Canada Approves Nuclear Waste Site on Great Lakes Shore
A Canadian advisory panel on Wednesday approved a plan to bury nuclear
waste at a site just steps away from Lake Huron, saying it had concluded the
project would pose no danger to the environment. The Joint Review Panel made
its recommendation in a report to Canada's environment minister, Leona
Aglukkaq, who is expected to issue a decision within 120 days.
"The Panel concludes that the project is not likely to cause
significant adverse environmental effects" given the measures contemplated
to curb them, says the 457-page report. Despite 152 communities voicing
opposition to the project, the panel endorsed the Deep Geologic Repository
(DGR), which would see nuclear waste buried some 2,000 feet underground near
the shore of Lake Huron.
The panel said the project would be the first of its kind in North
America. Ontario Power Generation, the group behind the DGR, released a statement
on Wednesday expressing its overall satisfaction with the panel's report.
"OPG developed the DGR with one goal in mind: to create permanent,
safe storage for Ontario's low- and intermediate-level nuclear waste,"
said senior vice-president Laurie Swami. "We are pleased with the Panel's
conclusion that the project will safely protect the environment." Among
the project's opponents is Beverly Fernandez, of Stop the Great Lakes Nuclear
Dump, who said that she was "deeply disappointed" by the report's recommendations.
"The last place to bury and abandon radioactive nuclear waste is
beside the largest body of fresh-water in the world," Fernandez said.
Publicly owned OPG wants to bury 7.1 million cubic feet of waste from nuclear
plants about 2,230 feet below the earth's surface at the Bruce Power generating
station near Kincardine, Ontario.
According to OPG, the nuclear material would be entombed in stable rock
formations more than 450 million years old and would not contaminate the lake.
The proposal has also drawn criticism from some members of Congress and
Michigan state legislators, and dozens of municipal councils around the Great
Lakes have spoken out against it.
"The Panel fully agrees that Lake Huron and the other Great Lakes
are precious resources that demand society's highest level of protection and
regard," the panel said in its report.
But it added that an exhaustive review had found the project "is
not likely to cause significant adverse effects on the water quality or aquatic
ecosystems," provided OPG meets a lengthy list of conditions. If Aglukkaq,
the environment minister, approves the project, the review panel will decide
whether to issue a construction license. OPG said it could break ground on the
project by 2018 at the earliest, with the $1 billion facility opening no sooner
than 2025.
http://www.nuclearpowerdaily.com/reports/Canada_Approves_Nuclear_Waste_Site_on_Great_Lakes_Shore_999.html
----------------------
MAY 14 2015
Canada's Environment matters 2 all of us- just look at our beloved USA and the disasters there with over 1 million fracking wells that we know of... and now Obama and Putin are looking at the Arctic 4 oil?? come on... IDLE NO MORE CANADA... Idle no more....imho
Lax Kw'alaams First Nation unanimously rejects LNG terminal
| MAY 14, 2015
In the third and final vote Tuesday night, the Lax Kw'alaams First Nation voted against the proposed Pacific NorthWest LNG terminal, despite a $1-billion offer to them to accept it.
The Globe and Mail reports, "Lax Kw'alaams members voting in the final of three meetings have unanimously rejected a $1-billion cash offer from Pacific NorthWest LNG, declining to give aboriginal consent sought by the project while creating uncertainty for plans to export liquefied natural gas from British Columbia's north coast. The lure of the money to be spread over 40 years is being overshadowed by what the native group views as excessive environmental risks. The Lax Kw'alaams fear the Pacific NorthWest LNG project led by Malaysia's Petronas will harm juvenile salmon habitat in Flora Bank, located next to the proposed export terminal site on Lelu Island."
The article continues, "In the first vote in Lax Kw'alaams, 181 eligible voters unanimously stood up to indicate their opposition to the LNG proposal. In the second vote in Prince Rupert, the pattern continued as 257 eligible voters declined to provide aboriginal consent. ...In Vancouver, 112 Lax Kw'alaams members stood up to convey their No votes, two sources close to the native group said. Dozens of others phoned and e-mailed band officials to signal their opposition." Reuters adds, "'100 percent Vote No!!', one Lax Kw'alaams member wrote on Facebook, and posted a video of the entire room standing up in opposition to the offer."
A Bloomberg news article notes, "The Lax Kw'alaams group has raised concerns including the potential destruction of salmon habitat, the lack of access the community would have to harvest traditional plants near the terminal, and the risk that its seafood resources would be contaminated."
Lax Kw'alaams Mayor Garry Reece says the final decision will be made by the 13-member Lax Kw'alaams council and announced this week.
The Canadian Press cautions, "[B.C. premier Christy] Clark says she believes reaching a negotiated agreement with the 3,700-member Lax Kw'allams First Nation, on whose territory the terminal would be built, is only a matter a time. ...Lelu Island is Crown land managed by the Prince Rupert Port Authority, which means the province technically has the authority to push ahead without support from the Lax Kw'allams. Even if the First Nation band proves it has aboriginal title -- which would require proving it has had exclusive occupancy of the territory -- Supreme Court precedent gives the province the right to override that claim."
A decision by Petronas, the company behind the Pacific NorthWest terminal, on whether or not to proceed with the project is expected by mid-year.
The Council of Canadians is opposed to the Pacific NorthWest LNG and stands in solidarity with the Lax Kw'alaams First Nation.
------------
MAY 14, 2015
Message to MPs: We need meaningful action on fracking
| MAY 14, 2015
Tuesday morning Indigenous lawyer Caleb Behn, pediatrician Dr. Kathleen Nolan and Ipresented to members of Parliament and senatorsurging meaningful action from the federal government on fracking.
At the breakfast briefing, I gave an overview on fracking across Canadian and Indigenous communities. Officials in attendance included NDP member of Parliament François Choquette, Liberal environment critic John Mackay, Green Party leader Elizabeth May, Senator Richard Neufeld, Senator Kelvin Ogilvie, Liberal water critic Francis Scarpaleggia and Senator Judith Seidman. Representations from the Assembly of First Nations also attended including Will David (Special Advisor - Implementing Rights), Irving LeBlanc (Special Advisor - Housing, Infrastructure and Emergency Issues Management Safe, Secure and Sustainable Communities) and Judy Whiteduck (Director of Economic Development).
Where are there moratoriums on fracking?
Communities have been raising a number of serious concerns about fracking including the risk of drinking water contamination. A recent study published shows that drinking water in Pennsylvania was contaminated by fracking. There are also risks to climate change, public health, ecosystems and wildlife. The potential for earthquakes and the lack of safe methods to dispose of fracking wastewater are other key threats associated with fracking.
There has been a wave of moratoria in Eastern Canada including in Quebec, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Newfoundland and Labrador. It has been heartening to see a number of provincial governments listening to communities and putting a stop to fracking because of the risks.
Despite the moratorium in both Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, there are proposals to have municipalities in these provinces treat existing fracking wastewater in their municipal wastewater facilities. The wastewater would then be discharged into the local river and all of which connect to the Bay of Fundy. Colchester County recently rejected a proposal for their town. Newfoundland and Labrador is currently going through an independent review panel process.
There has been a NAFTA lawsuit launched against the Canadian government by the company Lone Pine Resources for Quebec's fracking moratorium. Trade agreements like NAFTA and CETA raise concerns because investor-state dispute settlement clauses can inhibit governments from implementing safety or environmental regulations.
While there is currently no horizontal, multi-stage fracking happening in Ontario, there are concerns industry wants to move forward with fracking which would put the Great Lakes at grave risk.
In Alberta, landowners have raised concerns about water contamination as well as health impacts on themselves and their livestock. Jessica Ernst is one example and the Supreme Court recently agreed to hear her case.
In British Columbia, there are up to 18 proposals to build Liquefied Natural Gas terminals along the Pacific Coast. Communities and First Nations are highlighting concerns about tanker safety and impacts on rivers and salmon.
Fracking recently started in the Northwest Territories. And now the Yukon government is opening its doors to fracking despite widespread opposition from Yukoners and First Nations. Maude Barlow, members of the Liard First Nation and I were recently in Whitehorse, Yukon to express opposition to fracking in the territory.
Fracking in northeastern B.C. and federal responsibility
Caleb Behn, a young lawyer from northeastern British Columbia, explained to members of Parliament and senators the scale of development in the northeast including the development of dams, pipelines, oil and gas and fracking projects.
Behn, who is also Eh Cho Dene and Dunne-Za from Treaty 8 Territory, talked about the impacts fracking has had on the land, water and wildlife. He showed shocking photos of lesions found in animals he has hunted not seen by past generations.
Photo by Caleb Behn
Behn emphasized the need for the federal government to step in and take responsibility under the national interest doctrine.
To learn more about Behn and his territory's experience with fracking, see the recently released documentary called Fractured Land.
Health impacts on fracking and New York's ban
Dr. Kathleen Nolan, a pediatrician with training in epidemiology, talked about the exponential increase in peer-reviewed research on the air quality, seismicity and health consequences.
Nolan, Senior Research Director for Catskill Mountainkeeper and co-founder of the Concerned Health Professionals of New York, described the children she has treated that have had seizures, chemical burns and other illnesses related to fracking. She talked about the clear link between these health impacts and fracking. Respiratory illnesses disappeared when they left their homes close to well sites and came back when they returned. The respiratory illnesses were manageable when they put in air filters in their homes.
She talked about the need for science to catch up with people's stories. Nolan made recommendations in how to address the current impacts on fracking including the use of tracers and the need to legally require companies to disclose the names of fracking chemicals (without the concentrations).
Behn and Nolan speak at the press conference
CBC reported, "Indigenous lawyer Caleb Behn, pediatrician Dr. Kathleen Nolan and Council of Canadians national water campaigner Emma Lui hit the stage at the Centre Block press theatre to call on the government to "act now … to protect public health, our drinking water, and ecosystems from the impact of fracking" by imposing "adequate regulations" and ensuring federal oversight of the industry."
In the press conference, Behn explained, "I am from northeastern B.C. We have some of the world's biggest hydraulic fracturing operations in terms of volume of water used. Our people have been reporting anecdotally for quite a while about the issues associated with this development. It has become clear over time as the science catches up to people's experience on the land adjacent to these developments that more has to be done."
He warned, "We can't race to the bottom line on energy and energy developments in this country without seriously considering the long term implications of these developments. There's no technology on this planet that can reclaim a contaminated aquifer."
DeSmog quoted Dr. Nolan, "People are getting sick...With water contamination there's a lag time between the time the contaminants enter the water and then enters the person and then the person gets ill….it could take years or decades before the contaminants reach people."
Watch the press conference and Q & A period.
The federal government and fracking
The Council of Canadian Academies' report, commissioned by Environment Canada, looked into the state of knowledge on the potential environmental impacts of fracking and mitigation options.
The report found there were critical gaps in information including on well deterioration and leaks, chemical migration or contamination, cumulative impacts, hydrogeology, wastewater injection and the safety of fracking chemicals. The report showed that decision makers do know enough about fracking to declare it safe.
The Council of Canadians conducted a poll last fall that found 70 per cent of Canadians want a national moratorium on fracking until it is scientifically proven to be safe. However, while fracking still occurs communities need federal leadership in the areas of public health, climate, fisheries, drinking water and toxic chemicals.
It has been roughly five years since the then environment minister Jim Prentice said environmental regulations are still a work in progress for Canada's booming shale gas industry and that environmental policies were being drawn up but impacted communities have not seen any concrete regulations that adequately address horizontal, multi-stage fracking.
What members of Parliament need to do
There are a number of areas where the federal government has responsibility to regulate fracking. Ministers, opposition critics and members of Parliament in impacted regions need to take concrete action in the following areas:
Fisheries Act: While the Fisheries Act has been gutted so that it now only prevents the depositing of deleterious substances that kills more than 50 per cent of fish at 100 per cent concentration over a 96 hour period, the Fisheries and Oceans Minister must still intervene in fracking wastewater disposal projects that impact waters frequented by fish. As mentioned, there are proposals in the Atlantic to treat fracking wastewater in municipal wasterwater systems.
Management of toxic chemicals: A memo to the Environment Minister in 2011 notes that under the Chemicals Management Plan (CMP), Environment Canada reviewed 265 chemicals used in the fracking process in both Quebec and the U.S. Only 13 of the 265 chemicals have been assessed under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act and only a quarter will be addressed under the CMP. Roughly half of the fracking chemicals did not meet the CMP criteria for further investigation, meaning these chemicals have not been assessed for potential risks to the public. Environment Minister Leona Aglukkaq and Health Minister Rona Ambrose must ensure that all chemicals commonly used in the fracking process must be assessed for public safety under the Chemicals Management Plan.
The UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: The Council of Canadian Academies report noted that the majority of shale gas reserves are on Indigenous lands. The Canadian government has endorsed the UNDRIP and therefore must obtain free, prior and informed consent on fracking and related projects.
Human right to water: Canada has also endorsed the UN resolutions recognizing the human right to water and sanitation and therefore is required to come up with a national plan of action. There were 1,838 drinking water advisories at the end of January. The federal government, including all members of Parliament must commit to developing a national water policy that addresses current threats to water such as fracking.
As Behn said, "We can't race to the bottom line on energy and energy developments in this country without seriously considering the long term implications of these developments. There's no technology on this planet that can reclaim a contaminated aquifer."
With the upcoming federal election, members of Parliament need to show real federal leadership and, along with federal election candidates, make genuine commitments to protect communities, public health, our climate and our water sources caused by fracking.
The Council of Canadians thanks Elizabeth May's office for helping to organize the briefing on fracking for members of Parliament and senators as well as the press conference.
---------------------
FEBRUARY 14 2015
Toxic
Waste in the US: Coal Ash (Trailer)
<iframe width="1000" height="563" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/9spcSIVh7P4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
February 10, 2015 | 12:09 pm
Coal ash, which contains many of the
world's worst carcinogens, is what's left over when coal is burnt for
electricity. An estimated 113 million tons of coal ash are produced annually in
the US, and stored in almost every state — some of it literally in people's
backyards. With very little government oversight and few safeguards in place,
toxic chemicals have been known to leak from these storage sites and into
nearby communities, contaminating drinking water and making residents sick.
In the upcoming series, VICE News travels
across the US to meet the people and visit the areas most affected by this
toxic waste stream. Since coal production is predicted to remain steady for the
next few decades, coal ash will be a problem that will affect the US for years
to come.
-----------
Vatican mulling new department to tackle
environmental issues
VATICAN CITY Thu Feb 12, 2015 10:21pm IST
Feb 12
(Reuters) - The Vatican is considering setting up an environmental think tank,
a spokesman said on Thursday, which could influence the opinion of the world's
1.2 billion Roman Catholics on such thorny issues as climate change.
Father
Federico Lombardi said the proposal was discussed at a closed-door meeting of
cardinals from around the world who are at the Vatican to deliberate a reform
of the Church's central administration, known as the Curia.
"We
see a growth in the awareness (of environmental problems) and in the importance
of reflection, commitment, and study of environmental issues and their relation
to social and human questions," he told reporters at a briefing.
Pope
Francis has said that man is destroying nature and betraying God's calling to
be stewards of creation.
Last
month, he said he believed man was primarily responsible for climate change and
he hoped a U.N. summit in Paris in November, due to agree a global pact to
limit greenhouse gases, would take a courageous stand.[IDn:nL3N0UU4R8].
The
pope's keenly awaited encyclical, or message to the whole Church, on the
environment is due in early summer. Lombardi said it would provide guidelines
for the Church's "serious and considerable" commitment to
environmental issues.
The
spokesman said the environment office would likely come under a new Curia
department grouping justice, peace and charity issues. (Reporting By Philip
Pullella; editing by Liisa Tuhkanen and Ralph Boulton)
----------------------
NOTE: top pollunting countries on the planet- Notice Canada with only 36 Million does NOT count-darkest 2 lightest brown
SHARE FROM THE USA-
USA- Oh Jesus Christ, Hail Mary... and we've been bitching about Australia, UK and EU and the greedy guzzilers have destroyed Asias and Africas and South America.... Oh Sweet Jesus....
SA has hundredsofthousands wells-USA-China determined2leadClimateChangeFrancethis yr What Is Fracking?:
http://youtu.be/6qKadxyMOYY via @YouTube
--------------------
ONCE AGAIN... USA'S GREED 4 WORLD DOMINATION- at the cost of Fracking over Fresh Water and clean soil is destroying our world... just like 2008 AND NOW the European Union is making pretend money??? WTF
BLOGGED:
F**KING BANKS/IMF/Corporate-Political/UN greed caused FINANCIAL CRASH- and 2day.... we are still there and close 2 a billion are unemployed and 4.3 billion eat dirt 4 breakfast- WTF???-15 million Canadians/101 million Americans/8million Brits/80Million Muslims/32million europeans/14 million Africans etc.- CHEATERS/CHEATERS- August 27 updates
---------------------
O Canada.... we are being hijacked because we dug in and took economy serious.... and our troop love.... and this is sooooo wrong..... that USA is betraying all nations by sucking up the poison from fracking, coal and oil.... 4.... GREED..... and world domination.... WTF????
global youth unemployment is horrendous- shame on greedy USA/Europe and UN- shame on u
-------------
SWEET JESUS, MOTHER MARY AND JOSEPH- ewwwwwww ewwwww ewwwww USA- us shame anyone giving a sheeeet about the environment- "More than a million fracked oil or gas wells exist in the U.S." with "Output from oil fracking in the U.S. has tripled..to more than three million barrels per day at the end of 2013." -
Fracking the USA: New Map Shows 1 Million Oil, Gas Wells
If you’re wondering where oil and gas production and hydraulic fracturing are happening near you, FracTracker has a new mapping tool that will help you find out.
Areas where America's 1.1 million oil and gas wells, both conventional and hydraulically fractured, are found are highlighted in orange. Texas, where many of the wells are concentrated, is excluded because FracTracker was unable to publish data from the state.
Click image to enlarge: Credit: FracTracker.org
Researchers at FracTracker, an independent oil and gas research group that started as a mapping project at the University of Pittsburgh’s Center for Healthy Environments and Communities, analyzed oil and gas well location data for all 50 states and created a map showing where most of those wells are, including wells that have been fracked and those that haven’t.
Fracking is the energy industry’s practice of injecting water, sand and chemicals deep underground at high pressure to extract crude oil and natural gas from dense rock formations. It’s controversial because of its not-fully-determined affect on public health and the environment. The fossil fuel produced by way of fracking contributes to climate change through the burning of crude oil and possible leaks of methane and other gas emissions from oil and natural gas production equipment and distribution pipelines.
RELATED | Gas Flaring is Wasting Fuel and Fueling Climate Change Scientists: Lack of Data Means Fracking Impacts Unknown Quebec Oil Train Explosion Visible from Space |
---|
The glaring exception to this is the state where you’ll find the highest concentration of oil and gas wells in the country — Texas.
FracTracker's map app also has the ability to zoom in on specific areas to show specific locations of individual oil and gas wells. Here, the map depicts the distribution of wells in the Denver-Julesburg Basin along Colorado's Front Range urban corridor, north of Denver and east of Boulder. Each dot represents one well.
Click image to enlarge: Credit: FracTracker.org
FracTracker researcher Matt Kelso said Texas, which has more than 300,000 active oil and gas wells, is the only state that charges a fee for researchers to obtain location data for its wells, and FracTracker chose not to publish the raw data or depict it on the map because Texas does not allow the data to be redistributed.
Aside from oil-rich Texas being a blank spot on the map, the oil and gas well location data the group compiled for the rest of the country comes with some interesting numbers and figures. To begin with, there is no confirmation that any of the wells included in FracTracker’s data have actually been fracked, except in Indiana, for which the group was able to obtain well fracking data.
However, nearly all directionally or horizontally drilled wells have been fracked, Kelso said.
A moratorium currently bars fracking from ocurring in the state of New York, but FracTracker's map shows that New York has many oil and gas wells. Here, the map shows a high concentration of wells in the Finger Lakes region of New York near Auburn, Seneca Falls and Geneva.
Click image to enlarge: Credit: FracTracker.org
Also of note: New York State, where a moratorium currently bans fracking until the state can decide how to regulate it, has more than 15,000 active oil and gas wells, mostly in western New York at the northern edge of the natural gas-rich Marcellus shale, FracTracker data show.
But the data also illustrate how conflicting definitions of an oil and gas well can result in dramatic discrepancies in a state’s well count.
For example, FracTracker data show that Colorado, where energy companies are feverishly drilling and fracking the Niobrara shale and other formations in the Denver-Julesburg Basin for crude oil and natural gas, ranks fourth in the nation for total active well count — 84,357 active wells. That’s fewer active oil and gas wells than only Texas, Pennsylvania and Kansas.
But the state of Colorado’s official active well count was only 51,814 wells as of March 4 — the day FracTracker released its data.
Colorado generally counts wells as “active” if they’re actually producing oil and gas, or have recently produced oil and gas. Kelso said FracTracker has a broader definition that includes wells that aren’t producing but haven’t yet been abandoned or permanently plugged. That means FracTracker's figures for how many oil and gas wells are currently in a state may be much, much larger than a state's official numbers.
Regardless how an “active” oil and gas well is defined, FracTracker’s map shows where oil and gas wells have been drilled, and it’s useful to anyone who wants to know where energy companies are looking for oil and gas, where they might drill for it in the future and where fracking could happen near you.
You May Also Like
New NASA Satellite Shows Future of Precip Imagery
Catch the Breeze: Wind Farms Blast Across U.S.
March Snowstorms 'Uncommon, but not Rare'
2013 Is 6th Warmest Year; Climate Change Contributes
A Cold U.S. Winter for Sure, but 8th Warmest Globally
Comments
By BrentC (Omaha)
on March 28th, 2014
How many more wells will it take until America is ‘Energy
Independent’ and ‘Energy Secure’, I say we will NEVER have enough, as we
are using it (and exporting it) as fast as we pull it out.on March 28th, 2014
Only a combination of Solar, Wind, Wave and even some Natural Gas will free up the flow of ‘Fossil Fuel’ for use in making those items that cannot be done with any of the other energy sources…....
Reply to this comment
By Chris (80524)
on March 29th, 2014
Isn’t a switch to natural gas from coal and oil a net benefit
on AGW? (As well as local air quality?) The size of the benefit (to
AGW) depends on methane leakage rates (and likely remains to be
determined), but still a net benefit, and a potentially large one?on March 29th, 2014
Reply to this comment
By Sue Spencer (NY)
on March 30th, 2014
“It’s controversial because of its not-fully-determined affect on public health and the environment.” on March 30th, 2014
(3rd paragraph above)
For all those who have had to abandon their Homes, whose well water has become a flammable toxic brew, whose Children have skin rashes, nosebleeds, and gastrointestinal pain….for those who have developed malignant tumors and chronic disease…for those who have died….and their Families and Friends….the unconscionable affect of fracking on public health and the environment has been determined quite fully enough….horribly so….
Reply to this comment
By Nick St Clare (E82AA)
on October 11th, 2014
Please everyone, join, like, and share this group, it has all the info you need on the failure rate of the cement seal.on October 11th, 2014
In ALL places where wells are drilled through the water table (around 90% in the UK), THE WATER TABLE WILL BE POLLUTED WITH OIL AND/OR GAS:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/338995586260297/
----------------
Kelly McParland: Harper’s
stand on emissions may not be popular, but it’s more honest than Obama’s
And we sure as Hell will take better f**king care of the Arctic than USA or Russia... ur greed is astounding.... USA u have put the world in jeopardy with your greed 4 world power- with oil hijacking and pretend money.... and pretending that u DON'T have over 100 MILLION UNEMPLOYED.... 48 Million homeless and in poverty.... OMG....
She's Called Nova Scotia- Rita MacNeil
We love u so much- Canada's Military, Militia, Reservists, Warriors of the North-our Rangers....and our Special Forces.... thank u... we love u dearly.... your bloodstains make our Canada Flag heavy... and our young, beautiful, brilliant fun and free Canada hold u and our children so close 3 our hearts... we love u so much...
------------------
BLOGSPOT:
CANADA'S SOCKEYE SALMON'S courage distinction verging on extinction-is teaching what us Climate Oldies have been preaching - each and every Canadian must actually GET INVOLVED IN CANADA'S NATURE- do something physical- not just dumb protests that cost $$$billions- go out and save our nature-our salmon teach us who we were and what we are losing...imho/OLD CANADIANS UNDERSTAND THIS- we grew up in WWII severe poverty and saving and using everything and always respect the land and sea- please get don't wave a poster- get actually involved- our nature's dying
http://nova0000scotia.blogspot.ca/2014/11/canadas-sockey-salmons-courage.html
------------------
blogged:
Electronic Waste dumped on poor -more damage 2 earth than all the rest- EU-POLAND-TUSK will not fix Climate Change Sept (coal). 2014 KYOTO PAYMENTS on Climate/Energy -free allowance???- CANADA ENVIRONMENT: Climate Change Hell is here folks -TRILLIONS AND TRILLIONS OF ELETRONIC -WASTE- 14 Billion dumped a year-seriously- one phone 4 life –one device 4 life- PLEASE- save our planet- this is worse than fracking/oil/digging mines/destroying nature food- UN and conglomerates and despot politicians are destroying our planet- one phone-one electronic device come on -it's our planet - the only one we have - CLIMATE HELL- WORLD ALL POLITICIANS NEED 2 WAKE UP- especially USA/China/India- Sept 22 UN CLIMATE CHANGE SUMMIT- SEPTEMBER 2014 Germany, Australia, Japan and Canada among those who will not be attending/they take paradise and put up a parking lot- Joni Mitchell and Sony and Cher 60s
http://nova0000scotia.blogspot.ca/2014/09/trillions-and-trillions-of-e-waste.html
AND...
BLOGSPOT:
CANADA MILITARY NEWS: Bankingn$$$richgonnakillusagain/ USA-Europe-Asia-Middle East-China- all the banking institutions- u are creating a mess in our world of finances again and ordinary people will pay dearly... 2008 all over again/Canada is doing better at Climate Change than USA China Japan or Russia and much of Europe and Asia...come on... JANUARY 16/15... and why is USA always paying 2 fight the planets wars... and Canada, UK, Aussies and French tagging along CLEANING UP MIDDLE EAST AND AFRICAN MESSES.... all these years... give each of your children a good free education and treat your poor better than slaves in the 21st century...come on.. please -GOD BLESS OUR TROOPS... we want u home and know ur soooo tired/and the media still lies http://nova0000scotia.blogspot.ca/2015/01/canada-military-news-usa-europe-asia.html
=========
Je Suis Charlie
--------------------
----------------
BLOGGED: wordpress
CANADA MILITARY NEWS- GLOBAL YOUTH UNEMPLOYMENT- June/July 2014- Canada is flying high over some nations- and education does matter- and poverty in 2014 is UNITED NATIONS DISGRACE-nation by nation breakdown of unemployment (USA now has 100 Million Unemployed and EU is over 60%)
------------
Blogged:
CANADA MILITARY NEWS- Teaching children how 2 save money/teaching first aid/preparing 4 storms/and looking after pets in emergency- hopefully Canada schools will make Elementary school take up money and first aid- bcause they r smart
http://nova0000scotia.blogspot.ca/2014/12/canada-military-news-schools-need-2.html
BEST COMMENTS: I'm more concerned with the scheme for world dominance by ANY means necessary.
COMMENT:
Dr. Kent Moors of Duquesne University fame and top energy consultant to many governments concurs with you.
In his 2014 book 'The Great Game: The Coming Face Off for Global Supremacy', Dr. Moors states "We are in the very early stages of the shale oil boom". p. 99
He cites the following discoveries:
Green River Formation in Wyoming - 800 billion barrels
New Albany Formation in Illinois - 300 billion barrels
Wolfcamp Shale in Texas - 50 billion barrels
Tuscaloosa Marine Shale in Louisiana - 7 billion barrels
The Eagle Ford Shale formation is 400 miles by 50 miles wide and 250 feet thick, where 11,000 of a planned 96,000 wells have been drilled. p. 99
Discoveries of shale formations are occurring all over the world under virtually every continent and nation. This is in addition to the now known shale gas formations worldwide holding 200 trillion cubic meters of gas. p. 103
No, someone is purposely downplaying a huge, game changing set of discoveries.
COMMENT:
if anyone expects accurate information from our government and or the oil industry, you need to go back to grammer school. during the 1974 gasoline shortages exxon in baytown texas had full tanks of gas, and were loading tanker ships and moving them mmore than 9 miles off shore. i was in instrumention at the exxon plant. it was a created shortage to drive prices up. look at exxon stock in the last 40 yrs. there is no peak oil this usa is all about power and money. nothing else.
comment:
What a waste. Flaring. At least run generators w it and sell the power. There ought to be govt intervention so that non economically recoverable gas isn't flared but is recovered, the losses in doing so spread across the ind. The waste is sinful. Sell it at a profit if possible, if not recover it at a loss by regulation.
NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC- USA... UR KILLING UR NATURE...UR SOIL...UR WATER AND UR AMERICANS.... shame on u...Fracking??? Fracking - hundreds of thosands of Fracking wells and u - like China- bragg about changing Climate and emissions ???
Connecting Dots: The News in Perspective
How Long Can the U.S. Oil Boom Last?
The long-term problem for oil frackers isn't just low prices. It's low reserves.
Flared natural gas signals another oil well in North Dakota, one of the centers of the recent boom in U.S. oil supplies from fracking.
Photograph by Eugene Richards, National Geographic
Dennis Dimick National Geographic Published December 19, 2014
Now that oil prices have dropped to levels not seen since 2009, helped by a flood of oil flowing from hydraulic fracturing or fracking wells in North Dakota and Texas, it's time to ask the question: How long can the U.S. oil boom last?
In the short term, the price drop threatens profits from fracking, which is more expensive than conventional drilling. Sure enough, permit applications to drill oil and gas wells in the U.S declined almost 40 percent in November.
But in the long term, the U.S. oil boom faces an even more serious constraint: Though daily production now rivals Saudi Arabia's, it's coming from underground reserves that are a small fraction of the ones in the Middle East.
That geologic reality is easy to forget in the euphoria of the boom. Output from oil fracking in the U.S. has tripled in the past three years, from about one million barrels per day in 2010 to more than three million barrels per day at the end of 2013. Total U.S. oil production has risen to more than nine million barrels a day, a level close to 1970's historic high and nearly as high as the 9.6 million barrels of daily oil production from Saudi Arabia.
Picture of roughnecks removing two miles of heavy steel drilling pipe one section at a time
Years of oil prices above $100 per barrel have driven a boom in oil production from shale, providing thousands of oil field jobs and boosting U.S. production to near-record levels.
Photograph by Eugene Richards, National Geographic
While the U.S. still relies on imports for about 40 percent of its petroleum, oil imports have dropped since 2005 because of improved domestic supply from oil fracking, better vehicle fuel efficiency, and depressed fuel demand as a result of the 2008 economic crash. The U.S. Department of Energy reports a growing surplus of domestic oil.
Because of all these factors, oil prices that regularly reached more than $100 per barrel the past three years have dropped about 40 percent to $60 or below. On December 10 the Energy Department projected an average price of $63 per barrel for West Texas intermediate crude for all of 2015. In late November, gasoline prices in the U.S. fell to five-year lows.
Breaking Even With Fracking
Fracking oil or gas from mile-deep shales is expensive: It requires deep vertical and horizontal drilling and injections of chemicals, sand, and water at high pressure. Until now, high oil prices have nonetheless made fracking a lucrative investment. More than a million fracked oil or gas wells exist in the U.S.
Watch this video animation to learn how the process of hydraulic fracturing, known as fracking, forces oil from the ground in North Dakota.
With oil prices down, so are profits. Recent analysis by Scotiabank estimates that frackers need $69 per barrel of oil to make money. One oil executive quoted in the Economist said he can cope as long as the oil price is above $50. Another said the industry is "not healthy" below $70.
Businessweek reports that the "dirty secret" of the shale oil boom is that it may not last. Fracked wells are short-lived, with a well's output typically declining from more than 1,000 barrels a day to 100 barrels in just a few years. New wells must be drilled frequently to maintain production.
While wells currently pumping can survive low market prices because they have already incurred startup and drilling costs, low oil prices diminish the incentive to invest in new well investments.
Of course, as Michael Webber of the University of Texas at Austin told the New York Times, price fluctuations are part of a repeating cycle in the oil business over the past century. No one thinks the current low prices are permanent.
"This is what commodity markets do," Webber said. "They go to high price, and high price inspires new production and also inspires consumers to use less. After a couple of years of that, prices collapse. Then low prices inspire consumers to consume more and encourage suppliers to turn off production. Then you get a supply shortage and prices go back up."
Picture of Shaybah oil field at sunrise
Saudi Arabia remains the world's largest oil producer. Known Middle East oil reserves are vastly bigger than U.S. oil shale reserves.
Photograph by Reza, National Geographic
Geological Limits
While low prices may only temporarily throttle expansion of oil fracking, the underlying geology—deeply buried shale rock that contains diffuse hydrocarbons—looms as a more fundamental limit on fracking's future. Recent projections indicate that by decade's end or a few years after, U.S. oil production from fracking will likely flatten out as supplies are depleted.
"A well-supplied oil market in the short-term should not disguise the challenges that lie ahead," International Energy Agency (IEA) chief economist Fatih Birol said in releasing the IEA's 2014 World Energy Outlook.
The IEA report projects that U.S. domestic oil supplies, dominated by fracking, will begin to decline by 2020. "As tight oil output in the United States levels off, and non-OPEC supply falls back in the 2020s," the report says, "the Middle East becomes the major source of supply growth."
Earlier this year the U.S. Energy Information Agency (EIA) also forecast a plateau in U.S. oil production after 2020.
The basis for these forecasts are estimates of shale oil reserves. A 2013 Energy Department report on technically recoverable shale oil—the amount that's recoverable without regard to cost—puts U.S. potential at 58 billion barrels. That's equivalent to a little more than eight years of U.S. consumption at the current rate of almost 19 million barrels a day.
The Energy Department's estimate of "proved reserves" of shale oil—those that can be recovered economically today—is only about ten billion barrels. That's about a sixth of technically recoverable reserves, and less than a year and a half's worth of current consumption. Proved reserves include all currently known U.S. oil shale resources-North Dakota Bakken, Texas Eagle Ford, Colorado and Nebraska Niobrara, Texas Barnett, and others.
In contrast, the proved reserves from just three Middle East nations—Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and the United Arab Emirates—total more than 460 billion barrels. That's 46 times U.S. shale oil reserves, and more than 12 times the total U.S. oil reserves.
Those estimates help explain why the IEA projects the Middle East as "the major source of future supply growth," long after the U.S. shale oil boom has run its course. Price is important, but whether oil exists at all is even more so.
Dennis Dimick serves as National Geographic's executive editor for the environment. You can follow him on Twitter, Instagram, and flickr.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/12/141219-fracking-oil-supply-price-reserves-profits-environment/
-----------------
Rita MacNeil- The Working Man
Opinion: Canada should stockpile oil while prices are low
Gordon Laxer, Special to Montreal GazetteMore from Gordon Laxer, Special to Montreal Gazette
Published on: January 20, 2015Last Updated: January 22, 2015 12:57 PM EST
While oil is cheap, China is cannily buying up to 700,000 barrels of oil a day to boost its emergency oil reserves.
Ensuring energy security can make governments money. The U.S. Treasury has netted $22 billion by selling oil from its giant strategic petroleum reserves (SPRs) when oil prices were high and filling them when prices were low.
China is joining most rich countries in stocking SPRs because it knows Saudi Arabia is driving down oil prices to stall output of high-cost, non-OPEC oil, including U.S. shale oil.
Oil demand will recover and with output flat, another massive international oil supply shock will come. China is boosting reserves from 30 to 100 days of oil imports to protect its people’s economic and physical wellbeing when the shortage hits.
Should we follow China’s lead? Quebec needs emergency oil reserves much more than its maple syrup reserve. Oil powers almost all Quebec’s transportation.
Alberta’s oilsands’ two centuries of recoverable oil cannot protect us from international oil shortages. Canada exports much oil in the West, but imports 40 per cent of Canadians’ oil use in the east. Quebec imports 90 per cent of its oil.
Imports will drop somewhat when Enbridge’s pipeline 9B is reversed and ships some Western Canadian oil to Montreal.
But the proximity of Enbridge’s pipelines to North Dakota shale oil means line 9B will also bring U.S. oil to Montreal.
As recently as 2012, Algeria and other OPEC countries supplied half of Canada’s oil imports. Now half of Canada’s crude oil imports and much refined oil, including gasoline, come from the United States.
U.S. oil imports seem reassuring, but aren’t.
Would U.S. oil shipments to Quebec and Ontario stop during international supply crises? Probably. When CBC radio host Anna Maria Tremonti asked the late Matt Simmons this question in a 2008 interview, he replied: “It’s pretty simple. We’d shut you off.”
Simmons headed Houston’s largest energy investment bank and advised George W. Bush on energy.
Despite the surge in fracked shale oil, the U.S. Energy Information Administration forecasts the U.S. will import a quarter to a third of its oil through 2035. National security always trumps anything else in the U.S. In a supply crunch, Washington will probably keep domestic oil for Americans.
Will Enbridge line 9B and TransCanada’s Energy East pipeline give eastern Canadians oil security? Not necessarily.
If it makes commercial sense, both pipeline companies will sell domestic oil to eastern Canadians. But there is no guarantee the incidental security would last because oil for Quebecers and Atlantic Canadians would be a sideline to delivering oilsands oil to world markets.
Canada promises the U.S. oil security. The U.S. has a national energy security and independence plan. If Canada looks after U.S. oil security, and the U.S. looks after its own oil security, who looks after Canadians?
Canada belongs to the International Energy Agency. Unlike the other members, including oil-exporting Norway and Denmark, Canada has no SPRs. We need them.
Should Canada follow France’s 1925 lead and require that oil corporations keep emergency stocks for national purposes or follow China and the U.S. and have government oil reserves?
To access low oil prices now, Canada should start with requiring oil companies maintain stocks, but plan now to build government stocks.
Canadians can reach long-term energy security, though, only by also combating climate change. Phase out Canadian carbon energy exports, direct Canadian conventional, non-fracked oil to eastern Canadians and use it to transition to a low carbon future.
Gordon Laxer is the founding director and former head of University of Alberta’s Parkland Institute and author of a forthcoming book on Canadian energy and ecological security.
http://montrealgazette.com/business/energy/opinion-canada-should-stockpile-oil-while-prices-are-low#
-------------------
CANADA HAS ....... O.N.L.Y........ 36 MILLION PEOPLE...... taxing carbon emissions almost destroyed the EU..... and the world's politicians know this.... is just.... f**king stupid....
1. since OIL IS SO CHEAP... keep it that way 4ever
2. fine each and every person that doesn't compost and sort garbage
3. tax $$$$$TRILLIONAIRES... LIKE APPLE...MICROSOFT...SAMSUNG... ETC... $$$MILLIONS 4 ELECTRONIC WASTE..... FINE STORES THAT SELL ELECTRONICS...... $$$$$$TAXES ON WASTE...AND CELL/INTERNET COMPANIES.....
Trudeau’s wrong, again
Claiming Obama would have approved the Keystone pipeline by now if Harper had taxed carbon emissions is absurd
http://www.torontosun.com/2015/01/24/trudeaus-wrong-again
If a f**king crow can do it.... SO ...CAN...U
NOVA SCOTIA... AGAIN...
Nova Scotia Power biomass project in Cape Breton raising green concerns
AARON BESWICK TRURO BUREAU Last Updated January 9, 2015 - 7:53am
Chipped wood is piled up, waiting to be burned at Nova Scotia Power’s biomass burning power generating station at Point Tupper, Richmond County, in 2013. (AARON BESWICK / Truro Bureau)
About 2,790 hectares.
That’s a rough estimate of how much woodland will need to be cut annually to feed Nova Scotia Power’s biomass boiler at Point Tupper.
“It seems that more of the fears are coming true than the benefits we had envisioned from that facility,” said Kari Easthouse, manager of the Cape Breton Private Land Partnership.
Foresters in northern Nova Scotia are warning that the wood being burned at Nova Scotia Power’s new biomass boiler may be green, but the electricity coming out of it isn’t.
The boiler, started by now-defunct NewPage Port Hawkesbury Corp. and sold to Nova Scotia Power, opened during the summer of 2013. Running at peak capacity, which it is a bit shy of now, it burns 670,000 green tonnes of wood fibre annually to produce 60 megawatts of electricity.
“They’re going after anything they can get their hands on to feed that thing,” Phil Clark, an Antigonish County sawmill operator, said Thursday.
“They’re laying places to waste to feed it.”
The boiler was sold to Nova Scotians as a way to throw one stone at two birds.
First off, because trees grow back, it would help the province reach its renewable energy targets. Secondly, it would provide a market for wood not wanted for pulp and paper.
“By providing a market for the low-quality wood, the idea was that it would create opportunities to do treatments to increase the health and value of the forest,” said Easthouse.
“That isn’t what appears to be happening.”
What does is land getting cut solely to feed the boiler.
According to Nova Scotia Power, half the boiler’s needs are fed by wood waste from Port Hawkesbury Paper, sawmills and other woods operations. That leaves about 335,000 green tonnes that are cut to feed it.
A rough industry average in northern Nova Scotia is that you get about 120 tonnes of wood fibre off a hectare. Divide 335,000 tonnes by 120 and you get 2,792 hectares getting cut every year for the foreseeable future to be burned for electricity in a furnace that works at about 74per cent efficiency.
“You’ve got to be careful with averages,” Allan Eddy, associate deputy minister at the Natural Resources Department, warned Thursday. “If you shoot two feet in front of a duck and then two feet behind a duck, on average that duck is dead.”
However, Eddy acknowledged that land is being cleared to feed the biomass boiler.
He painted it as a matter of economics that couldn’t have been predicted before the plant opened and that is likely to change for the better in years to come.
Eddy said the shakeup of the province’s forest industry over the last five years has resulted in a severe decline in the province’s harvesting capacity. The NewPage Port Hawkesbury bankruptcy and the closure of Liverpool’s Bowater Mersey mill resulted in a lot of harvesting contractors jumping ship from the forest industry.
“For every 10 logs that the mills need cut, there’s the capacity to cut seven or (seven and a half) logs,” said Eddy.
That puts a premium on harvesting capacity.
He said Nova Scotia Power has an obligation to its ratepayers to get wood fibre as cheaply as possible. The cheapest way is to clear land, not selectively harvest to improve the lot for the future.
“Do all Nova Scotians who pay power bills want to pay a higher power bill so that they can help us improve our forest?” said Eddy.
“I don’t think there’s a guilty party. … The biomass plant is probably more of an opportunity than it is a problem, at this stage of the game. We’re still a little ways away from achieving the opportunities we envisioned.”
Easthouse agrees that the biomass plant still presents an opportunity if the harvesting methods are changed.
He also said the best thing to do with some stands, like those of beetle-damaged white spruce, is to clear them off and start fresh.
But that will require a vision for the future that’s not being shown now, he said.
http://thechronicleherald.ca/novascotia/1261832-nova-scotia-power-biomass-project-in-cape-breton-raising-green-concerns
THE WORKING MAN- RITA MACNEIL
on April 6th, 2014
Reply to this comment
on November 25th, 2014
Reply to this comment