our Customs page.
Many items brought illegally into Canada, such as elephant
ivory, coral jewellery and sea turtle shells, are made from endangered animals
and plants. They’re among the 34,000 species regulated under the Convention on
International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). A
violation of CITES could lead to seizure of your purchase, as well as a fine
and/or prison term. Consult Environment
Canada’s CITES website for details.
Also, be aware that it may be illegal to bring home cultural
property, such as antiques and fossils, whose export is banned or controlled by
your host country. Strict penalties may be imposed, and cultural property may
be confiscated and returned to the country of origin. For more information,
consult with your host country’s border authorities or Canadian Heritage.
Did you know…?
It’s illegal to bring obscene materials, child pornography
or hate propaganda of any kind into Canada.
Products banned in Canada due to safety hazards are listed
on Health
Canada’s website.
Information on importing weapons is available on the Canadian Firearms Program website.
Social insurance number
If you’ve live abroad for an extended period and haven’t
filed a tax return in Canada for at least five years, your social insurance
number (SIN) may be deactivated. To have it reactivated, you’ll need to provide
proof of identity and an acceptable explanation for the period of inactivity.
For more information, consult the Service
Canada website, visit the nearest Service Canada office or call
1-800-206-7218 (in Canada) or 506-548-7961(from abroad).
Provincial/territorial health insurance
Your provincial or territorial health plan will become
invalid if you’ve been abroad beyond a certain length of time, typically six
months. There could be a requalification period before your coverage is
reinstated. This period may be covered by any replacement insurance you
purchased while abroad. If not, health insurance plans are available for
temporary visitors to Canada, usually purchased upon arrival.
Be sure to apply for reinstatement of your
provincial/territorial health plan upon your return to Canada. For more
information or to find out what conditions apply to you, contact your regional
healthcare authority. For links to the official government websites of Canada’s
provinces and territories, visit the Moving back to Canada page.
Living abroad checklist
Remember to take these important steps before leaving
Canada:
Assess your readiness to live abroad by weighing the rewards
and risks of adapting to another language, pace of life, laws and customs,
climate and security conditions.
Confirm the legitimacy of work, study, volunteer, retirement
or other opportunities abroad.
Consult our Country
travel advice and advisories and the publication Bon voyage,
but… essential information for Canadian travellers.
Ensure you can afford to move abroad by calculating the
costs (e.g., transportation, shipping household effects, settling into a new
home, the cost of living).
Plan for long-term health needs by obtaining a pre-departure
health assessment, vaccinations, prescriptions, medical supplies, extra
eyeglasses, supplemental or replacement insurance.
Check whether dual citizenship could cause complications for
you in your host country.
Obtain all required travel documentation (e.g., passports,
visas, medical certificates, criminal record checks). Leave copies of your
documents and insurance policy with friends or family in Canada.
If you’re moving abroad with children, carry a consent
letter proving they have permission to travel from every non-accompanying
person with the legal right to make major decisions on their behalf; check with
your host country’s immigration authorities regarding additional entry
requirements; arrange for appropriate daycare or schooling.
Sign up for the Registration
of Canadians Abroad service so that we can contact and assist you in
case of an emergency.
Feedback
Your views are important to us and will help us continue to
offer world-class consular services. To share your comments, please fill out
our Client feedback form.
Publication Information
Published by Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development
Canada.
Information in this publication is readily available for
personal and public non-commercial use and may be reproduced, in part or in
whole and by any means, without charge or further permission from Foreign
Affairs, Trade and Development Canada. We ask only that:
Users exercise due diligence in ensuring the accuracy of the
materials reproduced;
Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada be
identified as the source department; and
the reproduction not be represented as an official version
of the materials reproduced, nor as having been made in affiliation with or
with the endorsement of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada.
All information in this publication is provided on an “as
is” basis without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Foreign
Affairs, Trade and Development Canada makes all reasonable efforts to
ensure that the information contained in this publication is accurate. The
reader is also encouraged to supplement this information with independent
research and professional advice.
This publication is available in alternative formats upon
request.
To obtain more information or free copies of this
publication, write to:
Enquiries Service
Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada
125 Sussex Drive Ottawa, ON K1A 0G2
Tel.: 1-800-267-8376 (in Canada) or 613-944-4000
E-mail: enqserv@international.gc.ca
Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada
125 Sussex Drive Ottawa, ON K1A 0G2
Tel.: 1-800-267-8376 (in Canada) or 613-944-4000
E-mail: enqserv@international.gc.ca
We would like to receive your comments on this publication.
Write to us at the address above or e-mail us attravel@international.gc.ca.
-----------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.