BLOGGED SOCHI
WINTER OLYMPICS/PARALYMPICS 2014- MOTHER RUSSIA
SOCHI OLYMPICS/PARALYMPICS- Dec31-Jan 2014 -WE REMEMBER BOSTON- All Nation countries band 2gether 2 BRING THE BEST OF THEIR BOMB DOGS AND HUNTERS- who are the world's best at catching the coward Heretic Muslim Monsters- - The Winter Olympics/Paralympics of Sochi, Mother Russia are 4 the global children of this world 2 honour the best of the best of all that is good about our world class athletes.... All nations stepping up.... 4 Sochi.... r kids matter
http://nova0000scotia.blogspot.ca/2013/12/sochi-olympicsparalympics-dec31-jan.html
------
BLOGGED:
CANADA
MILITARY NEWS: SOCHI- Dec 10 -we are told 2 get with the fact- it's about
global team spirit of global athletes who have worked 4 years 2 compete with
world's best - NOT POLITICS OR INTERVENTIONS- Canada loves lost in beautiful
translations... SOCHI, SOCHI, SOCHI- won't apologize 4 Ukraine love but will
focus on Athletes- which had been doing mostly.... this is such an exciting
time... especially 4 the old Canadians who may NOT get 2 watch another Winter
Olympics/Paralympics- updates
-------------------
USA: The
Creator & Sustainer of Chechen Terrorism
Boston
Terror: Don’t Let the Media Fool You … Again- Climb Up the Chain and Meet the
Real Masterminds of Global Terror.
Here we go again- Déjà vu. Out of the
blue we have a ‘terror event,’ a couple of pop-terrorists, and a new buzz-word
nation-Chechnya. There they go again: USA Media tales made-in-government:
Muslims, terrorists, fanatics, freedom-haters … this time from another
exotic-sounding land-Chechnya.
They
are going to tell you about the new frontiers in the so-called Islamic Terror
Cells: The Caucasus and Central Asia. They’ve been planning this for a long
time. In fact, the plans were in motion as early as the mid-1990s. Since 2002,
despite the gag orders and attacks, I have been talking about: Central Asia
& the Caucasus. I have been talking about our operations-grooming our very
own terrorists in that region. I have been talking about Chechnya. In fact,
just recently, I talked and talked about it on record:
Sibel
Edmonds on Operation Gladio:
The government and its media will
give you the tales. They will give you the roller-coaster-like spins. They will
not give you what you need to know. Two years ago, we, at Boiling Frogs Post,
provided you with the followingarticle-analysis.
Please read it: with the recent home-made terror incident and the new media
buzz-word ‘Chechnya’, you need to arm yourself with facts.
Here are a few excerpts from my
article on US-Chechen Joint Terror
Operation published
in November 2011:
The US media may be many awful things,
but no one could ever accuse them of not being consistent- at least when it
comes to certain subject areas; US-NATO-Chechen joint terrorism
operations being
one. The censorship of this topic goes to such extremes – where even
modified-sanitized-pasteurized versions of related events and facts are nowhere
to be found in the US media. Let me list a few globally known and reported
facts, then add a few twos and twos and twos together, and see whether you can
find any traces of that in the US mainstream media:
Assassinations
of Chechen Terrorist Leaders in Turkey
The following was reported by
British paper Telegraph in September this year: Kremlin hit squad ‘assassinate Chechen Islamist in Istanbul’
The
triple murder was carried out by a lone gunman in less than thirty seconds
using a 9mm pistol fitted with a silencer. It brought the number of Chechens
assassinated in the Turkish city in the last four years to at least six. The
gunman pumped eleven bullets into the three men in a busy Istanbul street
before speeding off in a black getaway car.
One
of the murdered men, 33-year-old Berg-Haj Musayev, was said to be close to Doku
Umarov, an Islamist terrorist leader who is Russia’s most wanted man. The other
two were said to be his bodyguards.
It
was Umarov who claimed responsibility for the January suicide bombing of
Moscow’s busy Domodedovo airport, an atrocity that left 37 people dead.
Musayev’s widow Sehida said she was sure the Russian secret service was behind
her husband’s murder, a view echoed by Murat Ozer, head of a Chechen Diaspora
group in Istanbul.
I am going to provide you with
several cases like this, and go back several years, but for now keep this
article in mind, and ask yourself: How did these notorious Chechen
terrorist masterminds and leaders end up in Turkey? Why did all these
high-level terrorists choose Turkey? How could they be allowed by the Turkish
government to operate and carry out their terror operations from Turkey as
their HQ-base?
Keep those questions in mind as you
proceed to the next case and facts. Now, a bit more on these assassinations
from Spiegel:
Russian
intelligence agents appear to be systematically working off a hit list. When he
came into power, Putin, who was president at the time, apparently decided to
expand the death zone. “We will pursue the terrorists wherever they go. If we
find them in the toilet, we’ll kill them in the outhouse,” the president vowed,
and set his agents loose on Chechen rebels and terrorists abroad.
In
February 2004, Russian agents with diplomatic passports blew up an SUV carrying
Zelimkhan Yandarbiyev, a Chechen rebel commander, in Qatar, where he had been a guest of that country’s emir…
The
attacks were carried out in Arab countries, Azerbaidjan in the southern Caucasus and, in particular, Turkey. In September 2008, the Chechen
militant Gaji Edilsultanov was murdered in Istanbul in broad daylight.
Three months later, his fellow militant Islam Zhanibekov was killed in an
execution-style shooting in front of his wife and children. Russian
special-forces units had targeted the Chechen because of his involvement in several
terrorist attacks.
What
I want you to specifically take with you from this second article is that: 1-
The largest concentrations of these active Chechen terrorists are in (in
order): Turkey- A NATO member, Azerbaijan (Almost a NATO Member), Germany (a
NATO Member), followed by Dubai- one of the closest US Allies in the Arab
States, and Qatar-another very close US ally and partner in the Arab states. 2-
Amazingly these notorious ‘Islamist’ terrorists are not present in ‘Islamist’
nations designated as terrorist nations by the United States: Iran, Syria. Of
course there are no Chechen terrorist groups in North Korea. Please keep this
‘2’ together with the previous one, and we’ll move to the next area.
Chechen
Terrorists Linked Closely with Turkey
Do you remember the Moscow Theater
hostage Crisis in 2002? If not, you can quickly check it out here.
The following report came out after
the investigations and follow up:
There
were earlier reports that Chechen terrorists had made telephone calls to Turkey, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates during the hostage drama.
According
to reports carried by the Itar-Tass on Tuesday, Russian security intelligence
said that they had had indisputable proof that the Chechens had received
support and encouragement from these three countries.
The
head of Russia’s International Military Co-operation Department, General
Anatoli Mazurkeviç, is to meet with a European Parliamentarian Council
delegation later on Tuesday and complain of what Russia sees as a double
standard in west on combating terrorism.
I am sure you have
picked up on the commonality shared by the mentioned nations. The time frame:
2002, and the terrorist and terrorist supporting nations happen to be those
outside our nation’s designated axis of evil. No Iraq, Iran or Syria. No
Gaddafi-led Libya.
Let’s pause for a second and check
out the Chechens’ American friends and advocates, and after that we’ll come
back here. The following article appeared
in the Guardian UK in 2004:
In
the US, the leading group which pleads the Chechen cause is the American
Committee for Peace in Chechnya (ACPC). The list of the self-styled
“distinguished Americans” who are its members is a roll call of the most
prominent neoconservatives who so enthusiastically support the “war on terror”.
They
include Richard Perle, the notorious Pentagon adviser; Elliott Abrams of Iran-Contra fame; Kenneth Adelman, the former US ambassador to the UN
who egged on the invasion of Iraq by predicting it would be “a cakewalk”; Midge Decter, biographer of Donald Rumsfeld and a
director of the rightwing Heritage Foundation;Frank Gaffney of the militarist Centre for Security Policy; Bruce Jackson, former US military intelligence
officer and one-time vice-president of Lockheed Martin, now president of the US
Committee on NATO;Michael Ladeen of the American Enterprise Institute, a former
admirer of Italian fascism and now a leading proponent of regime change in
Iran; and R James Woolsey, the former CIA director who is one of the leading cheerleaders behind
George Bush’s plans to re-model the Muslim world along pro-US lines.
In
August, the ACPC welcomed the award of political asylum in the US, and a
US-government funded grant, to Ilyas Akhmadov, foreign minister in the
opposition Chechen government, and a man Moscow describes as a terrorist.
Coming from both political parties, the ACPC members represent the backbone of
the US foreign policy establishment, and their views are indeed those of the US
administration.
Okay. You should
have several twos by now to add together later: Main Chechen terror base and HQ
in NATO Member and one of the closest US allies in the Middle East Turkey +
Network Extension in Germany (NATO), Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates
(Two closest US Arab Allies and Pawns) + All the major PNAC –Neoconservative
& the New World Order players and operators + the CIA.
Now, let’s head back where we left
off with the Russia-Turkey angle, and take a look at a more specific player.
Here is an article from 2008:
Related:
- Tamerlan Tsarnaev Was Radicalized by the CIA
- Boston Terror Update 2: The Syria Objective is Nearly Accomplished?
- CIA MO Not the FBI, Contradictions from Dagestan, Recent Shooting Incident in Dagestan, Georgia-NATO-Russia & More
- Sibel Edmonds on the Boston Bombing
- Salafism And The CIA: A Winning Formula To Destabilize Africa, The Middle East And Russia
- The Chechens’ American friends
- Jürgen Elsässer: “The CIA recruited and trained the jihadists”
- Ground Zero Al Qaeda Training Camp in the USA (Explore all the links!)
- The Politics of Terrorism in North Ossetia
- West Point Document: “Libyan Rebels” Are The Same Terrorists Who Killed US Troops In Iraq
- Dagestan—‘Syria comes to Russia’
- Chechen Uprising Was Provoked by CIA
- Oil and British And American Covert Operations in Chechnya
- Russians Blast US-UK Sponsorship Of Chechen Terror
- Libya: Torture, Murder, Terror, the Deep State and Gladio
Share this:
·
Share
·
April 20, 2013 in AFRICA, AL-QAEDA, CIA, GLADIO, GWOT, MIDDLE EAST, NATO, RUSSIA, SECRET STATE,TERRORISM, USA, WORLD.
Related posts
Post navigation
13
thoughts on “USA: The Creator & Sustainer of
Chechen Terrorism”
Click on the Ultimate Jihad Challenge
and scroll down to the Chechnya flame image and click.
http://web.archive.org/web/20010516224304/http://www.sakina.fsbusiness.co.uk/
http://web.archive.org/web/20010516224304/http://www.sakina.fsbusiness.co.uk/
If you click on links in the header
in the page that opens, you get more details.
Chechnya Links – National Endowment
for Democracy
http://www.ned.org/search_results.html?cx=008846551274917761505%3A1i0zdvf5gsi&cof=FORID%3A11&q=+chechnya&sa.x=16&sa.y=14
http://www.ned.org/search_results.html?cx=008846551274917761505%3A1i0zdvf5gsi&cof=FORID%3A11&q=+chechnya&sa.x=16&sa.y=14
o Mudiwa
AK and his many aliases can’t argue
ignorance when he ran this website for years. The only people connected to the
operation that weren’t assassinated were the MI6 and CIA trainers and AK.
Suspicious ya think?
mathaba.net promote the propaganda
that Libya was behind terrorism and not just terrorism, but al qaeda terrorism
when Libya and Muammar Gaddafi were the most ardent opponents of al qaeda and
took extreme measures to thwart them.
“SAKINA PERSONNEL ARE UNIQUE IN THE
FIELD OF SURVIVAL BECAUSE OF THEIR VAST EXPERIENCE IN THE ELITE SPECIAL FORCES
OF THE WORLD – i.e. LIBYAN SPECIAL FORCES”
o Warrior Rising
mathaba.net posted a slew of articles
consistently aligned with CIA propaganda against Russia and Putin. When I
traced one link, “Save Chechnya Film Campaign” I found related
sites sponsored by Soros and the Jamestown Foundation.
http://savechechnya.org/
http://chechen.org/2013/04/19/tsarnaev-brothers-overt-links-to-jihadism-remain-shaky/
http://www.waynakh.com/eng/2009/07/each-chechen-must-become-a-part-of-the-resistance/
http://www.radiomarsho.com/
http://chechen.org/2013/04/19/tsarnaev-brothers-overt-links-to-jihadism-remain-shaky/
http://www.waynakh.com/eng/2009/07/each-chechen-must-become-a-part-of-the-resistance/
http://www.radiomarsho.com/
There’s
this example from a US newspaper they posted painting Russians as monsters “Russian
counterstrike: families held hostage in Chechnya” and from WaPo
attacking Putin, “Chechnya can and must be mended” which accuses
Russia of setting up the exact same scenario NED uses in every country where it
staged color revolutions, written by the chairman of the CIA’s Central
Asia-Caucasus Institute at Johns Hopkins University;
“Russian President Vladimir Putin
declares that the only acceptable outcome is the one he seeks to effect through
a puppet government imposed on the dissident republic through rigged
elections.”
Then from the
Guardian, UK, mathaba.net posted, “Russia puts price
on Chechen rebels’ heads“. It refers to massive protests
against Russian “terrorists” without noting that the protests were staged by
USAID – NED agitators.
This should have tipped activists off
to the true nature of mathaba.net a decade ago, long before the war against
Libya.
This article from mainstream media
confirms that Chechen al qaeda were fighting against the former government in
Libya.
“They have been in Libya. From there
they are even believed to move into the disturbed sub-Sahara, the Sahel,
stretching from Somalia through to Mali and beyond. They are among the most
active and now militarily-accomplished of the new breed of guerrilla and
terrorist. They are sure to be among the hard men now battling to overthrow
Syria’s President Assad, as Chechens have operated in this part of the world
ever since they were expelled during the last years of Tsarist Russia — many
thousands going to what is now Jordan, forming a significant part of the
governing intelligentsia.”
This article goes into detail about
the West’s connivance with al qaeda in Chechnya to destabilize Russia.
With the latest developments
regarding the suspects identified in the Boston Bombing, reports of the alleged
perpetrators’ Chechen heritage are being used by the whole of the mainstream
media to draw connections between the bombing and Islamic terrorism. Even
despite the desire of mainstream magazines
like Salon for
the bomber(s) to have been white Americans, the narrative being paraded in
front of the American collective is currently satisfied with the meme of the
Chechen Muslim fundamentalist.
Indeed, in a recent report by FOX
News, entitled “Ties Between Islamic Extremist
Groups and Chechnya Well-Documented,” the organization states,
Reports that the suspects in the
Boston bombing are believed to be from the region near Chechnya may have caught
some by surprise — rebels in Chechnya are known for their violent and
long-running campaign to break away from Russia, but not for exporting terror
to America.
But congressional researchers and
foreign policy analysts have long tracked a connection between the Chechnya
region and Islamic extremists with Al Qaeda and the Taliban. If the suspects
are indeed Chechen, analysts told Fox News they may represent part of a jihadi
network which has made its way to American soil.
The report also clearly states that
“The ties between major Islamic extremist groups and Chechnya are
well-documented, particularly pertaining to extremists’ support for the separatists
in Chechnya.”
Likewise, it was stated by Michael
Wines of the New York Times, in an article published as far back as December 9,
2001, entitled “War on Terror Casts Chechen
Conflict in New Light,” that “Chechnya’s guerrillas are indisputably
financed by a web of Islamic charities, banks and other organizations that have
served as cash conduits for terrorist groups.”
Wines also writes,
On one hand, the Wahhabi takeover
here, like much of the Chechen war, was clearly propelled by outside support.
Residents say the Wahhabis also had ties to a notorious training camp that
indoctrinated Chechens and foreigners alike in Islamic militancy and military
tactics.
There are strong indications that the
camp and its leader, a guerrilla from the Middle East known as Khattab, have
ties to Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda.
Yet, although the narrative promoted
by both FOX News and The New York Times, as well as the vast majority of the
other mainstream media outlets revolves around the traditional notion of crafty
Arab Muslims hiding in caves and successfully plotting to outsmart one of the
most sophisticated police states in the world, as is almost always the case,
these outlets are fundamentally missing the most important piece of the puzzle.
Interestingly
enough, this missing puzzle piece was hinted at in 2001 by Michael Wines where
he mentions that “the Wahhabi takeover” in Chechnya, “like much of the Chechen
war, was clearly propelled by outside support.”
But what forces are propelling this
continued conflict?
Wines and other mainstream commentators
may, of course, suggest that the terrorists are “financed by a web of Islamic
charities, banks and other organizations that have served as cash conduits for
terrorist groups.”
However, the true source of funding,
training, and arming may prove to be more difficult to fit in to the
traditional mainstream narrative surrounding Islamic fundamentalist terrorism.
Chechen “rebels,”
much like their “rebel” cousins in Syria, are, in
fact, receiving training, weapons, and financial support via the very networks
that so vociferously claim to oppose them – the United States and British
governments.
Indeed,
in order to see the direct connection between the U.S. government and Chechen
terrorism, one need only look toward the leader of the “Chechen rebels,” the
Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Chechen Republic-Ichkeria, Ilyas Akhmadov,
who resides internationally by bouncing back and forth between the United
States and Britain all on the tab of the U.S. State Department ever since 2004.
Being more willing to report on the
treachery of the United States than the American press, the Russian news agency KMNews was
quite willing to pick up on the American bankrolling of foreign terrorists. The
agency wrote,
In early August, . . . Minister of
Foreign Affairs of the Chechen Republic-Ichkeria, Ilyas Akhmadov received
political asylum in the USA. And for his ‘outstanding services,’ Akhmadov
received a Reagan-Fascell grant,” including a monthly
stipend, medical insurance, and well-equipped office with all necessary support
services, including the possibility of meetings with political circles and
leading US media . ..”[1]
KMNews then asked, “What about our
partners in the ‘anti-terrorist’ coalition?”
The agency then went on to cite the
official expressions of support by then-President George W. Bush, Condoleezza
Rice, and State Department spokesman Richard Boucher in order to acknowledge
the seemingly bizarre hypocrisy of these officials as they prosecuted a war OF
terror all across the globe.
KMNews also pointed out that the
generous grant money provided to Akhmadov by the Reagan-Fascell Foundation is
nothing more than a thinly veiled payment to Akhmadov by the U.S. State
Department. This is because the Reagan-Fascell Foundation is actually financed
by the U.S. Congress via the budget of the State Department itself.
KMNews then tellingly explained the
motivation behind the funding and support of Chechen terrorist networks. It
stated,
Thus, the conclusion is obvious.
Willingly or not, Downing Street and the White House provoked the guerrillas to
these latest attacks [Beslan school massacre in 2004]. Willingly or not, Great
Britain and the USA have nurtured the separatists with material, information
and diplomatic resources. Willingly or not, the policy of London and Washington
fostered the current terrorist acts.” “As the ancients said, cui bono? Perhaps
we are too hasty with such sweeping accusations against our ‘friends’ and
‘partners’? Is there a motive for the Anglo-American ‘anti-terrorist coalition’
to fan the fires of terror in the North Caucasus?” “Alas, there is a motive. It
is no secret, that the West is vitally interested in maintaining instability in
the Caucasus. That makes it easier to pump out the fossil fuels, extracted in
the Caspian region, and it makes it easier to control Georgia and Azerbaijan,
and to exert influence on Armenia. Finally, it makes it easier to drive Russia
out of the Caspian and the Caucasus. Divide et impera! – the leaders of the
Roman Empire already introduced this simple formula for subjugation.
Yet Akhmadov was not the only
separatist terrorist that was given asylum in the Western Anglo Zone. Akmad
Zakayev and Aslan Mashkhadov (given asylum in London, England) were also
granted protection by the U.S. and Britain in 2003. Zakayev is designated as
the “special representative” of Mashkhadov.
In
addition, it is also widely known within European media, political, and
intelligence circles that certain leaders of the Chechen terrorist networks are
closely connected to the American CIA, if not agents outright. Shamil Basayev,
described as the “brutal Chechen field commander” by Webster Tarpley, happens
to be one of those individuals. It should be noted that Basayev was linked to
the Beslan school massacre as well.
Furthermore, as
Webster Tarpley writes in his article, “Russians Blast US-UK Sponsorship Of Chechen Terror,”
As Michel Chossudovsky pointed out some
years back, the Chechen leaders Basayev and Al Khattab were trained in the
CIA-run camps for Islamic fighters in Afghanistan. In 1999, Putin rode to power
on a backlash against Chechen terror which he had in all probability staged
himself – thus judoing a long-standing US-UK capability. The key point is that
the Russian press is now openly denouncing London and Washington as centers for
terrorist control.
Tarpley continues by stating,
Around the time of 9/11, Putin had
pointed to open recruitment of Chechen terrorists going on in London, telling a
German interviewer: “In London, there is a recruitment station for people
wanting to join combat in Chechnya. Today — not officially, but effectively in
the open — they are talking there about recruiting volunteers to go to
Afghanistan.” (Focus — German weekly newsmagazine, September 2001) In addition,
it is generally known in well-informed European circles that the leaders of the
Chechen rebels were trained by the CIA, and that the Chechens were backed by
US-sponsored anti-Russian fighters from Afghanistan. In recent months, US-UK
backed Chechens have destroyed two Russian airliners and attacked a Moscow
subway station, in addition to the school atrocity.
Some aspects of Putin’s thinking were
further explained by a press interview given by Aslambek Aslakhanov, the
Chechen politician who is one of Putin’s official advisors. A dispatch from RIA
Novosti reported Aslakhanov’s comments as follows: “The terrorists who seized
the school in Beslan, North Ossetia, took their orders from abroad. ‘They were
talking with people not from Russia, but from abroad. They were being
directed,’ said Aslambek Aslakhanov, advisor to the President of the Russian
Federation. ‘It is the desire of our “friends” – in quotation marks — who have
probably for more than a decade been carrying out enormous, titanic work, aimed
at dismembering Russia. These people have worked very hard, and the fact that
the financing comes from there and that they are the puppet masters, is also
clear.” Aslakhanov, who was named by the terrorists as one of the people they
were going to hold talks with, also told RIA Novosti that the bid for such
“talks” was completely phony. He said that the hostage-takers were not
Chechens. When he talked to them, by phone, in Chechen, they demanded that he
talk Russian, and the ones he spoke with had the accents of other North
Caucasus ethnic groups. (RIA Novosti, September 6, 2004)
On September 7, RIA Novosti reported on
the demand of the Russian Foreign Ministry that two leading Chechen figures be
extradited from London and Washington to stand trial in Russia. A statement
from the Russia Foreign Ministry’s Department of Information and Press
indicated that Russia will put the United States and Britain on the spot about
extraditing two top Chechen separatist officials, who have been given asylum in
Washington and London, respectively. They are Akhmad Zakayev, known as a
“special representative” of Aslan Maskhadov (currently enjoying asylum in
London), and Ilyas Akhmadov, the “Foreign Minister” of the unrecognized
“Chechen Republic-Ichkeria” (now residing in the USA). (RIA Novosti, September
7, 2004)
Even
more than the open harboring of Chechen terrorists, however, is the fact that
Western agents have themselves been caught in the act of aiding and actually
conducting acts of terror. Indeed, toward the end of 2004, it was reported by
RBC that a British agent who was working for a Czech Republic-based NGO was
arrested for blowing up a Russian armed personnel carrier. It was also reported
that other British agents were caught “instructing Chechen gangs in how to lay
mines.”
Again, as Tarpley writes,
The RBC commentary goes on to cite
the Economist of August 19, which contained what RBC characterizes as a virtual
ultimatum to Russia. RBC notes that “the carrying out of such a series of
coordinated, highly professional terrorist attacks, would be impossible without
the help of qualified ‘specialists’.” RBC notes that at the end of August one
such “specialist,” working for an NGO based in the Czech republic, was arrested
for blowing up a Russian armed personnel carrier. Also, British “experts” have
been found instructing Chechen gangs in how to lay mines. “It cannot be excluded,
that also in Beslan, the logistics of the operation were provided by just such
‘specialists’,” notes RBC.
The RBC editorial concludes:
“Apparently, by having recourse to large-scale terrorist actions, the forces
behind that terrorism, have now acted directly to force a ‘change’ in the
political situation in the Caucasus, propagating interethnic wars into Russia.
“The only way to resist this, would be for Moscow to make it known, that we are
ready to fight a new war, according to new rules and new methods — not with
mythical ‘international terrorists’, who do not and never existed, but with the
controllers of the ‘insurgents and freedom fighters’; a war against the
geopolitical puppet-masters, who are ready to destroy thousands of Russians for
the sake of achieving their new division of the world.” (RBC, September 7,
2004)
Regardless of the final connections
regarding the Boston Bombing, the alleged perpetrators, and the connection to
Chechen terrorism, one must always be cognizant of the relevant geopolitical
facts in order to avoid being swindled and wholly misinformed by clouded
mainstream accounts of narratives that are, themselves, entirely mythical.
The myth of an independent (of
Anglo-American control) and organic al-Qaeda is one that is easily dismantled
upon even a small modicum of research and investigation. From the founding of
al-Qaeda by Western forces in the 1970s to
the use of death squads in Iraq,Libya, and now Syria, it is
clear that al-Qaeda is nothing less than a wholly owned subsidiary of the
Anglo-American intelligence community. It is, in effect, the CIA Arab Legion.
If the United States government eventually blames the Boston Bombings on Chechen terrorists, whether legitimately or intentionally by virtue of a false flag, then such a situation is undoubtedly a two-edged sword. If the American people are ever capable of understanding that international Muslim fundamentalist terrorist networks – from the United States, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Libya, or Chechnya – are entirely organized, directed, and controlled by Western Anglo-American powers themselves, it may prove to be the end of the imperialist foreign policy, domestic police state mechanisms, and austerity measures. If the American people, however, continue to bite the bait of terror and fear, there may be no limits to the depths the United States and the rest of the world will sink.
If the United States government eventually blames the Boston Bombings on Chechen terrorists, whether legitimately or intentionally by virtue of a false flag, then such a situation is undoubtedly a two-edged sword. If the American people are ever capable of understanding that international Muslim fundamentalist terrorist networks – from the United States, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Libya, or Chechnya – are entirely organized, directed, and controlled by Western Anglo-American powers themselves, it may prove to be the end of the imperialist foreign policy, domestic police state mechanisms, and austerity measures. If the American people, however, continue to bite the bait of terror and fear, there may be no limits to the depths the United States and the rest of the world will sink.
Notes:[1] Tarpley, Webster Griffin. 9/11 Synthetic
Terror: Made In USA. 4th Edition. Progressive Press. 2007. Pp. 428-431.
§ Habiba
From the Internet archives:
In 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA, Webster Tarpley refers to SSS as the UK terror
school for patsies and that London is one of the main recruiting grounds for
patsies, dupes, fanatics, double agents, and other roustabouts of the terrorist
scene.
A
window into the London state-sponsored synthetic terror milieu came in December
2001, when British authorities were forced to arrest and question Mark Yates, a
self-styled security expert who ran a firearms training camp in Alabama. Yates
was suspected of helping Islamic terrorist patsies from Britain who were to
hone their marksmanship skills on American soil before going off to fight for
Islamic causes around the globe. Yates, a British bodyguard and firearms
trainer who had operations in both the United Kingdom and the United States,
allegedly offered “live fire” weapons training in America for aspiring holy
warriors. British police thought that Yates was involved on the US end of the
“Ultimate Jihad Challenge” training program offered on the London market by the
Sakina Security Services company, owned by Suleiman Bilal Zain-ul-abidin.
Yates, who was also the operations and training director at the Ground Zero
firearms training camp outside Marion, Alabama, denied everything. “Ultimate
Jihad Challenge” included instruction in “art of bone breaking,” and learning
to “improvise explosive devices.”
British Moslems would be given the
opportunity to squeeze off up to 3,000 rounds at a shooting range in the United
States before heading off to fight for Islamic causes around the world. The
Sunday Telegraph reported about another military training course, this time at
a secret camp near the village of Yetgoch in southern Wales. Young Moslems and
others learned how to use Uzi machine guns at the camp, which was run by Trans
Global Security International.
The reports of the Welsh training
camp rekindled a debate in Britain over how the UK had become a hotbed for
military recruitment by radical Islamic elements. Sheik Omar Bakri Mohammed
said in 2000 that between 1,800 and 2,000 British Moslems were going abroad
each year for military training. “We find young men in university classes or
mosques, invite them for a meal and discuss “ongoing attacks being suffered by
Moslems in Chechnya, Palestine or Kashmir,” Bakri Mohammed said. “We … make
them understand their duty to support the jihad (holy war) struggle verbally,
financially and, if they can, physically in order to liberate their homeland.”
Bakri’s al-Muhajiroun group, like al Qaeda, advocated wiping out the world’s
50-plus existing Moslem-majority states and replacing them with a single
“khilafah” (caliphate), or Islamic state. (Sunday Telegraph, MSNBC, December
27, 2001)
The role of London as the leading
center of Islamic radicalism has been an open secret for years, but has never been
reported by the US controlled corporate media. In the nineteenth century, when
Mazzini and Marx operated out of London, the slogan was that “England supports
all revolutions but her own.”
In
the post-colonial world, the British have found it to their advantage to
encourage violent movements which could be used for destabilizations and
assassinations in the former colonies, which their ex-masters did not want to
see become strong and effective modern states.
Between
1995 and 1999, protests were lodged by many countries concerning the
willingness of the British government to permit terror groups to operate from
British territory. Among the protestors were: Israel, Algeria, Turkey, Libya,
Yemen, India, Egypt, France, Peru, Germany, Nigeria, and Russia.
A number of groups which were cited
as terrorist organizations by the US State Department had their headquarters in
London. Among them were the Islamic Group of Egypt, led by Zawahiri, who was a
known participant in the plot to assassinate Egyptian President Sadat; this was
also the group which had murdered foreign tourists at Luxor in an attempt to
wreck the Egyptian tourist industry.
Non-Anglo-Saxon press organs have
from time to time pointed up the role of London in worldwide subversion. “The
track of … the GIA leader in Paris leads to Great Britain. The British capital
has served as logistical and financial base for the terrorists,” wrote Le
Figaro on Nov. 3, 1995, in the wake of a murderous terror attack carried out in
France. A report by the French National Assembly in October 2001 alleged that
London played the key role as clearinghouse for money laundering of criminal
and terrorist organizations.
In the midst of a campaign of
destabilization against Egypt in the mid-1990s, the semi-official organ of the
Egyptian government pointed out that “Britain has become the number one base in
the world for international terrorism.” (Al Ahram, Cairo, September 7, 1996)
Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak noted that “… some states, like Britain, give
political asylum to terrorists, and these states will pay the price for that.”
(Al-Hayat, September 18, 1996)
By
the late 1990s, there were so many Islamic extremists in London that the city
had acquired the nickname of “Londonistan.”
President
Putin of Russia saw a direct link between the London Islamic scene and
terrorism in his own country. He said in an interview with a German news
magazine: “In London, there is a recruitment station for people wanting to join
combat in Chechnya. Today — not officially, but effectively in the open — they
are talking there about recruiting volunteers to go to Afghanistan.” (Focus,
September 2001)
Brixton Mosque was one of the notorious centers for terrorist recruitment in the heart of London. This was the home base of Zacharias Mousawi, the French citizen put on trial in Alexandria, Va. It was also the home of Richard Reid, the shoe bomber of December 2001. Imam Qureshi of Brixton and others were allowed by the British authorities to preach anti-US sermons to the some 4,000 Moslem inmates in British prisons, and thus to recruit new patsies for the world-wide terror machine. The rival of Brixton Mosque was the equally redoubtable Finsbury Mosque, the home of the Saudi demagogue al Masri, who was finally taken into custody in the spring of 2004.
Brixton Mosque was one of the notorious centers for terrorist recruitment in the heart of London. This was the home base of Zacharias Mousawi, the French citizen put on trial in Alexandria, Va. It was also the home of Richard Reid, the shoe bomber of December 2001. Imam Qureshi of Brixton and others were allowed by the British authorities to preach anti-US sermons to the some 4,000 Moslem inmates in British prisons, and thus to recruit new patsies for the world-wide terror machine. The rival of Brixton Mosque was the equally redoubtable Finsbury Mosque, the home of the Saudi demagogue al Masri, who was finally taken into custody in the spring of 2004.
You say,
“There’s this example from a US
newspaper they posted painting Russians as monsters “Russian counterstrike: families held hostage in Chechnya”
and from WaPo attacking Putin, “Chechnya can and must be mended” which accuses
Russia of setting up the exact same scenario NED uses in every country where it
staged color revolutions, written by the chairman of the CIA’s Central
Asia-Caucasus Institute at Johns Hopkins University; “Russian President
Vladimir Putin declares that the only acceptable outcome is the one he seeks to
effect through a puppet government imposed on the dissident republic through
rigged elections.”
Then from the Guardian, UK, mathaba.net posted, “Russia puts price on Chechen rebels’ heads“.
It refers to massive protests against Russian “terrorists” without noting that
the protests in were staged by USAID – NED agitators.”
According to the The American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus website
they were founded by Freedom House in 1999.
Even though they had a well
established internet presence for years and anyone could look up who they were
and see their connections, mathaba.net still posted their material in 2004.
Although they would argue that AK
(too many aliases to list) won a case against the Telegraph for implicating him
in 9-11 because he ran the SSS website (their links on all the SSS web-pages is
significant, not incidental) they still continued to support the work of SSS by
promoting extremist groups, be they Chechen Al Qaeda or far right Nazis that
were engaged in assassinations and destabilizations in anti-imperialist
countries.
Both AK and Frank Etim (aka
Zain-ul-abidin) claimed membership in the Libyan World Mathaba. To date, no one
from the genuine Libyan World Mathaba or the Libyan Revolutionary Committees
has ever supported this myth. On the contrary, they have emphatically insisted
there was never a connection.
The proof is in the contrasting ideology
and Libya’s commitment to demolishing the entire Al Qaeda network while the
other was invested in supporting the enemies of the Libyan Jamahiriya and
global revolutionary governments.
3. Álvaro d'Escoto
Formerly
called the American Committee for Peace in Chechnya, the American Committee for
Peace in the Caucasus (ACPC) is a project of Freedom House that claims to be “dedicated to monitoring
developments in the region and providing expert analysis of their implications
for security, stability and the human rights situation.”[1]
ACPC was founded in 1999 by Freedom House, a neoconservative organization that has worked closely with the U.S. government, receiving funds from the National Endowment for Democracy and other U.S. democratization initiatives. ACPC updated its name to include the broader region after conflicts erupted between Russia and other Caucasus enclaves such as Ingushetia, Dagestan, Kabardino-Balkaria, Karachay-Cherkessia and North Ossetia.[2]
ACPC was founded in 1999 by Freedom House, a neoconservative organization that has worked closely with the U.S. government, receiving funds from the National Endowment for Democracy and other U.S. democratization initiatives. ACPC updated its name to include the broader region after conflicts erupted between Russia and other Caucasus enclaves such as Ingushetia, Dagestan, Kabardino-Balkaria, Karachay-Cherkessia and North Ossetia.[2]
ACPC’s activities include organizing public
education programs, developing policy recommendations for lawmakers, and
collaborating with activists, journalists, and scholars. It also works closely
with a range of nongovernmental policy groups and think tanks, including the
neoconservative policy outfit the American
Enterprise Institute and the right-wing Jamestown
Foundation. The committee distributes a weekly
email news service and newsletter entitled News
of the Week. ACPC’s web site contains a news archive, policy
papers relating to the U.S. role in the Caucasus, and academic papers, maps,
and photos of the conflict.
Glen Howard, the president of the Jamestown
Foundation, also serves as ACPC’s executive director.[3] Howard previously worked as a
military analyst for Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), a
high-tech defense contractor, and has served as a consultant for the Department
of Defense, National Intelligence Council, and “major oil companies operating
in Central Asia and the Middle East.”[4]
The publications of Howard’s two organizations
often overlap. For example, the Jamestown Foundation produces North
Caucasus Weekly, an ezine that features contributions
by ACPC board members.[5] ACPC’s website is typically dominated
by reposts from Jamestown. Both groups also work extensively with Soviet
defectors and Chechen dissidents.
ACPC’s board of directors has included both
Democratic and Republican elites, including Zbigniew Brzezinski, Alexander M.
Haig, Jr., Steven J. Solarz, and Max
Kampelman. The committee’s more than one
hundred members has also reflected a wide political spectrum, including such
figures as Richard Gere, Morton Abramowitz, and the late Geraldine Ferraro.
However, membership is overwhelmingly hawkish, and many high-profile neoconservatives,
some associated with the Project
for the New American Century, have featured on its membership
rolls, including Richard
Perle, Frank
Gaffney, Elliott
Abrams, Midge
Decter, William
Kristol, Michael
Ledeen, and James
Woolsey.[6]
ACPC supports the Chechen rebel movement,
apparently as a strategy to weaken Russia and establish better U.S. ties in a
region of increasing geopolitical value, which has vast, unexploited natural
resource reserves including rich oil, gas, and hard mineral deposits.[7]
ACPC is perhaps the only U.S.-based organization in
which national security militarists and neoconservatives openly support an insurgent
movement that is not only nationalist but also largely Islamist.[8] Although ACPC notes its concern about
human rights violations and issues of self-determination, far more attention
appears to be given to simply advancing U.S. geopolitics by weakening Russia
and China.[9]
The Smith
Richardson Foundation has been the largest donor to the
ACPC, giving sums totaling almost $420,000 to Freedom House from 2002-2004.[10]
Sources
[1]American Committee
for Peace in the Caucasus, “About ACPC,”http://www.peaceinthecaucasus.org/about.
[2]American Committee
for Peace in the Caucasus, “About ACPC,”http://www.peaceinthecaucasus.org/about.
[6]American Committee
for Peace in Chechnya, “Members,”http://web.archive.org/web/20051220135920/http://www.peaceinchechnya.org/about_members.htm.
[7]The Jamestown
Foundation, Chechnya Weekly for
March 9, 16, and 23, 2005,http://web.archive.org/web/20070930182502/http://www.jamestown.org/publications_archives.php?publication_id=1.
[8]John Laughland,
“The Chechens’ American Friends,” The Guardian, September 8, 2004,http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/08/usa.russia.
[10]Conservative
Transparency,“Smith Richardson Foundation,”http://mediamattersaction.org/transparency/organization/Smith_Richardson_Foundation/grants.
Thank you Álvaro.
Without
trial, an opportunity to testify (unable to speak) and without legal
representation…
Boston
bombing suspect gets death penalty charge
…Although
Auken frames it as a “class struggle”, this is a battle between the more deeply
encroaching police state and the rule of law, human rights and civil liberties
in the USA…
By Bill Van Auken
23 April 2013
23 April 2013
Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the 19-year-old
surviving suspect in the Boston Marathon bombings, was formally charged Monday
with use of and conspiracy to use a weapon of mass destruction resulting in
death, a federal offense that carries the death penalty.
A federal judge was brought to
Tsarnaev’s hospital bed along with an assistant US attorney and a public
defender for the formal presentation of the charges. Tsarnaev, who suffered
multiple wounds before his capture last Friday, remains in serious condition,
on a ventilator and under sedation. He is reportedly unable to verbally
communicate because of a gunshot wound to the throat.
With one brother dead and the other
wounded so he cannot speak, there is no one to contradict the official story
that the two operated alone and without any knowledge of US intelligence
agencies.
The hospital hearing marked the first
time since his capture that Tsarnaev, a US citizen, has seen a lawyer. The
Obama administration announced its intention not to read him his Miranda rights
to remain silent and be represented by an attorney on the pretext of a “public
safety” exemption, even though law enforcement officials in Boston assured the
public that they were in no further danger. This gave an FBI-CIA interrogation
team unfettered access to Tsarnaev, who was reportedly able to respond only by
moving his head or writing down answers.
In his formal statement announcing
the charges, Attorney General Eric Holder paid tribute “to the valor of state
and local police, the dedication of federal law enforcement and intelligence
officials, and the vigilance of members of the public.” John Carlin, the acting
assistant attorney general for national security, added, “The events of the
past week underscore in stark terms the need for continued vigilance against
terrorist threats both at home and abroad.”
But even as the Justice Department
and the FBI were patting each other on the back, a group of lawmakers raised
pointed questions as to how and why the FBI failed to prevent the bombing after
the older brother, Tamerlan, had been identified to the agency by the Russian
government as a terrorist suspect.
In a letter to FBI Director Robert
Mueller and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, the Republican
chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, Michael McCaul of Texas, and
its former chairman, Republican Congressman Peter King of New York, demanded
all material related to Tsarnaev’s case, including classified reports. The two
wrote:
“The FBI interviewed Tamerlan
Tsarnaev at the request of a foreign liaison service, on the basis of suspicions
that Tsarnaev was involved in terrorist activities. Tsarnaev subsequently
traveled to and from Russia and posted jihadist materials on his social media.
Yet Tsarnaev remained at liberty in this country to conduct the Boston attack,
and it took days to publicly identify him as a suspect.”
In a television interview Sunday,
McCaul asked, “If he [Tamerlan] was on the radar and they let him go, if he was
on the Russians’ radar, why wasn’t a flag put on him, some sort of customs
flag?”
The FBI has publicly claimed that it
interviewed Tamerlan only once, in 2011, but found no evidence that he was of
any concern. It also claimed that the Russian government failed to provide any
further information substantiating its warning.
Every aspect of this official story
has been called into question in the wake of the Boston bombings.
The mother of the two brothers has
stated in interviews that the FBI maintained continuous contact with her elder
son over the course of three to five years. “They were controlling his every
step,” she said. She also recounted that FBI agents had told her that “Tamerlan
was an extremist leader and they were afraid of him.”
The Moscow-based correspondent of
Newsweek and the Daily Beast, Anna Nemtsova, interviewed a “well-placed
security source” in Russia, who said that when Tamerlan visited Dagestan for
six months in 2012, Russian security services and police in Dagestan were
“watching him closely for five months and three weeks” and had compiled an
extensive dossier on him.
The Tsarnaev family had its roots in
neighboring Chechnya, the scene of two bitter separatist wars in the 1990s that
gave rise to an armed Islamist movement. Neither the parents nor the two
brothers, who grew up largely in the US, had ever lived there.
NBC News, meanwhile, reported that
Tamerlan had been monitored by Russian police agencies as he visited a “known
Islamic militant” in a mosque in Dagestan during his six-month visit. It
further quoted a local police official as saying that an extensive case file on
the 26-year-old had been sent to the FBI, together with a request for
information. The FBI reportedly never replied.
Britain’s Channel 4 News reported on
Sunday, quoting the father of the two brothers, that days after the bombings,
Tamerlan received a phone call from the FBI accusing him of being responsible
for the attack.
The multiple reports indicating far
more extensive contact with Tamerlan Tsarnaev and knowledge of his activities
than the FBI has admitted raise a number of questions.
Why did the FBI effectively ignore
the Russian warning, as well as, apparently, a dossier detailing contacts with
Islamist elements? Why did it conceal its sustained contact with the 26 year
old?
An attempt to cover up gross
incompetence is certainly not excluded. However, a more plausible explanation
is that US intelligence agencies had developed plans for using their knowledge
about Tamelan’s activities to their own advantage.
Given its covert support for
separatist movements in the Caucasus, it is entirely possible that Washington
decided not to interfere with someone who could be viewed as an asset in
furthering these movements. The Chechen Islamists have also supplied
substantial numbers of fighters for the war for regime-change in Syria, which
Washington is backing.
It is also possible that the FBI
could utilize such intelligence to blackmail Tsarnaev into working as its
confidential informant in the US itself.
One side of the Boston Marathon
bombings that the corporate media has virtually blacked out is the
extraordinary security measures that were in place before any bombing took
place. A number of participants have noted that bomb-sniffing dogs were present
both at the starting and finish line, as well as police spotters on rooftops,
something they had never seen at previous marathons. Indeed, announcements were
made at the beginning of the race telling participants not to be concerned and
that the extraordinary security was part of “a training exercise.”
Also blacked out from media coverage
is the participation in this “exercise” of a shadowy Blackwater-style
security/mercenary outfit by the name of Craft International. Photographs of
operatives of this firm, dressed in identical black jackets, combat fatigue
pants and desert combat boots, and wearing shirts and caps bearing its logo—a
bleeding skull with a target site in its eye socket—have been widely posted on
the Internet.
Photographs of these mercenaries show
them wearing large black backpacks that are similar to those that were said to
have carried the pressure-cooker explosive devices that blew up at the
marathon’s finish line.
The question arises as to whether the
Tsarnaev brothers were the witting or unwitting participants in an exercise
that went wrong, or one that was organized by the American state with the aim
of producing precisely the results that it did.
What were those results? The US
military and intelligence apparatus was able to utilize an isolated terrorist
incident to carry out the most massive deployment of militarized police in the
country’s history, subjecting an entire metropolitan area of over one million
people to what amounted to martial law.
Under conditions of mounting social
tensions driven by the protracted economic crisis and ever deepening social
inequality, such a deployment provides training and experience for use in
confronting the future eruption of class struggle.
Today it comes to light that the
elder brother was recruited and radicalized by the CIA NGO, theJamestown Foundation,
including other interrelated organizations noted in the comments above.
NGO’s either radicalize youth for
violence (ie Al Qaeda) or pacify them through instruction in direct action
tactics (CANVAS / Ruckus Society).
“Let me be clear. This is not about
improving the future for the youth…
It is about exploiting the most
vulnerable and impressionable segment of the population, utilizing their
energy, idealism and angst to further globalist agendas that benefit only the
elite. This is ruthless predation at its worst and is utterly unconscionable.”
George Soros: Imperial
Wizard-Double Agent
Democracy Promotion: America’s New Regime Change Focus
Snipers and Death Squads: Terror Tactics Of U.S. Soft Power
Alliance of Youth Movements, Color Revolutions and the Globalist Agenda
Democracy Promotion: America’s New Regime Change Focus
Snipers and Death Squads: Terror Tactics Of U.S. Soft Power
Alliance of Youth Movements, Color Revolutions and the Globalist Agenda
Take a look at some of the recent
NATO activity in the region:
Georgia Offers NATO
Baku-Tbilisi-Kars Railway For Afghan War Transit
Russian Pacific Fleet Naval Force May Dock In Syria Next Month
NATO Border: Russia To Deploy Fighter Jets, Missiles To Belarus
Baltics: 5,000 Troops In NATO Article 5 Exercise
Poland: NATO Escalates Military Role On Belarus, Russia Borders
NATO Conducts Air Exercise Over Baltics And Scandinavia
Massive Formation: U.S. Marines Begin Combat Training In Baltics
Poland: U.S. Military Colony On Russian, Belarusian Borders
U.S. General Oversees Training Of Georgian Combat Troops
Russian Pacific Fleet Naval Force May Dock In Syria Next Month
NATO Border: Russia To Deploy Fighter Jets, Missiles To Belarus
Baltics: 5,000 Troops In NATO Article 5 Exercise
Poland: NATO Escalates Military Role On Belarus, Russia Borders
NATO Conducts Air Exercise Over Baltics And Scandinavia
Massive Formation: U.S. Marines Begin Combat Training In Baltics
Poland: U.S. Military Colony On Russian, Belarusian Borders
U.S. General Oversees Training Of Georgian Combat Troops
o Álvaro d'Escoto
With
NATO obstructed in Syria by Russia, reactivating the Chechen campaign is a
logical strategy so the imperialists can destroy Syria with impunity.
Chechnya has a legitimate, peaceful
opposition that employs diplomacy to resolve differences with Russia.
The Islamists are a distinct group that
work against Russia and Chechnya. Their agenda is establishment of an Islamic
Caliphate in Chechnya and the world at large through violence and the
extermination of everyone that refuses to convert to Wahhabism.
Supporting
Chechen Islamists is as destructive to Chechens as supporting al Qaeda in Libya
and Syria has been to the people in both nations. Over 100,000 dead in Libya
and rising. Over 70,000 dead in Syria to date.
“The Islamists are a distinct group
that work against Russia and Chechnya. Their agenda is establishment of an
Islamic Caliphate in Chechnya and the world at large through violence and the
extermination of everyone that refuses to convert to Wahhabism.
Supporting Chechen Islamists is as
destructive to Chechens as supporting al Qaeda in Libya and Syria has been to
the people in both nations. Over 100,000 dead in Libya and rising. Over 70,000
dead in Syria to date.”
Thank you Álvaro. Well stated.
“With NATO obstructed in Syria by
Russia, reactivating the Chechen campaign is a logical strategy so the
imperialists can destroy Syria with impunity.”
Essentially, Sibel voices a similar
concern in her sixth Gladio B video.
Because what happens in Chechnya can have a domino effect, bringing down Syria,
Iran, etc., this is something we need to be more informed about.
To the youth who might consider
joining the globalist’s “jihad” training, I would advise they step back because
they will be nothing but cannon fodder, dupes and patsies for imperialist wars.
They and their families will be used, shamed and betrayed.
The same advice goes to anyone
contemplating joining any NWO NGO direct action training camp because no
genuine revolution that benefits the people will ever happen that way.
Uncle of Tsarnaev brothers worked for
USAID and company linked to Halliburton
Ruslan
Tsarni.
Following Zubeidat Tsarnaev’s claim
that her son, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, was set-up by the FBI, her brother-in-law, Ruslan
Tsarni, was rolled out to engage in damage control and save the
official narrative on the Boston bombings.
Tsarni called his nephews “losers” and insisted that because the brothers had failed to integrate themselves in the United States they were consumed with hatred.
Tsarni called his nephews “losers” and insisted that because the brothers had failed to integrate themselves in the United States they were consumed with hatred.
The establishment media immediately
spotlighted “Uncle Ruslan,” as they affectionately called him, and attempted to
bury or at least minimize the impact of Zubeidat Tsarnaev’s claim that her sons
are patsies.
“Tsarni’s own emotions have taken a
roller-coaster of guilt and anger, he said in an interview, fueled by the
family’s failure to recognize that Tamerlan’s interest in Islam over the past
six years may have crossed into violent radicalism,” Bloomberg reported
on Wednesday.
Uncle Ruslan, however, isn’t merely a
concerned relative. It is said he not only worked for the U.S. Agency for
International Development (USAID) in the former Soviet Republic of Kazakhstan,
but also did time with Big Sky
Energy Corp., a gas and oil corporation with ties to Cheney’s Halliburton,
a Pentagon contractor in bed
with the CIA.
As we noted on
Wednesday, USAID is an agency used by the U.S. government to operate
“humanitarian” NGOs instrumental in running color revolutions in former Soviet
states. It collaborates with the Freedom House, the
CIA front the National Endowment for Democracy, Soros Foundations, and the CIA’s Ford Foundation to
undermine governments in the former Soviet Union, now the Russian Federation.
6. Administrator
Chechen
President: Events in Syria foreign campaign to destroy the country
Jun 15, 2013
 |
Moscow, (SANA)-Chechen President
Ramazan Kadyrov affirmed that what is going on in Syria is not jihad, but a
campaign plotted by foreign powers to “overthrow the regime, destroy the
country and liquidate its armed forces .”
“It
is not a secret that the so-called Syrian opposition is led by foreign special
institutions which try to recruit the youths coming from Russia to involve them
in fighting in Syria,” President Kadyrov said in a speech to Russian Inter Fax
Agency on Saturday.
He
referred to a number of Chechen men which fight in Syria, saying “according to
our information, five or six Chechen men were killed in Syria.”
Kadyrov
underlined the importance of clarifying the nature of the so-called ‘Syrian
opposition”, and its relation to Islam through mass media.
He
quoted Muslim scholars as saying that there is no feature of jihad in Syria,
but a plot to destroy Syria.
Mazen
Top Five
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.